Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Now you see it, now you don't: flushing hosts prior to experimentation can predict their responses to brood parasitism

D. Hanley, P. Samaš, J. Heryán, ME. Hauber, T. Grim,

. 2015 ; 5 (-) : 9060. [pub] 20150312

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc16010464

Brood parasitic birds lay their eggs in other birds' nests, leaving hosts to raise their offspring. To understand parasite-host coevolutionary arms races, many studies have examined host responses to experimentally introduced eggs. However, attending parents often need to be flushed from their nests to add experimental eggs. If these birds witness parasitism events, they may recognize and reject foreign eggs more readily than parents who did not. We found that, after being flushed, female blackbirds, Turdus merula, remained close to their nests. Flushed females were more likely to eject foreign eggs and did so more quickly than females that were not flushed during experimentation. In contrast, flushing did not predict responses and latency to responses to parasitism by song thrush, Turdus philomelos, which flew farther from their nests and likely did not witness experimental parasitism. When statistically considering flushing, previously published conclusions regarding both species' response to experimental parasitism did not change. Nevertheless, we recommend that researchers record and statistically control for whether hosts were flushed prior to experimental parasitism. Our results have broad implications because more vigilant and/or bolder parents can gain more information about parasitism events and therefore have better chances of successfully defending against brood parasitism.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16010464
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160418110335.0
007      
ta
008      
160408s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1038/srep09060 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1038/srep09060 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25762433
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Hanley, Daniel $u Department of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology, Palacký University, 17. listopadu 50, Olomouc 77146, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Now you see it, now you don't: flushing hosts prior to experimentation can predict their responses to brood parasitism / $c D. Hanley, P. Samaš, J. Heryán, ME. Hauber, T. Grim,
520    9_
$a Brood parasitic birds lay their eggs in other birds' nests, leaving hosts to raise their offspring. To understand parasite-host coevolutionary arms races, many studies have examined host responses to experimentally introduced eggs. However, attending parents often need to be flushed from their nests to add experimental eggs. If these birds witness parasitism events, they may recognize and reject foreign eggs more readily than parents who did not. We found that, after being flushed, female blackbirds, Turdus merula, remained close to their nests. Flushed females were more likely to eject foreign eggs and did so more quickly than females that were not flushed during experimentation. In contrast, flushing did not predict responses and latency to responses to parasitism by song thrush, Turdus philomelos, which flew farther from their nests and likely did not witness experimental parasitism. When statistically considering flushing, previously published conclusions regarding both species' response to experimental parasitism did not change. Nevertheless, we recommend that researchers record and statistically control for whether hosts were flushed prior to experimental parasitism. Our results have broad implications because more vigilant and/or bolder parents can gain more information about parasitism events and therefore have better chances of successfully defending against brood parasitism.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a chování zvířat $7 D001522
650    _2
$a ptáci $x parazitologie $7 D001717
650    _2
$a vejce $7 D004531
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a interakce hostitele a parazita $7 D006790
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Samaš, Peter $u Department of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology, Palacký University, 17. listopadu 50, Olomouc 77146, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Heryán, Josef $u Department of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology, Palacký University, 17. listopadu 50, Olomouc 77146, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hauber, Mark E $u Department of Psychology, Hunter College and the Graduate Center, The City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10065, United States.
700    1_
$a Grim, Tomáš $u Department of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology, Palacký University, 17. listopadu 50, Olomouc 77146, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00182195 $t Scientific reports $x 2045-2322 $g Roč. 5, č. - (2015), s. 9060
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25762433 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160408 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160418110422 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1113893 $s 934832
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 5 $c - $d 9060 $e 20150312 $i 2045-2322 $m Scientific reports $n Sci Rep $x MED00182195
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160408

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...