• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

DNA persistence after treatment of Lyme borreliosis

D. Pícha, L. Moravcová, D. Vaňousová, J. Hercogová, Z. Blechová,

. 2014 ; 59 (2) : 115-125.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc14076620

Grantová podpora
NT13467 MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

One hundred twenty-four patients-53 with neuroborreliosis, 48 with erythema migrans, and 23 with Lyme arthritis-were tested in a prospective study for the presence of the DNA of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), urine, and synovial fluid by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Specific DNA was detected using five amplification systems simultaneously: three targeted chromosomal genes encoding 16S rDNA, flagellin, and p66; and two plasmid sequences of OspA and OspC. Patients were examined clinically and by PCR before and after treatment and again after 3 and 6 months. Before treatment, the specific DNA was detected in 78 patients (62.9 %). Forty-one neuroborreliosis patients were DNA-positive (77.4 %), with CSF positivity in 26 patients, urine in 25, and plasma in 16. Twenty-six erythema migrans patients were DNA-positive (54.2 %), with plasma positivity in 18 cases and urine in 14. Eleven Lyme arthritis cases (47.8 %) were DNA positive (six in urine, five in plasma, and four in synovial fluid). The frequency of PCR positives was comparable in CSF and urine, and it was lower by approximately 50 % in plasma. Specific DNA was also found in a significant number of patients in later testing periods: 48 patients after treatment, 29 patients after 3 months, and 6 patients after 6 months. The prolonged PCR positivity was not explainable by persistent infection according to the clinical manifestations of the disease. Possible explanations of the problem are discussed.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc14076620
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190702084915.0
007      
ta
008      
141023s2014 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s12223-013-0272-4 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)23929025
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Pícha, Dušan, $u 1st Clinic for Infectious Diseases, Hospital Na Bulovce, 2nd Medical School, Charles University, Budínova 2, 180 81, Prague, Czech Republic, dusan.picha@bulovka.cz. $d 1957- $7 skuk0004583
245    10
$a DNA persistence after treatment of Lyme borreliosis / $c D. Pícha, L. Moravcová, D. Vaňousová, J. Hercogová, Z. Blechová,
520    9_
$a One hundred twenty-four patients-53 with neuroborreliosis, 48 with erythema migrans, and 23 with Lyme arthritis-were tested in a prospective study for the presence of the DNA of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), urine, and synovial fluid by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Specific DNA was detected using five amplification systems simultaneously: three targeted chromosomal genes encoding 16S rDNA, flagellin, and p66; and two plasmid sequences of OspA and OspC. Patients were examined clinically and by PCR before and after treatment and again after 3 and 6 months. Before treatment, the specific DNA was detected in 78 patients (62.9 %). Forty-one neuroborreliosis patients were DNA-positive (77.4 %), with CSF positivity in 26 patients, urine in 25, and plasma in 16. Twenty-six erythema migrans patients were DNA-positive (54.2 %), with plasma positivity in 18 cases and urine in 14. Eleven Lyme arthritis cases (47.8 %) were DNA positive (six in urine, five in plasma, and four in synovial fluid). The frequency of PCR positives was comparable in CSF and urine, and it was lower by approximately 50 % in plasma. Specific DNA was also found in a significant number of patients in later testing periods: 48 patients after treatment, 29 patients after 3 months, and 6 patients after 6 months. The prolonged PCR positivity was not explainable by persistent infection according to the clinical manifestations of the disease. Possible explanations of the problem are discussed.
650    _2
$a tělesné tekutiny $x mikrobiologie $7 D001826
650    _2
$a Borrelia burgdorferi komplex $x genetika $7 D015748
650    _2
$a DNA bakterií $x izolace a purifikace $7 D004269
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a lymeská nemoc $x farmakoterapie $x mikrobiologie $7 D008193
650    _2
$a polymerázová řetězová reakce $7 D016133
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Moravcová, Lenka, $d 1959- $7 xx0110521
700    1_
$a Vaňousová, Daniela $7 xx0110351
700    1_
$a Třešňák Hercogová, Jana, $d 1959- $7 nlk19990073221
700    1_
$a Blechová, Zuzana $7 xx0106736
773    0_
$w MED00011005 $t Folia microbiologica $x 1874-9356 $g Roč. 59, č. 2 (2014), s. 115-125
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23929025 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b online $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20141023 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190702085047 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1044701 $s 875564
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 59 $c 2 $d 115-125 $i 1874-9356 $m Folia microbiologica $n Folia microbiol. (Prague) $x MED00011005
GRA    __
$a NT13467 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20141023

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...