• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

New pasture plants intensify invasive species risk

DA. Driscoll, JA. Catford, JN. Barney, PE. Hulme, . Inderjit, TG. Martin, A. Pauchard, P. Pyšek, DM. Richardson, S. Riley, V. Visser,

. 2014 ; 111 (46) : 16622-7.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc15022942
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK Free Medical Journals od 1915 do Před 6 měsíci
Freely Accessible Science Journals od 1915 do Před 6 měsíci
PubMed Central od 1915 do Před 6 měsíci
Europe PubMed Central od 1915 do Před 6 měsíci
Open Access Digital Library od 1915-01-15
Open Access Digital Library od 1915-01-01

Odkazy

PubMed 25368175
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1409347111
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

Agricultural intensification is critical to meet global food demand, but intensification threatens native species and degrades ecosystems. Sustainable intensification (SI) is heralded as a new approach for enabling growth in agriculture while minimizing environmental impacts. However, the SI literature has overlooked a major environmental risk. Using data from eight countries on six continents, we show that few governments regulate conventionally bred pasture taxa to limit threats to natural areas, even though most agribusinesses promote taxa with substantial weed risk. New pasture taxa (including species, subspecies, varieties, cultivars, and plant-endophyte combinations) are bred with characteristics typical of invasive species and environmental weeds. By introducing novel genetic and endophyte variation, pasture taxa are imbued with additional capacity for invasion and environmental impact. New strategies to prevent future problems are urgently needed. We highlight opportunities for researchers, agribusiness, and consumers to reduce environmental risks associated with new pasture taxa. We also emphasize four main approaches that governments could consider as they build new policies to limit weed risks, including (i) national lists of taxa that are prohibited based on environmental risk; (ii) a weed risk assessment for all new taxa; (iii) a program to rapidly detect and control new taxa that invade natural areas; and (iv) the polluter-pays principle, so that if a taxon becomes an environmental weed, industry pays for its management. There is mounting pressure to increase livestock production. With foresight and planning, growth in agriculture can be achieved sustainably provided that the scope of SI expands to encompass environmental weed risks.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15022942
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20150727122241.0
007      
ta
008      
150709s2014 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1073/pnas.1409347111 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25368175
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Driscoll, Don A $u National Environmental Research Program Environmental Decisions Group and ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Australia; Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; don.driscoll@anu.edu.au.
245    10
$a New pasture plants intensify invasive species risk / $c DA. Driscoll, JA. Catford, JN. Barney, PE. Hulme, . Inderjit, TG. Martin, A. Pauchard, P. Pyšek, DM. Richardson, S. Riley, V. Visser,
520    9_
$a Agricultural intensification is critical to meet global food demand, but intensification threatens native species and degrades ecosystems. Sustainable intensification (SI) is heralded as a new approach for enabling growth in agriculture while minimizing environmental impacts. However, the SI literature has overlooked a major environmental risk. Using data from eight countries on six continents, we show that few governments regulate conventionally bred pasture taxa to limit threats to natural areas, even though most agribusinesses promote taxa with substantial weed risk. New pasture taxa (including species, subspecies, varieties, cultivars, and plant-endophyte combinations) are bred with characteristics typical of invasive species and environmental weeds. By introducing novel genetic and endophyte variation, pasture taxa are imbued with additional capacity for invasion and environmental impact. New strategies to prevent future problems are urgently needed. We highlight opportunities for researchers, agribusiness, and consumers to reduce environmental risks associated with new pasture taxa. We also emphasize four main approaches that governments could consider as they build new policies to limit weed risks, including (i) national lists of taxa that are prohibited based on environmental risk; (ii) a weed risk assessment for all new taxa; (iii) a program to rapidly detect and control new taxa that invade natural areas; and (iv) the polluter-pays principle, so that if a taxon becomes an environmental weed, industry pays for its management. There is mounting pressure to increase livestock production. With foresight and planning, growth in agriculture can be achieved sustainably provided that the scope of SI expands to encompass environmental weed risks.
650    _2
$a krmivo pro zvířata $x ekonomika $x zásobování a distribuce $7 D000821
650    12
$a chov zvířat $x trendy $7 D000822
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a hospodářská zvířata $7 D000829
650    _2
$a zachování přírodních zdrojů $7 D003247
650    12
$a zemědělské plodiny $7 D018556
650    _2
$a životní prostředí $7 D004777
650    _2
$a zásobování potravinami $7 D005523
650    _2
$a vládní programy $x organizace a řízení $7 D006078
650    12
$a vládní regulace $7 D033161
650    _2
$a býložravci $7 D060434
650    12
$a zavlečené druhy $x ekonomika $x zákonodárství a právo $7 D058865
650    12
$a plevel $7 D057685
650    _2
$a veřejná politika $7 D011640
650    _2
$a chování snižující riziko $7 D040242
650    _2
$a druhová specificita $7 D013045
650    _2
$a kontrola plevele $x ekonomika $x zákonodárství a právo $x metody $7 D058728
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Catford, Jane A $u National Environmental Research Program Environmental Decisions Group and ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Australia; Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; School of Botany, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia; Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108;
700    1_
$a Barney, Jacob N $u Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061;
700    1_
$a Hulme, Philip E $u Bio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand;
700    1_
$a Inderjit, $u Department of Environmental Studies and Centre for Environmental Management of Degraded Ecosystems, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India;
700    1_
$a Martin, Tara G $u National Environmental Research Program Environmental Decisions Group and ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Australia; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Land and Water, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia;
700    1_
$a Pauchard, Aníbal $u Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Concepción, Casilla 160-C, Concepción, Chile; Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity, Chile;
700    1_
$a Pyšek, Petr $u Institute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-25243 Průhonice, Czech Republic; Department of Ecology, Charles University in Prague, CZ-12844 Prague, Czech Republic;
700    1_
$a Richardson, David M $u Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland 7602, South Africa; and.
700    1_
$a Riley, Sophie $u Faculty of Law, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.
700    1_
$a Visser, Vernon $u Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland 7602, South Africa; and.
773    0_
$w MED00010472 $t Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America $x 1091-6490 $g Roč. 111, č. 46 (2014), s. 16622-7
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25368175 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20150709 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20150727122325 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1083281 $s 905935
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 111 $c 46 $d 16622-7 $i 1091-6490 $m Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America $n Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A $x MED00010472
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20150709
Zpět

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace