-
Something wrong with this record ?
Can rove beetles (Staphylinidae) be excluded in studies focusing on saproxylic beetles in central European beech forests
G. Parmain, C. Bouget, J. Müller, J. Horak, MM. Gossner, T. Lachat, G. Isacsson,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 2001-02-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2001-02-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Biodiversity * MeSH
- Coleoptera physiology MeSH
- Fagus physiology MeSH
- Diet MeSH
- Forestry MeSH
- Forests * MeSH
- Food Chain MeSH
- Conservation of Natural Resources methods MeSH
- Environment MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
Monitoring saproxylic beetle diversity, though challenging, can help identifying relevant conservation sites or key drivers of forest biodiversity, and assessing the impact of forestry practices on biodiversity. Unfortunately, monitoring species assemblages is costly, mainly due to the time spent on identification. Excluding families which are rich in specimens and species but are difficult to identify is a frequent procedure used in ecological entomology to reduce the identification cost. The Staphylinidae (rove beetle) family is both one of the most frequently excluded and one of the most species-rich saproxylic beetle families. Using a large-scale beetle and environmental dataset from 238 beech stands across Europe, we evaluated the effects of staphylinid exclusion on results in ecological forest studies. Simplified staphylinid-excluded assemblages were found to be relevant surrogates for whole assemblages. The species richness and composition of saproxylic beetle assemblages both with and without staphylinids responded congruently to landscape, climatic and stand gradients, even when the assemblages included a high proportion of staphylinid species. At both local and regional scales, the species richness as well as the species composition of staphylinid-included and staphylinid-excluded assemblages were highly positively correlated. Ranking of sites according to their biodiversity level, which either included or excluded Staphylinidae in species richness, also gave congruent results. From our results, species assemblages omitting staphylinids can be taken as efficient surrogates for complete assemblages in large scale biodiversity monitoring studies.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15031690
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20151008121209.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 151005s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1017/S0007485314000741 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)25434278
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Parmain, G $u National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture. (IRSTEA),'Forest ecosystems' Research Unit, Domaine des Barres, F-45290 Nogent-sur-Vernisson,France.
- 245 10
- $a Can rove beetles (Staphylinidae) be excluded in studies focusing on saproxylic beetles in central European beech forests / $c G. Parmain, C. Bouget, J. Müller, J. Horak, MM. Gossner, T. Lachat, G. Isacsson,
- 520 9_
- $a Monitoring saproxylic beetle diversity, though challenging, can help identifying relevant conservation sites or key drivers of forest biodiversity, and assessing the impact of forestry practices on biodiversity. Unfortunately, monitoring species assemblages is costly, mainly due to the time spent on identification. Excluding families which are rich in specimens and species but are difficult to identify is a frequent procedure used in ecological entomology to reduce the identification cost. The Staphylinidae (rove beetle) family is both one of the most frequently excluded and one of the most species-rich saproxylic beetle families. Using a large-scale beetle and environmental dataset from 238 beech stands across Europe, we evaluated the effects of staphylinid exclusion on results in ecological forest studies. Simplified staphylinid-excluded assemblages were found to be relevant surrogates for whole assemblages. The species richness and composition of saproxylic beetle assemblages both with and without staphylinids responded congruently to landscape, climatic and stand gradients, even when the assemblages included a high proportion of staphylinid species. At both local and regional scales, the species richness as well as the species composition of staphylinid-included and staphylinid-excluded assemblages were highly positively correlated. Ranking of sites according to their biodiversity level, which either included or excluded Staphylinidae in species richness, also gave congruent results. From our results, species assemblages omitting staphylinids can be taken as efficient surrogates for complete assemblages in large scale biodiversity monitoring studies.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a brouci $x fyziologie $7 D001517
- 650 12
- $a biodiverzita $7 D044822
- 650 _2
- $a zachování přírodních zdrojů $x metody $7 D003247
- 650 _2
- $a dieta $7 D004032
- 650 _2
- $a životní prostředí $7 D004777
- 650 _2
- $a buk (rod) $x fyziologie $7 D029964
- 650 _2
- $a potravní řetězec $7 D020387
- 650 _2
- $a lesnictví $7 D016468
- 650 12
- $a lesy $7 D065928
- 651 _2
- $a Evropa $7 D005060
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Bouget, C $u National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture. (IRSTEA),'Forest ecosystems' Research Unit, Domaine des Barres, F-45290 Nogent-sur-Vernisson,France.
- 700 1_
- $a Müller, J $u Nationalparkverwaltung Bayerischer Wald Stellvertretender Leiter Sachgebietsleiter Naturschutz und ForschungFreyunger Str. 2, 94481 Grafenau,Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Horak, J $u Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences,Czech University of Life Sciences Prague,Kamycka 1176, CZ-165 21 Prague,Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Gossner, M M $u Terrestrial Ecology Research Group, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Center for Food and Life Sciences Weihenstephan,Technische Universität München,Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, 85354 Freising-Weihenstephan,Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Lachat, T $u Swiss Federal Institute for Forest,Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf,Switzerland.
- 700 1_
- $a Isacsson, G $u Swedish Forest Agency,P.O. Box 63, SE-281 21 Hässleholm,Sweden.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180191 $t Bulletin of entomological research $x 1475-2670 $g Roč. 105, č. 1 (2015), s. 101-9
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25434278 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20151005 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20151008121355 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1092566 $s 914816
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 105 $c 1 $d 101-9 $e 20141201 $i 1475-2670 $m Bulletin of entomological research $n Bull Entomol Res $x MED00180191
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20151005