• Something wrong with this record ?

Can rove beetles (Staphylinidae) be excluded in studies focusing on saproxylic beetles in central European beech forests

G. Parmain, C. Bouget, J. Müller, J. Horak, MM. Gossner, T. Lachat, G. Isacsson,

. 2015 ; 105 (1) : 101-9. [pub] 20141201

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 2001-02-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2001-02-01 to 1 year ago

Monitoring saproxylic beetle diversity, though challenging, can help identifying relevant conservation sites or key drivers of forest biodiversity, and assessing the impact of forestry practices on biodiversity. Unfortunately, monitoring species assemblages is costly, mainly due to the time spent on identification. Excluding families which are rich in specimens and species but are difficult to identify is a frequent procedure used in ecological entomology to reduce the identification cost. The Staphylinidae (rove beetle) family is both one of the most frequently excluded and one of the most species-rich saproxylic beetle families. Using a large-scale beetle and environmental dataset from 238 beech stands across Europe, we evaluated the effects of staphylinid exclusion on results in ecological forest studies. Simplified staphylinid-excluded assemblages were found to be relevant surrogates for whole assemblages. The species richness and composition of saproxylic beetle assemblages both with and without staphylinids responded congruently to landscape, climatic and stand gradients, even when the assemblages included a high proportion of staphylinid species. At both local and regional scales, the species richness as well as the species composition of staphylinid-included and staphylinid-excluded assemblages were highly positively correlated. Ranking of sites according to their biodiversity level, which either included or excluded Staphylinidae in species richness, also gave congruent results. From our results, species assemblages omitting staphylinids can be taken as efficient surrogates for complete assemblages in large scale biodiversity monitoring studies.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15031690
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20151008121209.0
007      
ta
008      
151005s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1017/S0007485314000741 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25434278
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Parmain, G $u National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture. (IRSTEA),'Forest ecosystems' Research Unit, Domaine des Barres, F-45290 Nogent-sur-Vernisson,France.
245    10
$a Can rove beetles (Staphylinidae) be excluded in studies focusing on saproxylic beetles in central European beech forests / $c G. Parmain, C. Bouget, J. Müller, J. Horak, MM. Gossner, T. Lachat, G. Isacsson,
520    9_
$a Monitoring saproxylic beetle diversity, though challenging, can help identifying relevant conservation sites or key drivers of forest biodiversity, and assessing the impact of forestry practices on biodiversity. Unfortunately, monitoring species assemblages is costly, mainly due to the time spent on identification. Excluding families which are rich in specimens and species but are difficult to identify is a frequent procedure used in ecological entomology to reduce the identification cost. The Staphylinidae (rove beetle) family is both one of the most frequently excluded and one of the most species-rich saproxylic beetle families. Using a large-scale beetle and environmental dataset from 238 beech stands across Europe, we evaluated the effects of staphylinid exclusion on results in ecological forest studies. Simplified staphylinid-excluded assemblages were found to be relevant surrogates for whole assemblages. The species richness and composition of saproxylic beetle assemblages both with and without staphylinids responded congruently to landscape, climatic and stand gradients, even when the assemblages included a high proportion of staphylinid species. At both local and regional scales, the species richness as well as the species composition of staphylinid-included and staphylinid-excluded assemblages were highly positively correlated. Ranking of sites according to their biodiversity level, which either included or excluded Staphylinidae in species richness, also gave congruent results. From our results, species assemblages omitting staphylinids can be taken as efficient surrogates for complete assemblages in large scale biodiversity monitoring studies.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a brouci $x fyziologie $7 D001517
650    12
$a biodiverzita $7 D044822
650    _2
$a zachování přírodních zdrojů $x metody $7 D003247
650    _2
$a dieta $7 D004032
650    _2
$a životní prostředí $7 D004777
650    _2
$a buk (rod) $x fyziologie $7 D029964
650    _2
$a potravní řetězec $7 D020387
650    _2
$a lesnictví $7 D016468
650    12
$a lesy $7 D065928
651    _2
$a Evropa $7 D005060
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Bouget, C $u National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture. (IRSTEA),'Forest ecosystems' Research Unit, Domaine des Barres, F-45290 Nogent-sur-Vernisson,France.
700    1_
$a Müller, J $u Nationalparkverwaltung Bayerischer Wald Stellvertretender Leiter Sachgebietsleiter Naturschutz und ForschungFreyunger Str. 2, 94481 Grafenau,Germany.
700    1_
$a Horak, J $u Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences,Czech University of Life Sciences Prague,Kamycka 1176, CZ-165 21 Prague,Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Gossner, M M $u Terrestrial Ecology Research Group, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Center for Food and Life Sciences Weihenstephan,Technische Universität München,Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, 85354 Freising-Weihenstephan,Germany.
700    1_
$a Lachat, T $u Swiss Federal Institute for Forest,Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf,Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Isacsson, G $u Swedish Forest Agency,P.O. Box 63, SE-281 21 Hässleholm,Sweden.
773    0_
$w MED00180191 $t Bulletin of entomological research $x 1475-2670 $g Roč. 105, č. 1 (2015), s. 101-9
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25434278 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20151005 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20151008121355 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1092566 $s 914816
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 105 $c 1 $d 101-9 $e 20141201 $i 1475-2670 $m Bulletin of entomological research $n Bull Entomol Res $x MED00180191
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20151005

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...