Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Genomic repeat abundances contain phylogenetic signal

S. Dodsworth, MW. Chase, LJ. Kelly, IJ. Leitch, J. Macas, P. Novák, M. Piednoël, H. Weiss-Schneeweiss, AR. Leitch,

. 2015 ; 64 (1) : 112-26.

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

A large proportion of genomic information, particularly repetitive elements, is usually ignored when researchers are using next-generation sequencing. Here we demonstrate the usefulness of this repetitive fraction in phylogenetic analyses, utilizing comparative graph-based clustering of next-generation sequence reads, which results in abundance estimates of different classes of genomic repeats. Phylogenetic trees are then inferred based on the genome-wide abundance of different repeat types treated as continuously varying characters; such repeats are scattered across chromosomes and in angiosperms can constitute a majority of nuclear genomic DNA. In six diverse examples, five angiosperms and one insect, this method provides generally well-supported relationships at interspecific and intergeneric levels that agree with results from more standard phylogenetic analyses of commonly used markers. We propose that this methodology may prove especially useful in groups where there is little genetic differentiation in standard phylogenetic markers. At the same time as providing data for phylogenetic inference, this method additionally yields a wealth of data for comparative studies of genome evolution.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15022998
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20150727103600.0
007      
ta
008      
150709s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/sysbio/syu080 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25261464
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Dodsworth, Steven $u School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK; Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK; School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley WA 6009, Australia; Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, Biology Centre ASCR, Branišovská 31, České Budějovice, CZ-37005, Czech Republic; Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; and Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, A-1030 Vienna, Austria School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK; Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK; School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley WA 6009, Australia; Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, Biology Centre ASCR, Branišovská 31, České Budějovice, CZ-37005, Czech Republic; Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; and Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, A-1030 Vienna, Austria.
245    10
$a Genomic repeat abundances contain phylogenetic signal / $c S. Dodsworth, MW. Chase, LJ. Kelly, IJ. Leitch, J. Macas, P. Novák, M. Piednoël, H. Weiss-Schneeweiss, AR. Leitch,
520    9_
$a A large proportion of genomic information, particularly repetitive elements, is usually ignored when researchers are using next-generation sequencing. Here we demonstrate the usefulness of this repetitive fraction in phylogenetic analyses, utilizing comparative graph-based clustering of next-generation sequence reads, which results in abundance estimates of different classes of genomic repeats. Phylogenetic trees are then inferred based on the genome-wide abundance of different repeat types treated as continuously varying characters; such repeats are scattered across chromosomes and in angiosperms can constitute a majority of nuclear genomic DNA. In six diverse examples, five angiosperms and one insect, this method provides generally well-supported relationships at interspecific and intergeneric levels that agree with results from more standard phylogenetic analyses of commonly used markers. We propose that this methodology may prove especially useful in groups where there is little genetic differentiation in standard phylogenetic markers. At the same time as providing data for phylogenetic inference, this method additionally yields a wealth of data for comparative studies of genome evolution.
650    _2
$a Magnoliopsida $x genetika $7 D019684
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a shluková analýza $7 D016000
650    _2
$a DNA rostlinná $x genetika $7 D018744
650    _2
$a Drosophila $x klasifikace $x genetika $7 D004330
650    _2
$a hmyzí geny $x genetika $7 D017344
650    _2
$a genom $x genetika $7 D016678
650    12
$a fylogeneze $7 D010802
650    _2
$a repetitivní sekvence nukleových kyselin $x genetika $7 D012091
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Chase, Mark W $u School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK; Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK; School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley WA 6009, Australia; Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, Biology Centre ASCR, Branišovská 31, České Budějovice, CZ-37005, Czech Republic; Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; and Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, A-1030 Vienna, Austria School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK; Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK; School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley WA 6009, Australia; Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, Biology Centre ASCR, Branišovská 31, České Budějovice, CZ-37005, Czech Republic; Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; and Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, A-1030 Vienna, Austria.
700    1_
$a Kelly, Laura J $u School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK; Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK; School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley WA 6009, Australia; Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, Biology Centre ASCR, Branišovská 31, České Budějovice, CZ-37005, Czech Republic; Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; and Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, A-1030 Vienna, Austria School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK; Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK; School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley WA 6009, Australia; Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, Biology Centre ASCR, Branišovská 31, České Budějovice, CZ-37005, Czech Republic; Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; and Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, A-1030 Vienna, Austria.
700    1_
$a Leitch, Ilia J $u School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK; Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK; School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley WA 6009, Australia; Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, Biology Centre ASCR, Branišovská 31, České Budějovice, CZ-37005, Czech Republic; Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; and Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, A-1030 Vienna, Austria.
700    1_
$a Macas, Jiří $u School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK; Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK; School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley WA 6009, Australia; Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, Biology Centre ASCR, Branišovská 31, České Budějovice, CZ-37005, Czech Republic; Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; and Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, A-1030 Vienna, Austria.
700    1_
$a Novák, Petr $u School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK; Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK; School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley WA 6009, Australia; Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, Biology Centre ASCR, Branišovská 31, České Budějovice, CZ-37005, Czech Republic; Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; and Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, A-1030 Vienna, Austria.
700    1_
$a Piednoël, Mathieu $u School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK; Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK; School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley WA 6009, Australia; Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, Biology Centre ASCR, Branišovská 31, České Budějovice, CZ-37005, Czech Republic; Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; and Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, A-1030 Vienna, Austria.
700    1_
$a Weiss-Schneeweiss, Hanna $u School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK; Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK; School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley WA 6009, Australia; Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, Biology Centre ASCR, Branišovská 31, České Budějovice, CZ-37005, Czech Republic; Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; and Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, A-1030 Vienna, Austria.
700    1_
$a Leitch, Andrew R $u School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK; Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK; School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley WA 6009, Australia; Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, Biology Centre ASCR, Branišovská 31, České Budějovice, CZ-37005, Czech Republic; Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; and Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, A-1030 Vienna, Austria a.r.leitch@qmul.ac.uk.
773    0_
$w MED00005998 $t Systematic biology $x 1076-836X $g Roč. 64, č. 1 (2015), s. 112-26
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25261464 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20150709 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20150727103643 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1083337 $s 905991
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 64 $c 1 $d 112-26 $i 1076-836X $m Systematic biology $n Syst Biol $x MED00005998
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20150709

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...