Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Fluid management guided by a continuous non-invasive arterial pressure device is associated with decreased postoperative morbidity after total knee and hip replacement

J. Benes, L. Haidingerova, J. Pouska, J. Stepanik, A. Stenglova, J. Zatloukal, R. Pradl, I. Chytra, E. Kasal,

. 2015 ; 15 (-) : 148. [pub] 20151015

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Observational Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

BACKGROUND: The use of goal directed fluid protocols in intermediate risk patients undergoing hip or knee replacement was studied in few trials using invasive monitoring. For this reason we have implemented two different fluid management protocols, both based on a novel totally non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring device and compared them to the standard (no-protocol) treatment applied before the transition in our academic institution. METHODS: Three treatment groups were compared in this prospective study: the observational (CONTROL, N = 40) group before adoption of fluid protocols and two randomized groups after the transition to protocol fluid management with the use of the continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring (CNAP®) device. In the PRESSURE group (N = 40) standard variables were used for restrictive fluid therapy. Goal directed fluid therapy using pulse pressure variation was used in the GDFT arm (N = 40). The influence on the rate of postoperative complications, on the hospital length of stay and other parameters was assessed. RESULTS: Both protocols were associated with decreased fluid administration and maintained hemodynamic stability. Reduced rate of postoperative infection and organ complications (22 (55 %) vs. 33 (83 %) patients; p = 0.016; relative risk 0.67 (0.49-0.91)) was observed in the GDFT group compared to CONTROL. Lower number of patients receiving transfusion (4 (10 %) in GDFT vs. 17 (43 %) in CONTROL; p = 0.005) might contribute to this observation. No significant differences were observed in other end-points. CONCLUSION: In our study, the use of the fluid protocol based on pulse pressure variation assessed using continuous non-invasive arterial pressure measurement seems to be associated with a reduction in postoperative complications and transfusion needs as compared to standard no-protocol treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12612001014842.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16020216
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180605084616.0
007      
ta
008      
160722s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12871-015-0131-8 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12871-015-0131-8 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26471495
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Benes, Jan $u Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Teaching Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University Prague, alej Svobody 80, 306 40, Plzen, Czech Republic. benesj@fnplzen.cz.
245    10
$a Fluid management guided by a continuous non-invasive arterial pressure device is associated with decreased postoperative morbidity after total knee and hip replacement / $c J. Benes, L. Haidingerova, J. Pouska, J. Stepanik, A. Stenglova, J. Zatloukal, R. Pradl, I. Chytra, E. Kasal,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The use of goal directed fluid protocols in intermediate risk patients undergoing hip or knee replacement was studied in few trials using invasive monitoring. For this reason we have implemented two different fluid management protocols, both based on a novel totally non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring device and compared them to the standard (no-protocol) treatment applied before the transition in our academic institution. METHODS: Three treatment groups were compared in this prospective study: the observational (CONTROL, N = 40) group before adoption of fluid protocols and two randomized groups after the transition to protocol fluid management with the use of the continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring (CNAP®) device. In the PRESSURE group (N = 40) standard variables were used for restrictive fluid therapy. Goal directed fluid therapy using pulse pressure variation was used in the GDFT arm (N = 40). The influence on the rate of postoperative complications, on the hospital length of stay and other parameters was assessed. RESULTS: Both protocols were associated with decreased fluid administration and maintained hemodynamic stability. Reduced rate of postoperative infection and organ complications (22 (55 %) vs. 33 (83 %) patients; p = 0.016; relative risk 0.67 (0.49-0.91)) was observed in the GDFT group compared to CONTROL. Lower number of patients receiving transfusion (4 (10 %) in GDFT vs. 17 (43 %) in CONTROL; p = 0.005) might contribute to this observation. No significant differences were observed in other end-points. CONCLUSION: In our study, the use of the fluid protocol based on pulse pressure variation assessed using continuous non-invasive arterial pressure measurement seems to be associated with a reduction in postoperative complications and transfusion needs as compared to standard no-protocol treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12612001014842.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a arteriální tlak $x fyziologie $7 D062186
650    _2
$a náhrada kyčelního kloubu $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D019644
650    _2
$a totální endoprotéza kolene $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D019645
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a tekutinová terapie $x metody $7 D005440
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a peroperační monitorování $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D016343
650    _2
$a pooperační komplikace $x diagnóza $x etiologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D011183
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Haidingerová, Lenka $u Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Teaching Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University Prague, alej Svobody 80, 306 40, Plzen, Czech Republic. $7 xx0224968
700    1_
$a Pouska, Jiri $u Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Teaching Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University Prague, alej Svobody 80, 306 40, Plzen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Stepanik, Jan $u Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Teaching Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University Prague, alej Svobody 80, 306 40, Plzen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Stenglova, Alena $u Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Teaching Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University Prague, alej Svobody 80, 306 40, Plzen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Zatloukal, Jan $u Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Teaching Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University Prague, alej Svobody 80, 306 40, Plzen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Pradl, Richard $u Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Teaching Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University Prague, alej Svobody 80, 306 40, Plzen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Chytra, Ivan $u Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Teaching Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University Prague, alej Svobody 80, 306 40, Plzen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kasal, Eduard $u Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Teaching Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University Prague, alej Svobody 80, 306 40, Plzen, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00006769 $t BMC anesthesiology $x 1471-2253 $g Roč. 15, č. - (2015), s. 148
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26471495 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160722 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180605084818 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1154886 $s 944744
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 15 $c - $d 148 $e 20151015 $i 1471-2253 $m BMC anesthesiology $n BMC Anesthesiol $x MED00006769
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160722

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...