-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Phylogenetic relationships and systematic position of the families Cortrematidae and Phaneropsolidae (Platyhelminthes: Digenea)
G. Kanarek, G. Zaleśny, J. Sitko, VV. Tkach
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 1966
ProQuest Central
od 2004-01-01 do Před 3 měsíci
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2004-01-01 do Před 3 měsíci
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2004-01-01 do Před 3 měsíci
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 1982
- MeSH
- DNA helmintů genetika MeSH
- fylogeneze MeSH
- ploštěnci klasifikace genetika MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. MeSH
The systematic position and phylogenetic relationships of the family Cortrematidae Yamaguti, 1958 have always been controversial. In the present study, the phylogenetic relationships of this family and its constituent genera and families within the superfamily Microphalloidea were evaluated using previously published and newly obtained sequences of 28S rDNA of Cortrema magnicaudata (Bykhovskaya-Pavlovskaya, 1950) (Cortrematidae), Phaneropsolus praomydis Baer, 1971 and Microtrema barusi Sitko, 2013 (Phaneropsolidae). Results clearly demonstrate that the genus Cortrema Tang, 1951 is closest to Gyrabascus Macy 1935, both genera forming one of the clades within the family Pleurogenidae in the superfamily Microphalloidea and sharing several important morphological features. Thus, the family Cortrematidae should be considered among synonyms of the Pleurogenidae. Based on the analysis of morphology, C. corti Tang, 1951, C. testilobata (Bykhovskaya-Pavlovskaya, 1953) and C. niloticus Ashour, Ahmed et Lewis, 1994 are considered junior synonyms of C. magnicaudata. The phylogenetic position of P. praomydis as a family-level branch not showing close relationships with other families of the Microphalloidea, supports the status of the Phaneropsolidae as an independent family. The genus Parabascus Looss, 1907 previously considered within the Phaneropsolidae clearly belongs to the Pleurogenidae. In addition, the molecular phylogeny has demonstrated that the recently described phaneropsolid Microtrema barusi belongs to the microphallid genus Microphallus Ward, 1901. Therefore, Microtrema Sitko, 2013 is considered a junior synonym of Microphallus. Our analysis has also confirmed the status of Collyriclidae as a family within the Microphalloidea. Not yet sequenced representatives of other families within the Microphalloidea (e.g. Anenterotrematidae, Eumegacetidae, Renschtrematidae, Stomylotrematidae, etc.) need to be included in future molecular phylogenetic studies to better unravel the taxonomic structure and content of this diverse digenean superfamily.
Comenius Museum Přerov Czech Republic
Department of Biology University of North Dakota Grand Forks North Dakota USA
Institute of Biology Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences Wrocław Poland
Ornithological Station Museum and Institute of Zoology Polish Academy of Sciences Gdańsk Poland
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15016506
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20150512074255.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 150506s2014 xr f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.14411/fp.2014.057 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)25651693
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Kanarek, Gerard $u Ornithological Station, Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Gdańsk, Poland
- 245 10
- $a Phylogenetic relationships and systematic position of the families Cortrematidae and Phaneropsolidae (Platyhelminthes: Digenea) / $c G. Kanarek, G. Zaleśny, J. Sitko, VV. Tkach
- 520 9_
- $a The systematic position and phylogenetic relationships of the family Cortrematidae Yamaguti, 1958 have always been controversial. In the present study, the phylogenetic relationships of this family and its constituent genera and families within the superfamily Microphalloidea were evaluated using previously published and newly obtained sequences of 28S rDNA of Cortrema magnicaudata (Bykhovskaya-Pavlovskaya, 1950) (Cortrematidae), Phaneropsolus praomydis Baer, 1971 and Microtrema barusi Sitko, 2013 (Phaneropsolidae). Results clearly demonstrate that the genus Cortrema Tang, 1951 is closest to Gyrabascus Macy 1935, both genera forming one of the clades within the family Pleurogenidae in the superfamily Microphalloidea and sharing several important morphological features. Thus, the family Cortrematidae should be considered among synonyms of the Pleurogenidae. Based on the analysis of morphology, C. corti Tang, 1951, C. testilobata (Bykhovskaya-Pavlovskaya, 1953) and C. niloticus Ashour, Ahmed et Lewis, 1994 are considered junior synonyms of C. magnicaudata. The phylogenetic position of P. praomydis as a family-level branch not showing close relationships with other families of the Microphalloidea, supports the status of the Phaneropsolidae as an independent family. The genus Parabascus Looss, 1907 previously considered within the Phaneropsolidae clearly belongs to the Pleurogenidae. In addition, the molecular phylogeny has demonstrated that the recently described phaneropsolid Microtrema barusi belongs to the microphallid genus Microphallus Ward, 1901. Therefore, Microtrema Sitko, 2013 is considered a junior synonym of Microphallus. Our analysis has also confirmed the status of Collyriclidae as a family within the Microphalloidea. Not yet sequenced representatives of other families within the Microphalloidea (e.g. Anenterotrematidae, Eumegacetidae, Renschtrematidae, Stomylotrematidae, etc.) need to be included in future molecular phylogenetic studies to better unravel the taxonomic structure and content of this diverse digenean superfamily.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a DNA helmintů $x genetika $7 D018509
- 650 _2
- $a fylogeneze $7 D010802
- 650 _2
- $a ploštěnci $x klasifikace $x genetika $7 D010986
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 655 _2
- $a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. $7 D013487
- 700 1_
- $a Zaleśny, Grzegorz $u Institute of Biology, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Sitko, Jiljí, $d 1943- $7 xx0024324 $u Comenius Museum, Přerov, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Tkach, Vasyl V. $u Department of Biology, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota, USA
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011006 $t Folia parasitologica $x 0015-5683 $g Roč. 61, č. 6 (2014), s. 523-528
- 856 41
- $u https://folia.paru.cas.cz/pdfs/fol/2014/06/05.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 2854 $c 558 a $y 4 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20150506 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20150507141617 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1077003 $s 899403
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 61 $c 6 $d 523-528 $i 0015-5683 $m Folia parasitologica $n Folia parasitol. $x MED00011006
- LZP __
- $b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20150506