• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Factors affecting the success of influenza laboratory diagnosis

R. Kissová, M. Svitok, C. Klement, L. Maďarová

. 2014 ; 22 (3) : 164-169.

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc15003159

Influenza is one of the most common human infectious diseases, and has profound health and economic consequences. The laboratory diag- nosis of influenza virus infections plays an important role in the global surveillance of influenza. Therefore, there is a growing demand for highly sensitive and rapid methods for detecting influenza. The performance of particular diagnostic methods is affected by various factors. In this study, we assess the effects of patients' age and time to diagnosis on the probability of detecting influenza using four diagnostic methods (virus isolation, rapid test, RT-PCR and real-time RT-PCR). We examined 3,546 samples from central and eastern Slovakia during the influenza seasons from 2005-2006 to 2010-2011. In general, the probability of influenza detection significantly decreased with the time from onset of illness to sample collection (T1) as well as with patients' age (AGE). On the contrary, time from sample collection to delivery (T2) did not play a role in the prob- ability of influenza detection. As judged by odds ratios, the virus isolation method was most sensitive to T1, followed by the rapid test and RT-PCR methods. For the effect of AGE, the rapid test and virus isolation methods were more sensitive than PCR-based methods. The effects of T1 and AGE were independent of each other. Laboratories which participate in inifluenza surveillance should use several methods to enable rapid and accurate influenza A and B virus detection.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15003159
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20150130083226.0
007      
ta
008      
150122s2014 xr d f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.21101/cejph.a3906 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25438393
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Kissová, Renáta $7 _AN024429 $u Regional Authority of Public Health, Department of Medical Microbiology, Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic
245    10
$a Factors affecting the success of influenza laboratory diagnosis / $c R. Kissová, M. Svitok, C. Klement, L. Maďarová
520    9_
$a Influenza is one of the most common human infectious diseases, and has profound health and economic consequences. The laboratory diag- nosis of influenza virus infections plays an important role in the global surveillance of influenza. Therefore, there is a growing demand for highly sensitive and rapid methods for detecting influenza. The performance of particular diagnostic methods is affected by various factors. In this study, we assess the effects of patients' age and time to diagnosis on the probability of detecting influenza using four diagnostic methods (virus isolation, rapid test, RT-PCR and real-time RT-PCR). We examined 3,546 samples from central and eastern Slovakia during the influenza seasons from 2005-2006 to 2010-2011. In general, the probability of influenza detection significantly decreased with the time from onset of illness to sample collection (T1) as well as with patients' age (AGE). On the contrary, time from sample collection to delivery (T2) did not play a role in the prob- ability of influenza detection. As judged by odds ratios, the virus isolation method was most sensitive to T1, followed by the rapid test and RT-PCR methods. For the effect of AGE, the rapid test and virus isolation methods were more sensitive than PCR-based methods. The effects of T1 and AGE were independent of each other. Laboratories which participate in inifluenza surveillance should use several methods to enable rapid and accurate influenza A and B virus detection.
650    _2
$a věkové faktory $7 D000367
650    _2
$a klinické laboratorní techniky $x metody $7 D019411
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a chřipka lidská $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $7 D007251
650    _2
$a ochrana veřejného zdraví $x metody $7 D062486
650    _2
$a roční období $7 D012621
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
651    _2
$a Slovenská republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018154
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Svitok, Marek $7 _AN081233 $u Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovak Republic
700    1_
$a Klement, Cyril, $d 1948- $7 jx20091125005 $u Regional Authority of Public Health, Department of Medical Microbiology, Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic; Faculty of Health in Banská Bystrica, Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
700    1_
$a Maďarová, Lucia $7 xx0088624 $u Regional Authority of Public Health, Department of Medical Microbiology, Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic
773    0_
$w MED00001083 $t Central European journal of public health $x 1210-7778 $g Roč. 22, č. 3 (2014), s. 164-169
856    41
$u http://apps.szu.cz/svi/cejph/ $y domovská stránka časopisu
910    __
$a ABA008 $b B 1829 $c 562 $y 4 $z 0
990    __
$a 20150122 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20150126110219 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1061235 $s 885895
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 22 $c 3 $d 164-169 $i 1210-7778 $m Central European Journal of Public Health $n Cent. Eur. J. Public Health $x MED00001083
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20150122

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...