• Something wrong with this record ?

Does the Dumbbell-Carrying Position Change the Muscle Activity in Split Squats and Walking Lunges

P. Stastny, M. Lehnert, AM. Zaatar, Z. Svoboda, Z. Xaverova,

. 2015 ; 29 (11) : 3177-87.

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

The forward walking lunge (WL) and split squat (SSq) are similar exercises that have differences in the eccentric phase, and both can be performed in the ipsilateral or contralateral carrying conditions. This study aimed to determine the effects of dumbbell-carrying position on the kinematics and electromyographic (EMG) amplitudes of the gluteus medius (Gmed), vastus medialis (VM), vastus lateralis (VL), and biceps femoris during WLs and SSqs. The resistance-trained (RT) and the non-resistance-trained (NT) groups (both n = 14) performed ipsilateral WLs, contralateral WLs, ipsilateral SSqs, and contralateral SSqs in a randomized order in a simulated training session. The EMG amplitude, expressed as a percentage of the maximal voluntary isometric contraction (%MVIC), and the kinematics, expressed as the range of motion (ROM) of the hip and knee, were measured during 5 repetition maximum for both legs. The repeated measure analyses of variance showed significant differences between the RT and NT groups. The NT group showed a smaller knee flexion ROM (p < 0.001, η = 0.36) during both types of WLs, whereas the RT group showed a higher eccentric Gmed amplitude (p < 0.001, η = 0.46) during all exercises and a higher eccentric VL amplitude (p < 0.001, η = 0.63) during contralateral WLs. Further differences were found between contralateral and ipsilateral WLs in both the RT (p < 0.001, η = 0.69) and NT groups (p < 0.001, η = 0.80), and contralateral WLs resulted in higher eccentric Gmed amplitudes. Contralateral WLs highly activated the Gmed (90% MVIC); therefore, this exercise can increase the Gmed maximal strength. The ipsilateral loading condition did not increase the Gmed or VM activity in the RT or NT group.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16020812
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230627141455.0
007      
ta
008      
160722s2015 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000976 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000976 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25968228
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Stastny, Petr $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacky University in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Does the Dumbbell-Carrying Position Change the Muscle Activity in Split Squats and Walking Lunges / $c P. Stastny, M. Lehnert, AM. Zaatar, Z. Svoboda, Z. Xaverova,
520    9_
$a The forward walking lunge (WL) and split squat (SSq) are similar exercises that have differences in the eccentric phase, and both can be performed in the ipsilateral or contralateral carrying conditions. This study aimed to determine the effects of dumbbell-carrying position on the kinematics and electromyographic (EMG) amplitudes of the gluteus medius (Gmed), vastus medialis (VM), vastus lateralis (VL), and biceps femoris during WLs and SSqs. The resistance-trained (RT) and the non-resistance-trained (NT) groups (both n = 14) performed ipsilateral WLs, contralateral WLs, ipsilateral SSqs, and contralateral SSqs in a randomized order in a simulated training session. The EMG amplitude, expressed as a percentage of the maximal voluntary isometric contraction (%MVIC), and the kinematics, expressed as the range of motion (ROM) of the hip and knee, were measured during 5 repetition maximum for both legs. The repeated measure analyses of variance showed significant differences between the RT and NT groups. The NT group showed a smaller knee flexion ROM (p < 0.001, η = 0.36) during both types of WLs, whereas the RT group showed a higher eccentric Gmed amplitude (p < 0.001, η = 0.46) during all exercises and a higher eccentric VL amplitude (p < 0.001, η = 0.63) during contralateral WLs. Further differences were found between contralateral and ipsilateral WLs in both the RT (p < 0.001, η = 0.69) and NT groups (p < 0.001, η = 0.80), and contralateral WLs resulted in higher eccentric Gmed amplitudes. Contralateral WLs highly activated the Gmed (90% MVIC); therefore, this exercise can increase the Gmed maximal strength. The ipsilateral loading condition did not increase the Gmed or VM activity in the RT or NT group.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a biomechanika $x fyziologie $7 D001696
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    12
$a elektromyografie $7 D004576
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a isometrická kontrakce $x fyziologie $7 D007537
650    _2
$a dolní končetina $x fyziologie $7 D035002
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a kosterní svaly $x fyziologie $7 D018482
650    12
$a odporový trénink $7 D055070
650    _2
$a chůze $x fyziologie $7 D016138
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Lehnert, Michal
700    1_
$a Zaatar, Amr, $d 1973- $7 xx0154659
700    1_
$a Svoboda, Zdenek
700    1_
$a Xaverova, Zuzana
773    0_
$w MED00008742 $t Journal of strength and conditioning research $x 1533-4287 $g Roč. 29, č. 11 (2015), s. 3177-87
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25968228 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160722 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230627141452 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1155482 $s 945340
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 29 $c 11 $d 3177-87 $i 1533-4287 $m Journal of strength and conditioning research $n J Strength Cond Res $x MED00008742
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160722

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...