Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Semi-automated segmentation of pre-operative low grade gliomas in magnetic resonance imaging

Z. Akkus, J. Sedlar, L. Coufalova, P. Korfiatis, TL. Kline, JD. Warner, J. Agrawal, BJ. Erickson,

. 2015 ; 15 (-) : 12. [pub] 20150814

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

BACKGROUND: Segmentation of pre-operative low-grade gliomas (LGGs) from magnetic resonance imaging is a crucial step for studying imaging biomarkers. However, segmentation of LGGs is particularly challenging because they rarely enhance after gadolinium administration. Like other gliomas, they have irregular tumor shape, heterogeneous composition, ill-defined tumor boundaries, and limited number of image types. To overcome these challenges we propose a semi-automated segmentation method that relies only on T2-weighted (T2W) and optionally post-contrast T1-weighted (T1W) images. METHODS: First, the user draws a region-of-interest (ROI) that completely encloses the tumor and some normal tissue. Second, a normal brain atlas and post-contrast T1W images are registered to T2W images. Third, the posterior probability of each pixel/voxel belonging to normal and abnormal tissues is calculated based on information derived from the atlas and ROI. Finally, geodesic active contours use the probability map of the tumor to shrink the ROI until optimal tumor boundaries are found. This method was validated against the true segmentation (TS) of 30 LGG patients for both 2D (1 slice) and 3D. The TS was obtained from manual segmentations of three experts using the Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE) software. Dice and Jaccard indices and other descriptive statistics were computed for the proposed method, as well as the experts' segmentation versus the TS. We also tested the method with the BraTS datasets, which supply expert segmentations. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: For 2D segmentation vs. TS, the mean Dice index was 0.90 ± 0.06 (standard deviation), sensitivity was 0.92, and specificity was 0.99. For 3D segmentation vs. TS, the mean Dice index was 0.89 ± 0.06, sensitivity was 0.91, and specificity was 0.99. The automated results are comparable with the experts' manual segmentation results. CONCLUSIONS: We present an accurate, robust, efficient, and reproducible segmentation method for pre-operative LGGs.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16010005
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160412123621.0
007      
ta
008      
160408s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s40644-015-0047-z $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s40644-015-0047-z $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26268363
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Akkus, Zeynettin $u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. akkus.zeynettin@mayo.edu. $7 gn_A_00003005
245    10
$a Semi-automated segmentation of pre-operative low grade gliomas in magnetic resonance imaging / $c Z. Akkus, J. Sedlar, L. Coufalova, P. Korfiatis, TL. Kline, JD. Warner, J. Agrawal, BJ. Erickson,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Segmentation of pre-operative low-grade gliomas (LGGs) from magnetic resonance imaging is a crucial step for studying imaging biomarkers. However, segmentation of LGGs is particularly challenging because they rarely enhance after gadolinium administration. Like other gliomas, they have irregular tumor shape, heterogeneous composition, ill-defined tumor boundaries, and limited number of image types. To overcome these challenges we propose a semi-automated segmentation method that relies only on T2-weighted (T2W) and optionally post-contrast T1-weighted (T1W) images. METHODS: First, the user draws a region-of-interest (ROI) that completely encloses the tumor and some normal tissue. Second, a normal brain atlas and post-contrast T1W images are registered to T2W images. Third, the posterior probability of each pixel/voxel belonging to normal and abnormal tissues is calculated based on information derived from the atlas and ROI. Finally, geodesic active contours use the probability map of the tumor to shrink the ROI until optimal tumor boundaries are found. This method was validated against the true segmentation (TS) of 30 LGG patients for both 2D (1 slice) and 3D. The TS was obtained from manual segmentations of three experts using the Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE) software. Dice and Jaccard indices and other descriptive statistics were computed for the proposed method, as well as the experts' segmentation versus the TS. We also tested the method with the BraTS datasets, which supply expert segmentations. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: For 2D segmentation vs. TS, the mean Dice index was 0.90 ± 0.06 (standard deviation), sensitivity was 0.92, and specificity was 0.99. For 3D segmentation vs. TS, the mean Dice index was 0.89 ± 0.06, sensitivity was 0.91, and specificity was 0.99. The automated results are comparable with the experts' manual segmentation results. CONCLUSIONS: We present an accurate, robust, efficient, and reproducible segmentation method for pre-operative LGGs.
650    _2
$a algoritmy $7 D000465
650    _2
$a nádory mozku $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D001932
650    _2
$a gliom $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D005910
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a počítačové zpracování obrazu $7 D007091
650    12
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x metody $7 D008279
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural $7 D052061
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Sedlar, Jiri $u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Sedlar.Jiri@mayo.edu.
700    1_
$a Coufalova, Lucie $u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Coufalova.Lucie@mayo.edu. International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic. Coufalova.Lucie@mayo.edu. Neurosurgical Department of 1st Faculty of Medicine of Charles University, Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. Coufalova.Lucie@mayo.edu.
700    1_
$a Korfiatis, Panagiotis $u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Korfiatis.Panagiotis@mayo.edu.
700    1_
$a Kline, Timothy L $u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Kline.Timothy@mayo.edu.
700    1_
$a Warner, Joshua D $u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Warner.Joshua@mayo.edu.
700    1_
$a Agrawal, Jay $u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Agrawal.Jay@mayo.edu. $7 gn_A_00002261
700    1_
$a Erickson, Bradley J $u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. bje@mayo.edu.
773    0_
$w MED00173162 $t Cancer imaging the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society $x 1470-7330 $g Roč. 15, č. - (2015), s. 12
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26268363 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160408 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160412123704 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1113434 $s 934373
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 15 $c - $d 12 $e 20150814 $i 1470-7330 $m Cancer imaging $n Cancer Imaging $x MED00173162
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160408

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...