Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The effect of different biologic and biosynthetic wound covers on keratinocyte growth, stratification and differentiation in vitro

E. Matoušková, O. Mestak,

. 2014 ; 5 (-) : 2041731414554966.

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc15008690

Grantová podpora
NT11392 MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

The purpose of this study was to compare, by means of in vitro cultivation technique, five marketed brands of wound covers used in the treatment of burns and other skin defects (Biobrane(®), Suprathel(®), Veloderm(®), Xe-Derma(®), and Xenoderm(®)) for their ability to stimulate the keratinocyte growth, stratification, and differentiation. In three independent experiments, human keratinocytes were grown on the tested covers in organotypic cultures by the 3T3 feeder layer technique. Vertical paraffin sections of the wound covers with keratinocytes were processed using hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunostaining for involucrin. Keratinocyte populations on the dressings were assessed for (1) number of keratinocyte strata (primary variable), (2) quantitative growth, (3) thickness of the keratinocyte layer, and (4) cell differentiation. The Xe-Derma wound cover provided the best support to keratinocyte proliferation and stratification, with the number of keratinocyte strata significantly (p < 0.05) higher in comparison to all products studied, except Xenoderm. However, in contrast to Xe-Derma, Xenoderm did not significantly differ from the other dressings. The results of this in vitro study show that the brands based on porcine dermal matrix possess the strongest effect on keratinocyte proliferation and stratification. The distinctive position of Xe-Derma may be related to its composition, where natural dermal fibers form a smooth surface, similar to the basement membrane. Furthermore, the results indicate that in vitro evaluation of effects on epithelial growth may accelerate the development of new bio-engineering-based wound covers.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15008690
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210310085818.0
007      
ta
008      
150305s2014 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1177/2041731414554966 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25383177
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Matoušková, Eva $u Prague Burn Centre, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. $7 stk2007393935
245    14
$a The effect of different biologic and biosynthetic wound covers on keratinocyte growth, stratification and differentiation in vitro / $c E. Matoušková, O. Mestak,
520    9_
$a The purpose of this study was to compare, by means of in vitro cultivation technique, five marketed brands of wound covers used in the treatment of burns and other skin defects (Biobrane(®), Suprathel(®), Veloderm(®), Xe-Derma(®), and Xenoderm(®)) for their ability to stimulate the keratinocyte growth, stratification, and differentiation. In three independent experiments, human keratinocytes were grown on the tested covers in organotypic cultures by the 3T3 feeder layer technique. Vertical paraffin sections of the wound covers with keratinocytes were processed using hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunostaining for involucrin. Keratinocyte populations on the dressings were assessed for (1) number of keratinocyte strata (primary variable), (2) quantitative growth, (3) thickness of the keratinocyte layer, and (4) cell differentiation. The Xe-Derma wound cover provided the best support to keratinocyte proliferation and stratification, with the number of keratinocyte strata significantly (p < 0.05) higher in comparison to all products studied, except Xenoderm. However, in contrast to Xe-Derma, Xenoderm did not significantly differ from the other dressings. The results of this in vitro study show that the brands based on porcine dermal matrix possess the strongest effect on keratinocyte proliferation and stratification. The distinctive position of Xe-Derma may be related to its composition, where natural dermal fibers form a smooth surface, similar to the basement membrane. Furthermore, the results indicate that in vitro evaluation of effects on epithelial growth may accelerate the development of new bio-engineering-based wound covers.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Měšťák, Ondřej $u Department of Plastic Surgery, Bulovka Hospital, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. $7 xx0175742
773    0_
$w MED00186364 $t Journal of tissue engineering $x 2041-7314 $g Roč. 5, č. - (2014), s. 2041731414554966
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25383177 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20150305 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210310085814 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1065963 $s 891490
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 5 $c - $d 2041731414554966 $i 2041-7314 $m Journal of tissue engineering $n J Tissue Eng $x MED00186364
GRA    __
$a NT11392 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20150305

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...