• Something wrong with this record ?

A randomized study of hexaminolevulinate photodynamic therapy in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1/2

P. Hillemanns, F. Garcia, KU. Petry, V. Dvorak, O. Sadovsky, OE. Iversen, MH. Einstein,

. 2015 ; 212 (4) : 465.e1-7.

Language English Country United States

Document type Clinical Trial, Phase II, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of hexaminolevulinate (HAL) photodynamic therapy (PDT), a novel therapy for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)1/2, to define the appropriate population and endpoints for a phase 3 program. STUDY DESIGN: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study that included a total of 262 women with biopsy-confirmed CIN 1/2 based on local pathology. Patients received 1 or 2 topical treatments of HAL hydrochloride 0.2%, 1%, 5%, and placebo ointment and were evaluated for response after 3-6 months based on biopsy, Papanicolaou test, and oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) test. All efficacy analyses were performed on blinded central histology review to avoid interreader variability. Adverse events, blood biochemistry, and vital signs were assessed after 3 months. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between placebo and either the CIN 1 or combined CIN 1/2 populations. A clear dose effect with a statistically significant response in the HAL 5% group of 95% (18/19 patients) compared to 57% (12/21 patients) in the placebo group (P < .001) was observed at 3 months in women with CIN 2, including an encouraging 83% (5/6 patients) clearance of HPV 16/18 compared to 33% (2/6 patients) in the placebo group at 6 months. The treatment was easy to use and well accepted by patients and gynecologists. Only local self-limiting adverse reactions including discharge, discomfort, and spotting were reported. CONCLUSION: HAL PDT is a novel therapy that shows promise in the treatment of CIN 2 including clearance of oncogenic HPV, but not of CIN 1. The positive risk/benefit balance makes HAL PDT a tissue-preserving alternative in women of childbearing age who wish to preserve the cervix. Confirmatory studies are planned.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15022913
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20150722125744.0
007      
ta
008      
150709s2015 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.1107 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25467012
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Hillemanns, Peter $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: Hillemanns.Peter@mh-hannover.de.
245    12
$a A randomized study of hexaminolevulinate photodynamic therapy in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1/2 / $c P. Hillemanns, F. Garcia, KU. Petry, V. Dvorak, O. Sadovsky, OE. Iversen, MH. Einstein,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of hexaminolevulinate (HAL) photodynamic therapy (PDT), a novel therapy for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)1/2, to define the appropriate population and endpoints for a phase 3 program. STUDY DESIGN: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study that included a total of 262 women with biopsy-confirmed CIN 1/2 based on local pathology. Patients received 1 or 2 topical treatments of HAL hydrochloride 0.2%, 1%, 5%, and placebo ointment and were evaluated for response after 3-6 months based on biopsy, Papanicolaou test, and oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) test. All efficacy analyses were performed on blinded central histology review to avoid interreader variability. Adverse events, blood biochemistry, and vital signs were assessed after 3 months. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between placebo and either the CIN 1 or combined CIN 1/2 populations. A clear dose effect with a statistically significant response in the HAL 5% group of 95% (18/19 patients) compared to 57% (12/21 patients) in the placebo group (P < .001) was observed at 3 months in women with CIN 2, including an encouraging 83% (5/6 patients) clearance of HPV 16/18 compared to 33% (2/6 patients) in the placebo group at 6 months. The treatment was easy to use and well accepted by patients and gynecologists. Only local self-limiting adverse reactions including discharge, discomfort, and spotting were reported. CONCLUSION: HAL PDT is a novel therapy that shows promise in the treatment of CIN 2 including clearance of oncogenic HPV, but not of CIN 1. The positive risk/benefit balance makes HAL PDT a tissue-preserving alternative in women of childbearing age who wish to preserve the cervix. Confirmatory studies are planned.
650    _2
$a aplikace lokální $7 D000287
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a kyselina aminolevulová $x analogy a deriváty $x terapeutické užití $7 D000622
650    _2
$a dysplazie děložního hrdla $x farmakoterapie $x patologie $7 D002578
650    _2
$a vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva $7 D004305
650    _2
$a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
650    _2
$a rozvrh dávkování léků $7 D004334
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a analýza podle původního léčebného záměru $7 D057194
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a fotochemoterapie $7 D010778
650    _2
$a fotosenzibilizující látky $x terapeutické užití $7 D017319
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a nádory děložního čípku $x farmakoterapie $x patologie $7 D002583
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky, fáze II $7 D017427
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Garcia, Francisco $u Center of Excellence in Women's Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
700    1_
$a Petry, Karl Ulrich $u Clinic for Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Gynecological Oncology, Clinic of the City of Wolfsburg, Wolfsburg, Germany.
700    1_
$a Dvorak, Vladimír $u Center of Outpatient Gynecology Clinic and Primary Care, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Sadovsky, Oliver $u private practice, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
700    1_
$a Iversen, Ole-Erik $u Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen and Women's Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
700    1_
$a Einstein, Mark H $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
773    0_
$w MED00000270 $t American journal of obstetrics and gynecology $x 1097-6868 $g Roč. 212, č. 4 (2015), s. 465.e1-7
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25467012 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20150709 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20150722125822 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1083252 $s 905906
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 212 $c 4 $d 465.e1-7 $i 1097-6868 $m American journal of obstetrics and gynecology $n Am J Obstet Gynecol $x MED00000270
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20150709

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...