Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

The role of brain shift, patient age, and Parkinson's disease duration in the difference between anatomical and electrophysiological targets for subthalamic stimulation

J. Chrastina, Z. Novák, M. Baláž, I. Říha, M. Bočková, I. Rektor,

. 2013 ; 27 (5) : 676-82.

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

INTRODUCTION: Although microrecording is common in subthalamic stimulation, microelectrode monitoring prolongs surgical time and may increase the risk of haemorrhagic complications. The main reason for electrophysiological mapping is the discrepancy between the calculated anatomical and final electrophysiological targets. The aim of this paper is to describe the relationship between anatomical and electrophysiological targets defined as the best electrophysiological recordings from multiple parallel electrode tracts, explaining the target discrepancy with attention paid to the role of brain shift and patient- and disease-related factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subthalamic electrodes were stereotactically implanted in 58 patients using microrecording by means of parallel electrodes at defined distances. The relationship between the final electrode placement to its anatomical trajectory and the relationship between the definitive electrodes implanted on the right and left sides were analysed, as was the influence of patient age, Parkinson's disease duration, and late motor complications duration. RESULTS: Final electrode placement matched the anatomical trajectory in 53.4% of patients on the right side and 43.1% of patients on the left side. Electrode positions were symmetrical in 38.3% of patients. The analysis of left and right electrode positions does not prove a statistically significant prevalence of lateral and posterior final electrode trajectories as could be expected from lateral and posterior movements of the brain caused by brain shift, although there was some tendency for a larger percentage of lateral electrodes on the left side. Age, Parkinson's disease duration, and L-DOPA effect duration were not confirmed as responsible factors. CONCLUSIONS: The difference between anatomical trajectory and final electrode placement supports the use of functional microelectrode monitoring in subthalamic deep brain stimulation. Brain shift is not the only causative factor of the difference. The possible roles of age, Parkinson's disease duration, and late motor complications duration were also not confirmed by study results.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc14064217
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20140707131858.0
007      
ta
008      
140704s2013 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3109/02688697.2013.771726 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)23458561
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Chrastina, Jan $u Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St. Anne's Teaching Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic. jan.chrastina@fnusa.cz
245    14
$a The role of brain shift, patient age, and Parkinson's disease duration in the difference between anatomical and electrophysiological targets for subthalamic stimulation / $c J. Chrastina, Z. Novák, M. Baláž, I. Říha, M. Bočková, I. Rektor,
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Although microrecording is common in subthalamic stimulation, microelectrode monitoring prolongs surgical time and may increase the risk of haemorrhagic complications. The main reason for electrophysiological mapping is the discrepancy between the calculated anatomical and final electrophysiological targets. The aim of this paper is to describe the relationship between anatomical and electrophysiological targets defined as the best electrophysiological recordings from multiple parallel electrode tracts, explaining the target discrepancy with attention paid to the role of brain shift and patient- and disease-related factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subthalamic electrodes were stereotactically implanted in 58 patients using microrecording by means of parallel electrodes at defined distances. The relationship between the final electrode placement to its anatomical trajectory and the relationship between the definitive electrodes implanted on the right and left sides were analysed, as was the influence of patient age, Parkinson's disease duration, and late motor complications duration. RESULTS: Final electrode placement matched the anatomical trajectory in 53.4% of patients on the right side and 43.1% of patients on the left side. Electrode positions were symmetrical in 38.3% of patients. The analysis of left and right electrode positions does not prove a statistically significant prevalence of lateral and posterior final electrode trajectories as could be expected from lateral and posterior movements of the brain caused by brain shift, although there was some tendency for a larger percentage of lateral electrodes on the left side. Age, Parkinson's disease duration, and L-DOPA effect duration were not confirmed as responsible factors. CONCLUSIONS: The difference between anatomical trajectory and final electrode placement supports the use of functional microelectrode monitoring in subthalamic deep brain stimulation. Brain shift is not the only causative factor of the difference. The possible roles of age, Parkinson's disease duration, and late motor complications duration were also not confirmed by study results.
650    _2
$a věkové faktory $7 D000367
650    _2
$a mozek $x fyziologie $7 D001921
650    _2
$a hluboká mozková stimulace $x metody $7 D046690
650    _2
$a implantované elektrody $7 D004567
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a levodopa $x fyziologie $7 D007980
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a pohyb $x fyziologie $7 D009068
650    _2
$a Parkinsonova nemoc $x patologie $x patofyziologie $x terapie $7 D010300
650    _2
$a nucleus subthalamicus $x patologie $x patofyziologie $7 D020531
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Novák, Zdenek
700    1_
$a Baláž, Marek
700    1_
$a Říha, Ivo
700    1_
$a Bočková, Martina
700    1_
$a Rektor, Ivan
773    0_
$w MED00000872 $t British journal of neurosurgery $x 1360-046X $g Roč. 27, č. 5 (2013), s. 676-82
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23458561 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20140704 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20140707132147 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1031701 $s 862949
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2013 $b 27 $c 5 $d 676-82 $i 1360-046X $m British journal of neurosurgery $n Br J Neurosurg $x MED00000872
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20140704

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...