-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Calling by domestic piglets during simulated crushing and isolation: a signal of need
G. Illmann, K. Hammerschmidt, M. Spinka, C. Tallet,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2006
Free Medical Journals
od 2006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
od 2006
PubMed Central
od 2006
Europe PubMed Central
od 2006
ProQuest Central
od 2006-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-10-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2006
- MeSH
- chování zvířat * MeSH
- nemoci prasat patofyziologie MeSH
- prasata * MeSH
- rány a poranění patofyziologie MeSH
- stárnutí * MeSH
- vokalizace zvířat * MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
This study examined whether piglet distress vocalizations vary with age, body weight and health status, according to the predictions of the honest signalling of need evolutionary model. Vocalizations were recorded during manual squeezing (a simulation of being crushed by mother sow) and during isolation on Days 1 and 7 after birth in piglets from 15 litters. We predicted that during squeezing, younger, lighter and sick piglets would call more intensely because they are in higher risk of dying during crushing and therefore they benefit more from the sow's reaction to intensive vocalization. For isolation, we predicted that lighter and younger piglets would call more because they are more vulnerable to adverse effects of the separation. Calls were analyzed in their time and frequency domain. The rate of calling, call duration, proportion of high-pitched calls and eight acoustic parameters characterizing frequency distribution and tonality were used as indicators of acoustic signalling intensity. Piglets that experienced "squeezing" on Day 1 produced more intense acoustic distress signalling than on Day 7. Lighter piglets called more during squeezing than heavier piglets. Health status did not significantly affect any of the indicators of intensity of vocalization during squeezing. In isolation, none of the parameters of vocalization intensity were affected either by the age or by the weight of the piglets. In summary, the model of honest signalling of need was confirmed in the squeezed situation, but not in the isolation situation.
Agrocampus Rennes UMR1348 PEGASE Rennes France
Cognitive Ethology Laboratory German Primate Center Göttingen Germany
Department of Ethology Institute of Animal Science Prague Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14074396
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20141006122231.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 141006s2013 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0083529 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24349527
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Illmann, Gudrun $u Department of Ethology, Institute of Animal Science, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Calling by domestic piglets during simulated crushing and isolation: a signal of need / $c G. Illmann, K. Hammerschmidt, M. Spinka, C. Tallet,
- 520 9_
- $a This study examined whether piglet distress vocalizations vary with age, body weight and health status, according to the predictions of the honest signalling of need evolutionary model. Vocalizations were recorded during manual squeezing (a simulation of being crushed by mother sow) and during isolation on Days 1 and 7 after birth in piglets from 15 litters. We predicted that during squeezing, younger, lighter and sick piglets would call more intensely because they are in higher risk of dying during crushing and therefore they benefit more from the sow's reaction to intensive vocalization. For isolation, we predicted that lighter and younger piglets would call more because they are more vulnerable to adverse effects of the separation. Calls were analyzed in their time and frequency domain. The rate of calling, call duration, proportion of high-pitched calls and eight acoustic parameters characterizing frequency distribution and tonality were used as indicators of acoustic signalling intensity. Piglets that experienced "squeezing" on Day 1 produced more intense acoustic distress signalling than on Day 7. Lighter piglets called more during squeezing than heavier piglets. Health status did not significantly affect any of the indicators of intensity of vocalization during squeezing. In isolation, none of the parameters of vocalization intensity were affected either by the age or by the weight of the piglets. In summary, the model of honest signalling of need was confirmed in the squeezed situation, but not in the isolation situation.
- 650 12
- $a stárnutí $7 D000375
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 12
- $a chování zvířat $7 D001522
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a prasata $7 D013552
- 650 _2
- $a nemoci prasat $x patofyziologie $7 D013553
- 650 12
- $a vokalizace zvířat $7 D014828
- 650 _2
- $a rány a poranění $x patofyziologie $7 D014947
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Hammerschmidt, Kurt $u Cognitive Ethology Laboratory, German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Spinka, Marek $u Department of Ethology, Institute of Animal Science, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Tallet, Céline $u Department of Ethology, Institute of Animal Science, Prague, Czech Republic ; INRA, UMR1348 PEGASE, Saint-Gilles, France ; Agrocampus Rennes, UMR1348 PEGASE, Rennes, France.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 8, č. 12 (2013), s. e83529
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24349527 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20141006 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20141006122708 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1042279 $s 873308
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2013 $b 8 $c 12 $d e83529 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20141006