• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Communication in a Human biomonitoring study: Focus group work, public engagement and lessons learnt in 17 European countries

K. Exley, N. Cano, D. Aerts, P. Biot, L. Casteleyn, M. Kolossa-Gehring, G. Schwedler, A. Castaño, J. Angerer, HM. Koch, M. Esteban, G. Schoeters, E. Den Hond, M. Horvat, L. Bloemen, LE. Knudsen, R. Joas, A. Joas, MC. Dewolf, E. Van de Mieroop, A....

. 2015 ; 141 (-) : 31-41. [pub] 20141212

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc16000453

A communication strategy was developed by The Consortium to Perform Human Biomonitoring on a European Scale (COPHES), as part of its objectives to develop a framework and protocols to enable the collection of comparable human biomonitoring data throughout Europe. The framework and protocols were tested in the pilot study DEMOCOPHES (Demonstration of a study to Coordinate and Perform Human biomonitoring on a European Scale). The aims of the communication strategy were to raise awareness of human biomonitoring, encourage participation in the study and to communicate the study results and their public health significance. It identified the audiences and key messages, documented the procedure for dissemination of results and was updated as the project progressed. A communication plan listed the tools and materials such as press releases, flyers, recruitment letters and information leaflets required for each audience with a time frame for releasing them. Public insight research was used to evaluate the recruitment material, and the feedback was used to improve the documents. Dissemination of results was coordinated in a step by step approach by the participating countries within DEMOCOPHES, taking into account specific national messages according to the needs of each country. Participants received individual results, unless they refused to be informed, along with guidance on what the results meant. The aggregate results and policy recommendations were then communicated to the general public and stakeholders, followed by dissemination at European level. Several lessons were learnt that may assist other future human biomonitoring studies. Recruitment took longer than anticipated and so social scientists, to help with community engagement, should be part of the research team from the start. As a European study, involving multiple countries, additional considerations were needed for the numerous organisations, different languages, cultures, policies and priorities. Therefore, communication documents should be seen as templates with essential information clearly indicated and the option for each country to tailor the material to reflect these differences. Future studies should consider setting up multidisciplinary networks of medical professionals and communication experts, and holding training workshops to discuss the interpretation of results and risk communication. Publicity and wide dissemination of the results helped to raise awareness of human biomonitoring to the general public, policy makers and other key stakeholders. Effective and timely communication, at all stages of a study, is essential if the potential of human biomonitoring research to improve public health is to be realised.

BiPRO GmbH Munich Germany

Centre de Recherche Public Gabriel Lippmann Belvaux Luxembourg

Environmental Health Center Cluj Romania

Environmental Health Science International Hulst The Netherlands

Environmental Toxicology Centro Nacional de Sanidad Ambiental Instituto de Salud Carlos 3 Majadahonda Madrid Spain

Federal Environment Agency Berlin Germany

Federal Public Service Health Food Chain Safety and Environment Brussels Belgium

Flemish Institute for Technological Research Environmental Risk and Health Unit Belgium

Hainaut Vigilance Sanitaire and Hygiene Publique in Hainaut Mons Belgium

Health Service Executive Dublin Ireland

Independent TV Director and Communications Consultant Barcelona Spain

Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance Institute of the Ruhr Universitat Bochum Bochum Germany

Institute of Preventive Medicine Lisbon Faculty of Medicine Portugal

Jožef Stefan Institute Ljubljana Slovenia

Karolinska Institute Stockholm Sweden

Laboratoire National de Santé Dudelange Luxembourg

Larnaca General Hospital Ministry of Health Republic of Cyprus

National Institute of Environmental Health Budapest Hungary

National Institute of Public Health Prague Czech Republic

Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine Łódź Poland

Provincial Institute for Hygiene Kronenburgstraat 45 2000 Antwerp Belgium

Public Health Authority of the Slovak Republic Bratislava Slovakia

Public Health England Centre for Radiation Chemical and Environmental Hazards Chilton Didcot South Oxfordshire OX10 8BW United Kingdom

State General Laboratory Ministry of Health Republic of Cyprus

University of Antwerp Belgium

University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

University of Leuven Leuven Belgium

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16000453
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180731093756.0
007      
ta
008      
160108s2015 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.envres.2014.12.003 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25499539
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Exley, Karen $u Public Health England, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, South Oxfordshire OX10 8BW, United Kingdom. Electronic address: karen.exley@phe.gov.uk.
245    10
$a Communication in a Human biomonitoring study: Focus group work, public engagement and lessons learnt in 17 European countries / $c K. Exley, N. Cano, D. Aerts, P. Biot, L. Casteleyn, M. Kolossa-Gehring, G. Schwedler, A. Castaño, J. Angerer, HM. Koch, M. Esteban, G. Schoeters, E. Den Hond, M. Horvat, L. Bloemen, LE. Knudsen, R. Joas, A. Joas, MC. Dewolf, E. Van de Mieroop, A. Katsonouri, A. Hadjipanayis, M. Cerna, A. Krskova, K. Becker, U. Fiddicke, M. Seiwert, TA. Mørck, P. Rudnai, S. Kozepesy, E. Cullen, A. Kellegher, AC. Gutleb, ME. Fischer, D. Ligocka, J. Kamińska, S. Namorado, MF. Reis, IR. Lupsa, AE. Gurzau, K. Halzlova, M. Jajcaj, D. Mazej, JS. Tratnik, O. Huetos, A. López, M. Berglund, K. Larsson, O. Sepai,
520    9_
$a A communication strategy was developed by The Consortium to Perform Human Biomonitoring on a European Scale (COPHES), as part of its objectives to develop a framework and protocols to enable the collection of comparable human biomonitoring data throughout Europe. The framework and protocols were tested in the pilot study DEMOCOPHES (Demonstration of a study to Coordinate and Perform Human biomonitoring on a European Scale). The aims of the communication strategy were to raise awareness of human biomonitoring, encourage participation in the study and to communicate the study results and their public health significance. It identified the audiences and key messages, documented the procedure for dissemination of results and was updated as the project progressed. A communication plan listed the tools and materials such as press releases, flyers, recruitment letters and information leaflets required for each audience with a time frame for releasing them. Public insight research was used to evaluate the recruitment material, and the feedback was used to improve the documents. Dissemination of results was coordinated in a step by step approach by the participating countries within DEMOCOPHES, taking into account specific national messages according to the needs of each country. Participants received individual results, unless they refused to be informed, along with guidance on what the results meant. The aggregate results and policy recommendations were then communicated to the general public and stakeholders, followed by dissemination at European level. Several lessons were learnt that may assist other future human biomonitoring studies. Recruitment took longer than anticipated and so social scientists, to help with community engagement, should be part of the research team from the start. As a European study, involving multiple countries, additional considerations were needed for the numerous organisations, different languages, cultures, policies and priorities. Therefore, communication documents should be seen as templates with essential information clearly indicated and the option for each country to tailor the material to reflect these differences. Future studies should consider setting up multidisciplinary networks of medical professionals and communication experts, and holding training workshops to discuss the interpretation of results and risk communication. Publicity and wide dissemination of the results helped to raise awareness of human biomonitoring to the general public, policy makers and other key stakeholders. Effective and timely communication, at all stages of a study, is essential if the potential of human biomonitoring research to improve public health is to be realised.
650    12
$a komunikace $7 D003142
650    12
$a účast komunity $7 D003256
650    _2
$a monitorování životního prostředí $x metody $7 D004784
650    12
$a zjišťování skupinových postojů $7 D017144
650    _2
$a zdravotní politika $7 D006291
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a šíření informací $7 D033181
650    12
$a mezinárodní spolupráce $7 D007391
650    12
$a rozvoj plánování $7 D016730
650    _2
$a veřejná politika $7 D011640
650    _2
$a výzkumný projekt $7 D012107
650    _2
$a vzorkové studie $7 D012494
651    _2
$a Evropa $7 D005060
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Cano, Noemi $u Independent TV Director and Communications Consultant, Barcelona, Spain.
700    1_
$a Aerts, Dominique $u Federal Public Service Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment, Brussels, Belgium. $7 gn_A_00001957
700    1_
$a Biot, Pierre $u Federal Public Service Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment, Brussels, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Casteleyn, Ludwine $u University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Kolossa-Gehring, Marike $u Federal Environment Agency (UBA), Berlin, Germany.
700    1_
$a Schwedler, Gerda $u Federal Environment Agency (UBA), Berlin, Germany.
700    1_
$a Castaño, Argelia $u Environmental Toxicology, Centro Nacional de Sanidad Ambiental, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
700    1_
$a Angerer, Jürgen, $d 1942- $7 mub2015862304 $u Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance-Institute of the Ruhr-Universitat Bochum (IPA), Bochum, Germany.
700    1_
$a Koch, Holger M $u Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance-Institute of the Ruhr-Universitat Bochum (IPA), Bochum, Germany.
700    1_
$a Esteban, Marta $u Environmental Toxicology, Centro Nacional de Sanidad Ambiental, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
700    1_
$a Schoeters, Greet $u Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Environmental Risk and Health Unit, Belgium; University of Antwerp, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Den Hond, Elly $u Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Environmental Risk and Health Unit, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Horvat, Milena $u Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
700    1_
$a Bloemen, Louis $u Environmental Health Science International, Hulst, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Knudsen, Lisbeth E $u University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Joas, Reinhard $u BiPRO GmbH, Munich, Germany.
700    1_
$a Joas, Anke $u BiPRO GmbH, Munich, Germany.
700    1_
$a Dewolf, Marie-Christine $u Hainaut Vigilance Sanitaire and Hygiene Publique in Hainaut, Mons, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Van de Mieroop, Els $u Provincial Institute for Hygiene, Kronenburgstraat 45, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Katsonouri, Andromachi $u State General Laboratory (SGL), Ministry of Health, Republic of Cyprus.
700    1_
$a Hadjipanayis, Adamos $u Larnaca General Hospital, Ministry of Health, Republic of Cyprus.
700    1_
$a Cerna, Milena $u National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Krskova, Andrea $u National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Becker, Kerstin $u Federal Environment Agency (UBA), Berlin, Germany.
700    1_
$a Fiddicke, Ulrike $u Federal Environment Agency (UBA), Berlin, Germany.
700    1_
$a Seiwert, Margarete $u Federal Environment Agency (UBA), Berlin, Germany.
700    1_
$a Mørck, Thit A $u University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Rudnai, Peter $u National Institute of Environmental Health, Budapest, Hungary.
700    1_
$a Kozepesy, Szilvia $u National Institute of Environmental Health, Budapest, Hungary.
700    1_
$a Cullen, Elizabeth $u Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland.
700    1_
$a Kellegher, Anne $u Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland.
700    1_
$a Gutleb, Arno C $u Centre de Recherche Public Gabriel Lippmann, Belvaux, Luxembourg.
700    1_
$a Fischer, Marc E $u Laboratoire National de Santé, Dudelange, Luxembourg.
700    1_
$a Ligocka, Danuta $u Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łódź, Poland.
700    1_
$a Kamińska, Joanna $u Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łódź, Poland.
700    1_
$a Namorado, Sónia $u Institute of Preventive Medicine, Lisbon Faculty of Medicine, Portugal.
700    1_
$a Reis, M Fátima $u Institute of Preventive Medicine, Lisbon Faculty of Medicine, Portugal.
700    1_
$a Lupsa, Ioana-Rodica $u Environmental Health Center, Cluj, Romania.
700    1_
$a Gurzau, Anca E $u Environmental Health Center, Cluj, Romania.
700    1_
$a Halzlova, Katarina $u Public Health Authority of the Slovak Republic, Bratislava, Slovakia.
700    1_
$a Jajcaj, Michal $u Public Health Authority of the Slovak Republic, Bratislava, Slovakia.
700    1_
$a Mazej, Darja $u Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
700    1_
$a Tratnik, Janja Snoj $u Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
700    1_
$a Huetos, Olga $u Environmental Toxicology, Centro Nacional de Sanidad Ambiental, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
700    1_
$a López, Ana $u Environmental Toxicology, Centro Nacional de Sanidad Ambiental, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
700    1_
$a Berglund, Marika $u Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
700    1_
$a Larsson, Kristin $u Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
700    1_
$a Sepai, Ovnair $u Public Health England, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, South Oxfordshire OX10 8BW, United Kingdom.
773    0_
$w MED00001557 $t Environmental research $x 1096-0953 $g Roč. 141, č. - (2015), s. 31-41
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25499539 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160108 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180731094108 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1102734 $s 924659
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 141 $c - $d 31-41 $e 20141212 $i 1096-0953 $m Environmental research. Section A $n Environ Res $x MED00001557
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160108

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...