Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Molecular testing in lung cancer in the era of precision medicine

HH. Popper, A. Ryska, J. Tímár, W. Olszewski,

. 2014 ; 3 (5) : 291-300.

Jazyk angličtina Země Tchaj-wan

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc15014641

The clinical expectations how pathologists should submit lung cancer diagnosis have changed dramatically. Until mid 90-ties a clear separation between small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) was mostly sufficient. With the invention of antiangiogenic treatment a differentiation between squamous and non-squamous NSCLC was requested. When epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation was detected in patients with pulmonary adenocarcinomas and subsequent specific treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was invented, sub-classification of NSCLC and molecular analysis of the tumor tissue for mutations was asked for. Pathologists no longer submit just a diagnosis, but instead are involved in a multidisciplinary team for lung cancer patient management. After EGFR several other driver genes such as echinoderm microtubule associated protein like 4-AL-Kinase 1 (EML4-ALK1), c-ros oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1), discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (DDR2), fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) were discovered, and more to come. Due to new developments in bronchology (EUS, EBUS) the amount of tissue submitted for diagnosis and molecular analysis is decreasing, however, the genes to be analyzed are increasing. Many of these driver gene aberrations are inversions or translocations and thus require FISH analysis. Each of these analyses requires a certain amount of tumor cells or one to two tissue sections from an already limited amount of tissues or cells. In this respect new genetic test systems have been introduced such as next generation sequencing, which enables not only to detect multiple mutations in different genes, but also amplifications and fusion genes. As soon as these methods have been validated for routine molecular analysis this will enable the analysis of multiple genetic changes simultaneously. In this review we will focus on genetic aberrations in NSCLC, resistance to new target therapies, and also to methodological requirements for a meaningful evaluation of lung cancer tissue and cells.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15014641
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20150611111206.0
007      
ta
008      
150420s2014 ch f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2014.10.01 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25806314
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ch
100    1_
$a Popper, Helmut H $u 1 Research Unit for Molecular Lung & Pleura Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Austria ; 2 The Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic ; 3 Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Molecular Oncology Research Group, HAS-SU, Budapest, Hungary ; 4 Department of Pathology, Cancer Center, 5 Roentgen Str. 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
245    10
$a Molecular testing in lung cancer in the era of precision medicine / $c HH. Popper, A. Ryska, J. Tímár, W. Olszewski,
520    9_
$a The clinical expectations how pathologists should submit lung cancer diagnosis have changed dramatically. Until mid 90-ties a clear separation between small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) was mostly sufficient. With the invention of antiangiogenic treatment a differentiation between squamous and non-squamous NSCLC was requested. When epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation was detected in patients with pulmonary adenocarcinomas and subsequent specific treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was invented, sub-classification of NSCLC and molecular analysis of the tumor tissue for mutations was asked for. Pathologists no longer submit just a diagnosis, but instead are involved in a multidisciplinary team for lung cancer patient management. After EGFR several other driver genes such as echinoderm microtubule associated protein like 4-AL-Kinase 1 (EML4-ALK1), c-ros oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1), discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (DDR2), fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) were discovered, and more to come. Due to new developments in bronchology (EUS, EBUS) the amount of tissue submitted for diagnosis and molecular analysis is decreasing, however, the genes to be analyzed are increasing. Many of these driver gene aberrations are inversions or translocations and thus require FISH analysis. Each of these analyses requires a certain amount of tumor cells or one to two tissue sections from an already limited amount of tissues or cells. In this respect new genetic test systems have been introduced such as next generation sequencing, which enables not only to detect multiple mutations in different genes, but also amplifications and fusion genes. As soon as these methods have been validated for routine molecular analysis this will enable the analysis of multiple genetic changes simultaneously. In this review we will focus on genetic aberrations in NSCLC, resistance to new target therapies, and also to methodological requirements for a meaningful evaluation of lung cancer tissue and cells.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Ryska, Ales $u 1 Research Unit for Molecular Lung & Pleura Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Austria ; 2 The Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic ; 3 Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Molecular Oncology Research Group, HAS-SU, Budapest, Hungary ; 4 Department of Pathology, Cancer Center, 5 Roentgen Str. 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
700    1_
$a Tímár, József $u 1 Research Unit for Molecular Lung & Pleura Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Austria ; 2 The Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic ; 3 Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Molecular Oncology Research Group, HAS-SU, Budapest, Hungary ; 4 Department of Pathology, Cancer Center, 5 Roentgen Str. 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
700    1_
$a Olszewski, Wlodzimierz $u 1 Research Unit for Molecular Lung & Pleura Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Austria ; 2 The Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic ; 3 Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Molecular Oncology Research Group, HAS-SU, Budapest, Hungary ; 4 Department of Pathology, Cancer Center, 5 Roentgen Str. 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
773    0_
$w MED00186389 $t Translational lung cancer research $x 2218-6751 $g Roč. 3, č. 5 (2014), s. 291-300
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25806314 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20150420 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20150611111555 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1072222 $s 897519
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 3 $c 5 $d 291-300 $i 2218-6751 $m Translational lung cancer research $n Transl Lung Cancer Res $x MED00186389
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20150420

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...