-
Something wrong with this record ?
Testing two nutrient profiling models of labelled foods and beverages marketed in Turkey
D. Dikmen, M. Kızıl, M. F. Uyar, G. Pekcan
Language English Country Czech Republic
Document type Journal Article
Digital library NLK
Source
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2004
ProQuest Central
from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2006-03-01 to 6 months ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 1993
- MeSH
- Food Analysis MeSH
- Consumer Health Information standards MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Beverages classification standards MeSH
- Nutritive Value * MeSH
- Product Labeling * MeSH
- Food classification standards MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Turkey MeSH
AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate the nutrient profile of labelled foods and also understand the application of two international nutrient profiling models of labelled foods and beverages. METHODS: WXYfm and NRF 9.3 nutrient profiling models were used to evaluate 3,171 labelled foods and beverages of 38 food categories and 500 different brands. RESULTS: According to the WXYfm model, pasta, grains and legumes and frozen foods had the best scores whereas oils had the worst scores. According to the NRF 9.3 model per 100 kcal, the best scores were obtained for frozen foods, grains and legumes and milk products whereas the confectionery foods had the worst scores. According to NRF 9.3 per serving size, grains and legumes had the best scores and flavoured milks had the worst scores. A comparison of WXYfm and NRF 9.3 nutrient profiling models ranked scores showed a high positive correlation (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The two nutrient models evaluated yielded similar results. Further studies are needed to test other category specific nutrient profiling models in order to understand how different models behave.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16025179
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160926111226.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160913s2015 xr f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.21101/cejph.a3992 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26851427
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Dikmen, Derya $u Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
- 245 10
- $a Testing two nutrient profiling models of labelled foods and beverages marketed in Turkey / $c D. Dikmen, M. Kızıl, M. F. Uyar, G. Pekcan
- 520 9_
- $a AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate the nutrient profile of labelled foods and also understand the application of two international nutrient profiling models of labelled foods and beverages. METHODS: WXYfm and NRF 9.3 nutrient profiling models were used to evaluate 3,171 labelled foods and beverages of 38 food categories and 500 different brands. RESULTS: According to the WXYfm model, pasta, grains and legumes and frozen foods had the best scores whereas oils had the worst scores. According to the NRF 9.3 model per 100 kcal, the best scores were obtained for frozen foods, grains and legumes and milk products whereas the confectionery foods had the worst scores. According to NRF 9.3 per serving size, grains and legumes had the best scores and flavoured milks had the worst scores. A comparison of WXYfm and NRF 9.3 nutrient profiling models ranked scores showed a high positive correlation (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The two nutrient models evaluated yielded similar results. Further studies are needed to test other category specific nutrient profiling models in order to understand how different models behave.
- 650 _2
- $a nápoje $x klasifikace $x normy $7 D001628
- 650 _2
- $a informace pro uživatele zdravotní péče $x normy $7 D054626
- 650 _2
- $a potraviny $x klasifikace $x normy $7 D005502
- 650 _2
- $a analýza potravin $7 D005504
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a nutriční hodnota $7 D009753
- 650 12
- $a označování výrobků $7 D011356
- 651 _2
- $a Turecko $7 D014421
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kızıl, Mevlüde $u Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
- 700 1_
- $a Uyar, Muhemmet Fatih $u Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
- 700 1_
- $a Pekcan, Gülden $u Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001083 $t Central European journal of public health $x 1210-7778 $g Roč. 23, č. 2 (2015), s. 131-136 (e 155-160)
- 856 41
- $u http://apps.szu.cz/svi/cejph/ $y domovská stránka časopisu
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b B 1829 $c 562 $y 4 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160913 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160926111601 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1163250 $s 949765
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 23 $c 2 $d 131-136 $f 155-160 $i 1210-7778 $m Central European Journal of Public Health $n Cent. Eur. J. Public Health $x MED00001083
- LZP __
- $b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20160913