-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Clinical and cost effectiveness of hexaminolevulinate-guided blue-light cystoscopy: evidence review and updated expert recommendations
JA. Witjes, M. Babjuk, P. Gontero, D. Jacqmin, A. Karl, S. Kruck, P. Mariappan, J. Palou Redorta, A. Stenzl, R. van Velthoven, D. Zaak,
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, směrnice pro lékařskou praxi, práce podpořená grantem, přehledy
- MeSH
- analýza nákladů a výnosů MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- cystektomie ekonomika metody normy MeSH
- cystoskopie ekonomika metody normy MeSH
- ekonomické modely MeSH
- invazivní růst nádoru MeSH
- kvalita života MeSH
- kvalitativně upravené roky života MeSH
- kyselina aminolevulová analogy a deriváty ekonomika MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lokální recidiva nádoru MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře ekonomika patologie chirurgie MeSH
- náklady na zdravotní péči * MeSH
- prediktivní hodnota testů MeSH
- přežití bez známek nemoci MeSH
- progrese nemoci MeSH
- reziduální nádor MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi MeSH
CONTEXT: Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is associated with a high recurrence risk, partly because of the persistence of lesions following transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) due to the presence of multiple lesions and the difficulty in identifying the exact extent and location of tumours using standard white-light cystoscopy (WLC). Hexaminolevulinate (HAL) is an optical-imaging agent used with blue-light cystoscopy (BLC) in NMIBC diagnosis. Increasing evidence from long-term follow-up confirms the benefits of BLC over WLC in terms of increased detection and reduced recurrence rates. OBJECTIVE: To provide updated expert guidance on the optimal use of HAL-guided cystoscopy in clinical practice to improve management of patients with NMIBC, based on a review of the most recent data on clinical and cost effectiveness and expert input. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed and conference searches, supplemented by personal experience. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Based on published data, it is recommended that BLC be used for all patients at initial TURBT to increase lesion detection and improve resection quality, thereby reducing recurrence and improving outcomes for patients. BLC is particularly useful in patients with abnormal urine cytology but no evidence of lesions on WLC, as it can detect carcinoma in situ that is difficult to visualise on WLC. In addition, personal experience of the authors indicates that HAL-guided BLC can be used as part of routine inpatient cystoscopic assessment following initial TURBT to confirm the efficacy of treatment and to identify any previously missed or recurrent tumours. Health economic modelling indicates that the use of HAL to assist primary TURBT is no more expensive than WLC alone and will result in improved quality-adjusted life-years and reduced costs over time. CONCLUSIONS: HAL-guided BLC is a clinically effective and cost-effective tool for improving NMIBC detection and management, thereby reducing the burden of disease for patients and the health care system. PATIENT SUMMARY: Blue-light cystoscopy (BLC) helps the urologist identify bladder tumours that may be difficult to see using standard white-light cystoscopy (WLC). As a result, the amount of tumour that is surgically removed is increased, and the risk of tumour recurrence is reduced. Although use of BLC means that the initial operation costs more than it would if only WLC were used, over time the total costs of managing bladder cancer are reduced because patients do not need as many additional operations for recurrent tumours.
Department of Urology Eberhard Karls University Tübingen Germany
Department of Urology Jules Bordet Institute Brussels Belgium
Department of Urology Ludwig Maximilians University Munich Germany
Department of Urology Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre Nijmegen The Netherlands
Department of Urology San Giovanni Battista Hospital University of Turin Turin Italy
Department of Urology Strasbourg University Hospital Strasbourg France
Department of Urology Traunstein Hospital Traunstein Germany
Department of Urology Western General Hospital Edinburgh UK
Urologic Oncology Unit Department of Urology Puigvert Foundation Barcelona Spain
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16000704
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160125110834.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160108s2014 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.037 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)25001887
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Witjes, J Alfred $u Department of Urology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: fred.witjes@radboudumc.nl.
- 245 10
- $a Clinical and cost effectiveness of hexaminolevulinate-guided blue-light cystoscopy: evidence review and updated expert recommendations / $c JA. Witjes, M. Babjuk, P. Gontero, D. Jacqmin, A. Karl, S. Kruck, P. Mariappan, J. Palou Redorta, A. Stenzl, R. van Velthoven, D. Zaak,
- 520 9_
- $a CONTEXT: Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is associated with a high recurrence risk, partly because of the persistence of lesions following transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) due to the presence of multiple lesions and the difficulty in identifying the exact extent and location of tumours using standard white-light cystoscopy (WLC). Hexaminolevulinate (HAL) is an optical-imaging agent used with blue-light cystoscopy (BLC) in NMIBC diagnosis. Increasing evidence from long-term follow-up confirms the benefits of BLC over WLC in terms of increased detection and reduced recurrence rates. OBJECTIVE: To provide updated expert guidance on the optimal use of HAL-guided cystoscopy in clinical practice to improve management of patients with NMIBC, based on a review of the most recent data on clinical and cost effectiveness and expert input. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed and conference searches, supplemented by personal experience. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Based on published data, it is recommended that BLC be used for all patients at initial TURBT to increase lesion detection and improve resection quality, thereby reducing recurrence and improving outcomes for patients. BLC is particularly useful in patients with abnormal urine cytology but no evidence of lesions on WLC, as it can detect carcinoma in situ that is difficult to visualise on WLC. In addition, personal experience of the authors indicates that HAL-guided BLC can be used as part of routine inpatient cystoscopic assessment following initial TURBT to confirm the efficacy of treatment and to identify any previously missed or recurrent tumours. Health economic modelling indicates that the use of HAL to assist primary TURBT is no more expensive than WLC alone and will result in improved quality-adjusted life-years and reduced costs over time. CONCLUSIONS: HAL-guided BLC is a clinically effective and cost-effective tool for improving NMIBC detection and management, thereby reducing the burden of disease for patients and the health care system. PATIENT SUMMARY: Blue-light cystoscopy (BLC) helps the urologist identify bladder tumours that may be difficult to see using standard white-light cystoscopy (WLC). As a result, the amount of tumour that is surgically removed is increased, and the risk of tumour recurrence is reduced. Although use of BLC means that the initial operation costs more than it would if only WLC were used, over time the total costs of managing bladder cancer are reduced because patients do not need as many additional operations for recurrent tumours.
- 650 _2
- $a kyselina aminolevulová $x analogy a deriváty $x ekonomika $7 D000622
- 650 _2
- $a analýza nákladů a výnosů $7 D003362
- 650 _2
- $a cystektomie $x ekonomika $x metody $x normy $7 D015653
- 650 _2
- $a cystoskopie $x ekonomika $x metody $x normy $7 D003558
- 650 _2
- $a progrese nemoci $7 D018450
- 650 _2
- $a přežití bez známek nemoci $7 D018572
- 650 12
- $a náklady na zdravotní péči $7 D017048
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a ekonomické modely $7 D018803
- 650 _2
- $a invazivní růst nádoru $7 D009361
- 650 _2
- $a lokální recidiva nádoru $7 D009364
- 650 _2
- $a reziduální nádor $7 D018365
- 650 _2
- $a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
- 650 _2
- $a kvalita života $7 D011788
- 650 _2
- $a kvalitativně upravené roky života $7 D019057
- 650 _2
- $a časové faktory $7 D013997
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a nádory močového měchýře $x ekonomika $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D001749
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a směrnice pro lékařskou praxi $7 D017065
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Babjuk, Marek $u Department of Urology, Motol Hospital, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Gontero, Paolo $u Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
- 700 1_
- $a Jacqmin, Didier $u Department of Urology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
- 700 1_
- $a Karl, Alexander $u Department of Urology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Kruck, Stephan $u Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Mariappan, Paramananthan $u Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Palou Redorta, Juan $u Urologic Oncology Unit, Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.
- 700 1_
- $a Stenzl, Arnulf $u Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a van Velthoven, Roland $u Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium.
- 700 1_
- $a Zaak, Dirk $u Department of Urology, Traunstein Hospital, Traunstein, Germany.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001669 $t European urology $x 1873-7560 $g Roč. 66, č. 5 (2014), s. 863-71
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25001887 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160108 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160125110956 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1102985 $s 924910
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 66 $c 5 $d 863-71 $e 20140704 $i 1873-7560 $m European urology $n Eur Urol $x MED00001669
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20160108