• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Implantable intravascular defibrillator: defibrillation thresholds of an intravascular cardioverter-defibrillator compared with those of a conventional ICD in humans

P. Neuzil, VY. Reddy, B. Merkely, L. Geller, L. Molnar, J. Bednarek, K. Bartus, M. Richey, TJ. Bsee, WE. Sanders,

. 2014 ; 11 (2) : 210-5.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc15008538

BACKGROUND: A percutaneous intravascular cardioverter-defibrillator (PICD) has been developed with a right ventricular (RV) single-coil lead and titanium electrodes in the superior vena cava (SVC)-brachiocephalic vein (BCV) region and the inferior vena cava (IVC). OBJECTIVE: To compare defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) of the PICD with those of a conventional ICD in humans. METHODS: Ten patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ejection fraction ≤35% were randomized to initial testing with either PICD or conventional ICD. A standard dual-coil lead was positioned in the RV apex. If randomized to PICD, the device was placed into the vasculature such that 1 titanium electrode was positioned in the SVC-BCV region and the second in the IVC. For PICD DFTs, the RV coil of the conventional ICD lead was connected to the PICD mandrel [shock vector: RV (+) to SVC-BCV (-) + IVC (-)]. When testing the conventional ICD, a subcutaneous pocket was formed in the left pectoralis region and the ICD was connected to the lead system and positioned in the pocket [shock vector: RV (+) to SVC (-) + active can (-)]. Each device was removed before testing with the other. A step-down binary search protocol determined the DFT, with the initial shock being 9 J. RESULTS: The mean PICD DFT was 7.6 ± 3.3 J, and the conventional ICD system demonstrated a mean DFT of 9.5 ± 4.7 J (N = 10; paired t test, P = .28). CONCLUSION: The intravascular defibrillator has DFTs similar to those of commercially available ICDs.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15008538
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20150325104204.0
007      
ta
008      
150306s2014 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.10.035 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)24144885
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Neuzil, Petr $u Hospital Na Homolce, Prague, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Implantable intravascular defibrillator: defibrillation thresholds of an intravascular cardioverter-defibrillator compared with those of a conventional ICD in humans / $c P. Neuzil, VY. Reddy, B. Merkely, L. Geller, L. Molnar, J. Bednarek, K. Bartus, M. Richey, TJ. Bsee, WE. Sanders,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: A percutaneous intravascular cardioverter-defibrillator (PICD) has been developed with a right ventricular (RV) single-coil lead and titanium electrodes in the superior vena cava (SVC)-brachiocephalic vein (BCV) region and the inferior vena cava (IVC). OBJECTIVE: To compare defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) of the PICD with those of a conventional ICD in humans. METHODS: Ten patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ejection fraction ≤35% were randomized to initial testing with either PICD or conventional ICD. A standard dual-coil lead was positioned in the RV apex. If randomized to PICD, the device was placed into the vasculature such that 1 titanium electrode was positioned in the SVC-BCV region and the second in the IVC. For PICD DFTs, the RV coil of the conventional ICD lead was connected to the PICD mandrel [shock vector: RV (+) to SVC-BCV (-) + IVC (-)]. When testing the conventional ICD, a subcutaneous pocket was formed in the left pectoralis region and the ICD was connected to the lead system and positioned in the pocket [shock vector: RV (+) to SVC (-) + active can (-)]. Each device was removed before testing with the other. A step-down binary search protocol determined the DFT, with the initial shock being 9 J. RESULTS: The mean PICD DFT was 7.6 ± 3.3 J, and the conventional ICD system demonstrated a mean DFT of 9.5 ± 4.7 J (N = 10; paired t test, P = .28). CONCLUSION: The intravascular defibrillator has DFTs similar to those of commercially available ICDs.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a kardiomyopatie $x terapie $7 D009202
650    12
$a defibrilátory implantabilní $7 D017147
650    _2
$a design vybavení $7 D004867
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a srdeční komory $7 D006352
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a tepový objem $7 D013318
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Reddy, Vivek Y $u Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York.
700    1_
$a Merkely, Bela $u Heart Center Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
700    1_
$a Geller, Laszlo $u Heart Center Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
700    1_
$a Molnar, Levente $u Heart Center Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
700    1_
$a Bednarek, Jacek $u John Paul II Hospital, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
700    1_
$a Bartus, Krzysztof $u John Paul II Hospital, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
700    1_
$a Richey, Mark $u InnerPulse, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
700    1_
$a Bsee, T J Ransbury $u InnerPulse, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
700    1_
$a Sanders, William E $u University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: wesanders@me.com.
773    0_
$w MED00156180 $t Heart rhythm the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society $x 1556-3871 $g Roč. 11, č. 2 (2014), s. 210-5
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24144885 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20150306 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20150325104452 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1065811 $s 891338
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 11 $c 2 $d 210-5 $i 1556-3871 $m Heart rhythm $n Heart Rhythm $x MED00156180
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20150306
Zpět

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace