• Something wrong with this record ?

Planktonic or non-planktonic food in young-of-the-year European perch Perca fluviatilis in ponds

M. Bláha, I. Šetlíková, J. Peterka, J. Musil, T. Policar,

. 2014 ; 85 (2) : 509-15.

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc15008021

Higher biomass especially of some aquatic macrophyte species offered a higher density of phytophilous zoobenthos, but did not increase the proportion of non-planktonic to planktonic prey in young-of-the-year perch Perca fluviatilis. Both abundance and biomass of non-planktonic prey dominated over planktonic prey in the pond with lower biomass of aquatic macrophytes and lower food. Survival of P. fluviatilis was lower (20%) in the pond with lower food than in the other pond (34%), however, specific growth rate (1.3% day(-1) ) and final Fulton's condition factor of P. fluviatilis were similar in both ponds.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15008021
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20150327113807.0
007      
ta
008      
150306s2014 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/jfb.12427 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)24920047
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Bláha, M $u Faculty of Fishery and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Centre of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Zátiší 728/II, 389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Planktonic or non-planktonic food in young-of-the-year European perch Perca fluviatilis in ponds / $c M. Bláha, I. Šetlíková, J. Peterka, J. Musil, T. Policar,
520    9_
$a Higher biomass especially of some aquatic macrophyte species offered a higher density of phytophilous zoobenthos, but did not increase the proportion of non-planktonic to planktonic prey in young-of-the-year perch Perca fluviatilis. Both abundance and biomass of non-planktonic prey dominated over planktonic prey in the pond with lower biomass of aquatic macrophytes and lower food. Survival of P. fluviatilis was lower (20%) in the pond with lower food than in the other pond (34%), however, specific growth rate (1.3% day(-1) ) and final Fulton's condition factor of P. fluviatilis were similar in both ponds.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a biomasa $7 D018533
650    12
$a potravní řetězec $7 D020387
650    _2
$a okounovití $x růst a vývoj $7 D010471
650    12
$a plankton $7 D010933
650    _2
$a rybníky $7 D061005
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Šetlíková, I
700    1_
$a Peterka, J
700    1_
$a Musil, J
700    1_
$a Policar, T
773    0_
$w MED00180294 $t Journal of fish biology $x 1095-8649 $g Roč. 85, č. 2 (2014), s. 509-15
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24920047 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20150306 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20150327114130 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1065294 $s 890821
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 85 $c 2 $d 509-15 $i 1095-8649 $m Journal of fish biology $n J Fish Biol $x MED00180294
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20150306

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options