-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The effect of different biologic and biosynthetic wound covers on keratinocyte growth, stratification and differentiation in vitro
E. Matoušková, O. Mestak,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
NT11392
MZ0
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
Digitální knihovna NLK
Plný text - Článek
Zdroj
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2010
Free Medical Journals
od 2010
PubMed Central
od 2010
Europe PubMed Central
od 2010
Open Access Digital Library
od 2010-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2010-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2010-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2010
PubMed
25383177
DOI
10.1177/2041731414554966
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The purpose of this study was to compare, by means of in vitro cultivation technique, five marketed brands of wound covers used in the treatment of burns and other skin defects (Biobrane(®), Suprathel(®), Veloderm(®), Xe-Derma(®), and Xenoderm(®)) for their ability to stimulate the keratinocyte growth, stratification, and differentiation. In three independent experiments, human keratinocytes were grown on the tested covers in organotypic cultures by the 3T3 feeder layer technique. Vertical paraffin sections of the wound covers with keratinocytes were processed using hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunostaining for involucrin. Keratinocyte populations on the dressings were assessed for (1) number of keratinocyte strata (primary variable), (2) quantitative growth, (3) thickness of the keratinocyte layer, and (4) cell differentiation. The Xe-Derma wound cover provided the best support to keratinocyte proliferation and stratification, with the number of keratinocyte strata significantly (p < 0.05) higher in comparison to all products studied, except Xenoderm. However, in contrast to Xe-Derma, Xenoderm did not significantly differ from the other dressings. The results of this in vitro study show that the brands based on porcine dermal matrix possess the strongest effect on keratinocyte proliferation and stratification. The distinctive position of Xe-Derma may be related to its composition, where natural dermal fibers form a smooth surface, similar to the basement membrane. Furthermore, the results indicate that in vitro evaluation of effects on epithelial growth may accelerate the development of new bio-engineering-based wound covers.
Department of Plastic Surgery Bulovka Hospital Charles University Prague Prague Czech Republic
Prague Burn Centre 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Prague Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15008690
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210310085818.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 150305s2014 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1177/2041731414554966 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)25383177
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Matoušková, Eva $u Prague Burn Centre, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. $7 stk2007393935
- 245 14
- $a The effect of different biologic and biosynthetic wound covers on keratinocyte growth, stratification and differentiation in vitro / $c E. Matoušková, O. Mestak,
- 520 9_
- $a The purpose of this study was to compare, by means of in vitro cultivation technique, five marketed brands of wound covers used in the treatment of burns and other skin defects (Biobrane(®), Suprathel(®), Veloderm(®), Xe-Derma(®), and Xenoderm(®)) for their ability to stimulate the keratinocyte growth, stratification, and differentiation. In three independent experiments, human keratinocytes were grown on the tested covers in organotypic cultures by the 3T3 feeder layer technique. Vertical paraffin sections of the wound covers with keratinocytes were processed using hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunostaining for involucrin. Keratinocyte populations on the dressings were assessed for (1) number of keratinocyte strata (primary variable), (2) quantitative growth, (3) thickness of the keratinocyte layer, and (4) cell differentiation. The Xe-Derma wound cover provided the best support to keratinocyte proliferation and stratification, with the number of keratinocyte strata significantly (p < 0.05) higher in comparison to all products studied, except Xenoderm. However, in contrast to Xe-Derma, Xenoderm did not significantly differ from the other dressings. The results of this in vitro study show that the brands based on porcine dermal matrix possess the strongest effect on keratinocyte proliferation and stratification. The distinctive position of Xe-Derma may be related to its composition, where natural dermal fibers form a smooth surface, similar to the basement membrane. Furthermore, the results indicate that in vitro evaluation of effects on epithelial growth may accelerate the development of new bio-engineering-based wound covers.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Měšťák, Ondřej $u Department of Plastic Surgery, Bulovka Hospital, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. $7 xx0175742
- 773 0_
- $w MED00186364 $t Journal of tissue engineering $x 2041-7314 $g Roč. 5, č. - (2014), s. 2041731414554966
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25383177 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20150305 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210310085814 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1065963 $s 891490
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 5 $c - $d 2041731414554966 $i 2041-7314 $m Journal of tissue engineering $n J Tissue Eng $x MED00186364
- GRA __
- $a NT11392 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20150305