Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Vliv sterilizace formaldehydem, gama zářením a etylenoxidem na vlastnosti polyetylenových komponent kloubních náhrad
[Effect of sterilisation with formaldehyde, gamma irradiation and ethylene oxide on the properties of polyethylene joint replacement components]

P. Fulín, D. Pokorný, M. Slouf, T. Vacková, J. Dybal, A. Sosna

. 2014 ; 81 (1) : 33-39.

Jazyk čeština Země Česko

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, anglický abstrakt, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc15030941

Grantová podpora
NT12229 MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

Odkazy

PubMed 24755055

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Each method of sterilisation has some effect on the structure and properties of UHMWPE and thus also on joint replacement longevity. This study was designed to compare, using objective methods of measurement, several kinds of sterilisation and to recommend the one which has the best prospect for making joint replacements last longer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two groups of UHMWPE samples were tested. Group 1 included virgin GUR 1020 polyethylene, non-modified and non-sterilised (Meditech, Germany). Group 2 comprised of three sets of samples sterilised with formaldehyde, gamma irradiation and ethylene oxide, respectively. In both groups, physicochemical properties were assessed by infrared spectroscopy (IR), and the oxidation (OI) and trans-vinyl (VI) indices, which show the degree of oxidation of a material, were determined. Free-radical concentrations were measured by the method of electron spin resonance (ESR). The mechanical properties of each sample were studied using small punch tests (SPT) and testing microhardness (MH). Any change in mechanical properties can affect, to various degrees, the quality and longevity of a prosthetic joint. RESULTS: The samples sterilised by gamma irradiation showed higher values of both the OI (0.37) and the VI index (0.038) than the other samples (OI, 0.02 to 0.05 and VI, 0). Also, the free-radical concentration was detectable only in the gamma-sterilised sample. Values obtained for mechanical properties were as follows: peak load in the range of 58.48 N (gamma irradiation) to 59.60 N (ethylene oxide); ultimate load in the range of 46.69 N (gamma irradiation) to 57.50 N (ethylene oxide); ultimate displacement in the range of 4.29 mm (gamma irradiation) to 4.58 mm (virgin polyethylene and formaldehyde); and work to failure in the range of 185.18 mJ (gamma irradiation) to 205.89 mJ (virgin polyethylene). Microhardness values were obtained in the following ranges: 41.2 to 44.6 MPa (virgin polyethylene); 40.2 to 44.1 MPa (formaldehyde); 46.1 to 49.3 MPa (gamma irradiation); and 40.3 to 44.2 MPa (ethylene oxide). DISCUSSION: The samples sterilised with formaldehyde and ethylene oxide have mechanical properties very similar to virgin polyethylene, they are not damaged by oxidation and do not contain free radicals. Owing to these characteristics, the immediate and long-term oxidation stability of the three samples is higher. The sample sterilised by gamma irradiation showed the presence of free radicals and immediate and long-term oxidative degradation. This results in the deterioration of mechanical properties and the growth of crystallinity due to enhanced oxidation and leads to higher polyethylene microhardness. CONCLUSIONS: Sterilisation with gamma irradiation results in oxidative degradation and mechanical property deterioration, which is one of the potential risks of a shorter life span of joint replacements. The use of ethylene oxide or formaldehyde does not change polymer properties nor has any effect on oxidation of materials. Therefore, a longer life expectancy of the joint replacements sterilised with ethylene oxide can be expected. The life span of their joint replacements is a key issue for the patients. Prosthetic joint loosening is painful and the patient often requires re-implantation. A higher number of re-implantations is associated with higher costs for the institution involved and, consequently, for the whole health care system. Although this study basically deals with chemical issues, it informs the surgeon of the latest developments leading to the improvement of implanted materials, which can increase the life expectancy of joint replacements and patients' satisfaction.

Effect of sterilisation with formaldehyde, gamma irradiation and ethylene oxide on the properties of polyethylene joint replacement components

Bibliografie atd.

Literatura

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15030941
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240117103545.0
007      
ta
008      
151001s2014 xr ad f 000 0|cze||
009      
AR
024    7_
$2 doi $a 10.55095/achot2014/003
035    __
$a (PubMed)24755055
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Fulín, Petr $7 xx0231618 $u I. ortopedická klinika 1. LF UK a FN Motol, Praha
245    10
$a Vliv sterilizace formaldehydem, gama zářením a etylenoxidem na vlastnosti polyetylenových komponent kloubních náhrad / $c P. Fulín, D. Pokorný, M. Slouf, T. Vacková, J. Dybal, A. Sosna
246    31
$a Effect of sterilisation with formaldehyde, gamma irradiation and ethylene oxide on the properties of polyethylene joint replacement components
504    __
$a Literatura
520    9_
$a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Each method of sterilisation has some effect on the structure and properties of UHMWPE and thus also on joint replacement longevity. This study was designed to compare, using objective methods of measurement, several kinds of sterilisation and to recommend the one which has the best prospect for making joint replacements last longer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two groups of UHMWPE samples were tested. Group 1 included virgin GUR 1020 polyethylene, non-modified and non-sterilised (Meditech, Germany). Group 2 comprised of three sets of samples sterilised with formaldehyde, gamma irradiation and ethylene oxide, respectively. In both groups, physicochemical properties were assessed by infrared spectroscopy (IR), and the oxidation (OI) and trans-vinyl (VI) indices, which show the degree of oxidation of a material, were determined. Free-radical concentrations were measured by the method of electron spin resonance (ESR). The mechanical properties of each sample were studied using small punch tests (SPT) and testing microhardness (MH). Any change in mechanical properties can affect, to various degrees, the quality and longevity of a prosthetic joint. RESULTS: The samples sterilised by gamma irradiation showed higher values of both the OI (0.37) and the VI index (0.038) than the other samples (OI, 0.02 to 0.05 and VI, 0). Also, the free-radical concentration was detectable only in the gamma-sterilised sample. Values obtained for mechanical properties were as follows: peak load in the range of 58.48 N (gamma irradiation) to 59.60 N (ethylene oxide); ultimate load in the range of 46.69 N (gamma irradiation) to 57.50 N (ethylene oxide); ultimate displacement in the range of 4.29 mm (gamma irradiation) to 4.58 mm (virgin polyethylene and formaldehyde); and work to failure in the range of 185.18 mJ (gamma irradiation) to 205.89 mJ (virgin polyethylene). Microhardness values were obtained in the following ranges: 41.2 to 44.6 MPa (virgin polyethylene); 40.2 to 44.1 MPa (formaldehyde); 46.1 to 49.3 MPa (gamma irradiation); and 40.3 to 44.2 MPa (ethylene oxide). DISCUSSION: The samples sterilised with formaldehyde and ethylene oxide have mechanical properties very similar to virgin polyethylene, they are not damaged by oxidation and do not contain free radicals. Owing to these characteristics, the immediate and long-term oxidation stability of the three samples is higher. The sample sterilised by gamma irradiation showed the presence of free radicals and immediate and long-term oxidative degradation. This results in the deterioration of mechanical properties and the growth of crystallinity due to enhanced oxidation and leads to higher polyethylene microhardness. CONCLUSIONS: Sterilisation with gamma irradiation results in oxidative degradation and mechanical property deterioration, which is one of the potential risks of a shorter life span of joint replacements. The use of ethylene oxide or formaldehyde does not change polymer properties nor has any effect on oxidation of materials. Therefore, a longer life expectancy of the joint replacements sterilised with ethylene oxide can be expected. The life span of their joint replacements is a key issue for the patients. Prosthetic joint loosening is painful and the patient often requires re-implantation. A higher number of re-implantations is associated with higher costs for the institution involved and, consequently, for the whole health care system. Although this study basically deals with chemical issues, it informs the surgeon of the latest developments leading to the improvement of implanted materials, which can increase the life expectancy of joint replacements and patients' satisfaction.
650    _2
$a artroplastiky kloubů $x metody $7 D019643
650    _2
$a srovnávací výzkum účinnosti $7 D057186
650    _2
$a ethylenoxid $x farmakologie $7 D005027
650    _2
$a formaldehyd $x farmakologie $7 D005557
650    12
$a záření gama $7 D005720
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a protézy kloubů $x škodlivé účinky $x klasifikace $7 D007595
650    _2
$a testování materiálů $x metody $7 D008422
650    _2
$a polyethylen $x terapeutické užití $7 D020959
650    _2
$a selhání protézy $7 D011475
650    _2
$a spektrofotometrie infračervená $x metody $7 D013055
650    _2
$a sterilizace $x metody $7 D013242
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a anglický abstrakt $7 D004740
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Pokorný, David, $d 1968- $7 jn20001103568 $u I. ortopedická klinika 1. LF UK a FN Motol, Praha
700    1_
$a Šlouf, Miroslav, $d 1973- $7 xx0107048 $u Ústav makromolekulami chemie AV ČR, Praha
700    1_
$a Vacková, Taťana $7 _AN076109 $u Ústav makromolekulami chemie AV ČR, Praha
700    1_
$a Dybal, Jiří $7 xx0312810 $u Ústav makromolekulami chemie AV ČR, Praha
700    1_
$a Sosna, Antonín, $d 1943- $7 jn20000710566 $u I. ortopedická klinika 1. LF UK a FN Motol, Praha
773    0_
$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 81, č. 1 (2014), s. 33-39
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y 4 $z 0
990    __
$a 20151001 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240117103541 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1094194 $s 914057
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 81 $c 1 $d 33-39 $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
GRA    __
$a NT12229 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20151001

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...