-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The results of primary repair after distal biceps tendon rupture
M. Hrubina, J. Behounek, M. Skotak, O. Krumpl, P. Mika, D. Olgun,
Jazyk angličtina Země Turecko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2000
Free Medical Journals
od 1963
Open Access Digital Library
od 2000-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2010-07-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
PubMed
24164937
DOI
10.3944/aott.2013.2820
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- hojení ran MeSH
- kostní šrouby * MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční tomografie MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- poranění paže chirurgie MeSH
- poranění šlachy chirurgie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- ruptura MeSH
- šicí techniky přístrojové vybavení MeSH
- tenodéza metody MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to present the long term results of primary tenodesis in the treatment of distal biceps tendon rupture. METHODS: Patients previously treated for distal tendon rupture were evaluated. In all cases anatomical reattachment with a single-incision through the anterior approach was performed with either a screw and washer (modified McReynolds technique) or a Mitek Anchor. Analysis was performed using clinical and radiological examination and DASH score at the end of 2011. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (21 males; mean age: 47.5 years) were treated for distal biceps tendon rupture. Fixation was performed using the modified McReynolds technique in 11 and Mitek Anchor in 10 patients. The McReynold technique had excellent result in 63.6% of patients, a 9.1% risk of implant failure and a mean DASH score of 7.8. The Mitek Anchor technique had excellent result in 60% of patients, a 10% risk of implant failure and a mean DASH score of 7.4. CONCLUSION: Operative treatment for distal biceps tendon rupture appears to be a safe and effective method and consistently yields good results.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14074564
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20191115091022.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 141006s2013 tu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3944/aott.2013.2820 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24164937
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a tu
- 100 1_
- $a Hrubina, Maros $u Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital Pelhrimov, Pelhrimov, Czech Republic.
- 245 14
- $a The results of primary repair after distal biceps tendon rupture / $c M. Hrubina, J. Behounek, M. Skotak, O. Krumpl, P. Mika, D. Olgun,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to present the long term results of primary tenodesis in the treatment of distal biceps tendon rupture. METHODS: Patients previously treated for distal tendon rupture were evaluated. In all cases anatomical reattachment with a single-incision through the anterior approach was performed with either a screw and washer (modified McReynolds technique) or a Mitek Anchor. Analysis was performed using clinical and radiological examination and DASH score at the end of 2011. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (21 males; mean age: 47.5 years) were treated for distal biceps tendon rupture. Fixation was performed using the modified McReynolds technique in 11 and Mitek Anchor in 10 patients. The McReynold technique had excellent result in 63.6% of patients, a 9.1% risk of implant failure and a mean DASH score of 7.8. The Mitek Anchor technique had excellent result in 60% of patients, a 10% risk of implant failure and a mean DASH score of 7.4. CONCLUSION: Operative treatment for distal biceps tendon rupture appears to be a safe and effective method and consistently yields good results.
- 650 _2
- $a poranění paže $x chirurgie $7 D001134
- 650 12
- $a kostní šrouby $7 D001863
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a ruptura $7 D012421
- 650 _2
- $a šicí techniky $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D013536
- 650 _2
- $a poranění šlachy $x chirurgie $7 D013708
- 650 _2
- $a tenodéza $x metody $7 D053656
- 650 _2
- $a časové faktory $7 D013997
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a hojení ran $7 D014945
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Běhounek, Jiří $7 xx0242019
- 700 1_
- $a Skotak, Miroslav
- 700 1_
- $a Krumpl, Oldrich
- 700 1_
- $a Mika, Pavel
- 700 1_
- $a Olgun, Deniz
- 773 0_
- $w MED00184777 $t Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica $x 1017-995X $g Roč. 47, č. 5 (2013), s. 301-6
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24164937 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20141006 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20191115091300 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1042447 $s 873476
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2013 $b 47 $c 5 $d 301-6 $i 1017-995X $m Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica $n Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc $x MED00184777
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20141006