• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Phylogenetic relationships and systematic position of the families Cortrematidae and Phaneropsolidae (Platyhelminthes: Digenea)

G. Kanarek, G. Zaleśny, J. Sitko, VV. Tkach

. 2014 ; 61 (6) : 523-528.

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc15016506

The systematic position and phylogenetic relationships of the family Cortrematidae Yamaguti, 1958 have always been controversial. In the present study, the phylogenetic relationships of this family and its constituent genera and families within the superfamily Microphalloidea were evaluated using previously published and newly obtained sequences of 28S rDNA of Cortrema magnicaudata (Bykhovskaya-Pavlovskaya, 1950) (Cortrematidae), Phaneropsolus praomydis Baer, 1971 and Microtrema barusi Sitko, 2013 (Phaneropsolidae). Results clearly demonstrate that the genus Cortrema Tang, 1951 is closest to Gyrabascus Macy 1935, both genera forming one of the clades within the family Pleurogenidae in the superfamily Microphalloidea and sharing several important morphological features. Thus, the family Cortrematidae should be considered among synonyms of the Pleurogenidae. Based on the analysis of morphology, C. corti Tang, 1951, C. testilobata (Bykhovskaya-Pavlovskaya, 1953) and C. niloticus Ashour, Ahmed et Lewis, 1994 are considered junior synonyms of C. magnicaudata. The phylogenetic position of P. praomydis as a family-level branch not showing close relationships with other families of the Microphalloidea, supports the status of the Phaneropsolidae as an independent family. The genus Parabascus Looss, 1907 previously considered within the Phaneropsolidae clearly belongs to the Pleurogenidae. In addition, the molecular phylogeny has demonstrated that the recently described phaneropsolid Microtrema barusi belongs to the microphallid genus Microphallus Ward, 1901. Therefore, Microtrema Sitko, 2013 is considered a junior synonym of Microphallus. Our analysis has also confirmed the status of Collyriclidae as a family within the Microphalloidea. Not yet sequenced representatives of other families within the Microphalloidea (e.g. Anenterotrematidae, Eumegacetidae, Renschtrematidae, Stomylotrematidae, etc.) need to be included in future molecular phylogenetic studies to better unravel the taxonomic structure and content of this diverse digenean superfamily.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15016506
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20150512074255.0
007      
ta
008      
150506s2014 xr f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.14411/fp.2014.057 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25651693
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Kanarek, Gerard $u Ornithological Station, Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Gdańsk, Poland
245    10
$a Phylogenetic relationships and systematic position of the families Cortrematidae and Phaneropsolidae (Platyhelminthes: Digenea) / $c G. Kanarek, G. Zaleśny, J. Sitko, VV. Tkach
520    9_
$a The systematic position and phylogenetic relationships of the family Cortrematidae Yamaguti, 1958 have always been controversial. In the present study, the phylogenetic relationships of this family and its constituent genera and families within the superfamily Microphalloidea were evaluated using previously published and newly obtained sequences of 28S rDNA of Cortrema magnicaudata (Bykhovskaya-Pavlovskaya, 1950) (Cortrematidae), Phaneropsolus praomydis Baer, 1971 and Microtrema barusi Sitko, 2013 (Phaneropsolidae). Results clearly demonstrate that the genus Cortrema Tang, 1951 is closest to Gyrabascus Macy 1935, both genera forming one of the clades within the family Pleurogenidae in the superfamily Microphalloidea and sharing several important morphological features. Thus, the family Cortrematidae should be considered among synonyms of the Pleurogenidae. Based on the analysis of morphology, C. corti Tang, 1951, C. testilobata (Bykhovskaya-Pavlovskaya, 1953) and C. niloticus Ashour, Ahmed et Lewis, 1994 are considered junior synonyms of C. magnicaudata. The phylogenetic position of P. praomydis as a family-level branch not showing close relationships with other families of the Microphalloidea, supports the status of the Phaneropsolidae as an independent family. The genus Parabascus Looss, 1907 previously considered within the Phaneropsolidae clearly belongs to the Pleurogenidae. In addition, the molecular phylogeny has demonstrated that the recently described phaneropsolid Microtrema barusi belongs to the microphallid genus Microphallus Ward, 1901. Therefore, Microtrema Sitko, 2013 is considered a junior synonym of Microphallus. Our analysis has also confirmed the status of Collyriclidae as a family within the Microphalloidea. Not yet sequenced representatives of other families within the Microphalloidea (e.g. Anenterotrematidae, Eumegacetidae, Renschtrematidae, Stomylotrematidae, etc.) need to be included in future molecular phylogenetic studies to better unravel the taxonomic structure and content of this diverse digenean superfamily.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a DNA helmintů $x genetika $7 D018509
650    _2
$a fylogeneze $7 D010802
650    _2
$a ploštěnci $x klasifikace $x genetika $7 D010986
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
655    _2
$a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. $7 D013487
700    1_
$a Zaleśny, Grzegorz $u Institute of Biology, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland
700    1_
$a Sitko, Jiljí, $d 1943- $7 xx0024324 $u Comenius Museum, Přerov, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Tkach, Vasyl V. $u Department of Biology, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota, USA
773    0_
$w MED00011006 $t Folia parasitologica $x 0015-5683 $g Roč. 61, č. 6 (2014), s. 523-528
856    41
$u https://folia.paru.cas.cz/pdfs/fol/2014/06/05.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 2854 $c 558 a $y 4 $z 0
990    __
$a 20150506 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20150507141617 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1077003 $s 899403
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 61 $c 6 $d 523-528 $i 0015-5683 $m Folia parasitologica $n Folia parasitol. $x MED00011006
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20150506

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...