• Something wrong with this record ?

Life-history implications of the allometric scaling of growth

DS. Boukal, U. Dieckmann, K. Enberg, M. Heino, C. Jørgensen,

. 2014 ; 359 (-) : 199-207.

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Several phenomenological descriptions, such as the von Bertalanffy growth model, have been widely used to describe size-at-age and individual growth across a diverse range of organisms. However, for modelling life histories, as opposed to just growth, biologically and mechanistically meaningful growth models, based on allocation decisions, have become increasingly important. This is because fitness is determined by survival and reproduction, which are not addressed directly in phenomenological growth models. To elucidate these considerations, we take as a starting point the biphasic growth model by Quince et al. (2008a, J. Theor. Biol. 254:197) which has the advantage that the underlying allometric scaling of net energy intake can be freely chosen. First, we reformulate this model such that individual size is given in meaningful units of length and weight, facilitating the model׳s interpretation and application. Second, we show that even though different allometric scaling relationships can produce practically identical growth trajectories, the accompanying reproductive investments are highly dependent on the chosen allometric exponent. Third, we demonstrate how this dependence has dramatic consequences for evolutionary predictions, in particular with regard to the age and size at maturation. These findings have considerable practical relevance, because empirically observed allometric exponents are often uncertain and systematically differ from those assumed in current standard growth models.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15023366
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20150729101942.0
007      
ta
008      
150709s2014 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.05.022 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)24878109
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Boukal, David S $u Department of Ecosystems Biology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, CZ-37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic; Laboratory of Aquatic Insects and Relict Ecosystems, Institute of Entomology, Biology Centre AS CR, Branišovská 31, CZ-37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Life-history implications of the allometric scaling of growth / $c DS. Boukal, U. Dieckmann, K. Enberg, M. Heino, C. Jørgensen,
520    9_
$a Several phenomenological descriptions, such as the von Bertalanffy growth model, have been widely used to describe size-at-age and individual growth across a diverse range of organisms. However, for modelling life histories, as opposed to just growth, biologically and mechanistically meaningful growth models, based on allocation decisions, have become increasingly important. This is because fitness is determined by survival and reproduction, which are not addressed directly in phenomenological growth models. To elucidate these considerations, we take as a starting point the biphasic growth model by Quince et al. (2008a, J. Theor. Biol. 254:197) which has the advantage that the underlying allometric scaling of net energy intake can be freely chosen. First, we reformulate this model such that individual size is given in meaningful units of length and weight, facilitating the model׳s interpretation and application. Second, we show that even though different allometric scaling relationships can produce practically identical growth trajectories, the accompanying reproductive investments are highly dependent on the chosen allometric exponent. Third, we demonstrate how this dependence has dramatic consequences for evolutionary predictions, in particular with regard to the age and size at maturation. These findings have considerable practical relevance, because empirically observed allometric exponents are often uncertain and systematically differ from those assumed in current standard growth models.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    12
$a velikost těla $7 D049628
650    12
$a tělesné váhy a míry $7 D001837
650    _2
$a životní prostředí $7 D004777
650    _2
$a genetická zdatnost $7 D056084
650    _2
$a růst $x fyziologie $7 D006128
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a teoretické modely $7 D008962
650    _2
$a rozmnožování $x fyziologie $7 D012098
650    _2
$a druhová specificita $7 D013045
650    _2
$a přežití $7 D013534
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Dieckmann, Ulf $u Evolution and Ecology Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria.
700    1_
$a Enberg, Katja $u Hjort Centre for Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Institute of Marine Research, N-5817 Bergen, Norway. Electronic address: katja.enberg@imr.no.
700    1_
$a Heino, Mikko $u Hjort Centre for Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Department of Biology, University of Bergen, N-5020 Bergen, Norway; Evolution and Ecology Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria; Hjort Centre for Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Institute of Marine Research, N-5817 Bergen, Norway.
700    1_
$a Jørgensen, Christian $u Hjort Centre for Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Uni Research, N-5020 Bergen, Norway.
773    0_
$w MED00003018 $t Journal of theoretical biology $x 1095-8541 $g Roč. 359, č. - (2014), s. 199-207
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24878109 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20150709 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20150729102028 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1083704 $s 906359
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 359 $c - $d 199-207 $i 1095-8541 $m Journal of theoretical biology $n J Theor Biol $x MED00003018
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20150709

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...