Detail
Článek
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Variation in honey bee gut microbial diversity affected by ontogenetic stage, age and geographic location

Z. Hroncova, J. Havlik, J. Killer, I. Doskocil, J. Tyl, M. Kamler, D. Titera, J. Hakl, J. Mrazek, V. Bunesova, V. Rada,

. 2015 ; 10 (3) : e0118707. [pub] 20150313

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc16010460

Social honey bees, Apis mellifera, host a set of distinct microbiota, which is similar across the continents and various honey bee species. Some of these bacteria, such as lactobacilli, have been linked to immunity and defence against pathogens. Pathogen defence is crucial, particularly in larval stages, as many pathogens affect the brood. However, information on larval microbiota is conflicting. Seven developmental stages and drones were sampled from 3 colonies at each of the 4 geographic locations of A. mellifera carnica, and the samples were maintained separately for analysis. We analysed the variation and abundance of important bacterial groups and taxa in the collected bees. Major bacterial groups were evaluated over the entire life of honey bee individuals, where digestive tracts of same aged bees were sampled in the course of time. The results showed that the microbial tract of 6-day-old 5th instar larvae were nearly equally rich in total microbial counts per total digestive tract weight as foraging bees, showing a high percentage of various lactobacilli (Firmicutes) and Gilliamella apicola (Gammaproteobacteria 1). However, during pupation, microbial counts were significantly reduced but recovered quickly by 6 days post-emergence. Between emergence and day 6, imago reached the highest counts of Firmicutes and Gammaproteobacteria, which then gradually declined with bee age. Redundancy analysis conducted using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis identified bacterial species that were characteristic of each developmental stage. The results suggest that 3-day 4th instar larvae contain low microbial counts that increase 2-fold by day 6 and then decrease during pupation. Microbial succession of the imago begins soon after emergence. We found that bacterial counts do not show only yearly cycles within a colony, but vary on the individual level. Sampling and pooling adult bees or 6th day larvae may lead to high errors and variability, as both of these stages may be undergoing dynamic succession.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16010460
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201203121330.0
007      
ta
008      
160408s2015 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0118707 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0118707 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25768309
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Hroncova, Zuzana $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Variation in honey bee gut microbial diversity affected by ontogenetic stage, age and geographic location / $c Z. Hroncova, J. Havlik, J. Killer, I. Doskocil, J. Tyl, M. Kamler, D. Titera, J. Hakl, J. Mrazek, V. Bunesova, V. Rada,
520    9_
$a Social honey bees, Apis mellifera, host a set of distinct microbiota, which is similar across the continents and various honey bee species. Some of these bacteria, such as lactobacilli, have been linked to immunity and defence against pathogens. Pathogen defence is crucial, particularly in larval stages, as many pathogens affect the brood. However, information on larval microbiota is conflicting. Seven developmental stages and drones were sampled from 3 colonies at each of the 4 geographic locations of A. mellifera carnica, and the samples were maintained separately for analysis. We analysed the variation and abundance of important bacterial groups and taxa in the collected bees. Major bacterial groups were evaluated over the entire life of honey bee individuals, where digestive tracts of same aged bees were sampled in the course of time. The results showed that the microbial tract of 6-day-old 5th instar larvae were nearly equally rich in total microbial counts per total digestive tract weight as foraging bees, showing a high percentage of various lactobacilli (Firmicutes) and Gilliamella apicola (Gammaproteobacteria 1). However, during pupation, microbial counts were significantly reduced but recovered quickly by 6 days post-emergence. Between emergence and day 6, imago reached the highest counts of Firmicutes and Gammaproteobacteria, which then gradually declined with bee age. Redundancy analysis conducted using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis identified bacterial species that were characteristic of each developmental stage. The results suggest that 3-day 4th instar larvae contain low microbial counts that increase 2-fold by day 6 and then decrease during pupation. Microbial succession of the imago begins soon after emergence. We found that bacterial counts do not show only yearly cycles within a colony, but vary on the individual level. Sampling and pooling adult bees or 6th day larvae may lead to high errors and variability, as both of these stages may be undergoing dynamic succession.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a Bacteria $x klasifikace $x genetika $x izolace a purifikace $7 D001419
650    _2
$a včely $x embryologie $x růst a vývoj $x mikrobiologie $7 D001516
650    _2
$a DNA bakterií $x genetika $7 D004269
650    _2
$a denaturační gradientová gelová elektroforéza $7 D058645
650    _2
$a ekosystém $7 D017753
650    12
$a střevní mikroflóra $7 D000069196
650    _2
$a gastrointestinální trakt $x mikrobiologie $7 D041981
650    _2
$a Lactobacillaceae $x genetika $7 D007777
650    _2
$a RNA ribozomální 16S $x genetika $7 D012336
650    _2
$a kvantitativní polymerázová řetězová reakce $7 D060888
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Havlik, Jaroslav $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Killer, Jiri $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic; Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Doskocil, Ivo $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Tyl, Jan $u Bee Research Institute at Dol, Libcice nad Vltavou, Czech Republic. $7 jo2016919268
700    1_
$a Kamler, Martin, $d 1979- $u Bee Research Institute at Dol, Libcice nad Vltavou, Czech Republic. $7 xx0123249
700    1_
$a Titěra, Dalibor, $d 1955- $u Bee Research Institute at Dol, Libcice nad Vltavou, Czech Republic; Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. $7 mzk2004235086
700    1_
$a Hakl, Josef $u Department of Forage Crops and Grassland Management, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Mrazek, Jakub $u Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Bunesova, Vera $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Rada, Vojtech $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 10, č. 3 (2015), s. e0118707
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25768309 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160408 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201203121327 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1113889 $s 934828
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 10 $c 3 $d e0118707 $e 20150313 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160408

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...