Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Hysteroscopy in recurrent in-vitro fertilisation failure (TROPHY): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

T. El-Toukhy, R. Campo, Y. Khalaf, C. Tabanelli, L. Gianaroli, SS. Gordts, S. Gordts, G. Mestdagh, T. Mardesic, J. Voboril, GL. Marchino, C. Benedetto, T. Al-Shawaf, L. Sabatini, PT. Seed, M. Gergolet, G. Grimbizis, H. Harb, A. Coomarasamy,

. 2016 ; 387 (10038) : 2614-21. [pub] 20160427

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1992-01-04 to 3 months ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 1992-01-04 to 3 months ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1992-01-04 to 3 months ago
Family Health Database (ProQuest) from 1992-01-04 to 3 months ago
Psychology Database (ProQuest) from 1992-01-04 to 3 months ago
Health Management Database (ProQuest) from 1992-01-04 to 3 months ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest) from 1992-01-04 to 3 months ago

BACKGROUND: The success rate of in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) remains low and many women undergo multiple treatment cycles. A previous meta-analysis suggested hysteroscopy could improve outcomes in women who have had recurrent implantation failure; however, studies were of poor quality and a definitive randomised trial was needed. In the TROPHY trial we aimed to assess whether hysteroscopy improves the livebirth rate following IVF treatment in women with recurrent failure of implantation. METHODS: We did a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in eight hospitals in the UK, Belgium, Italy, and the Czech Republic. We recruited women younger than 38 years who had normal ultrasound of the uterine cavity and history of two to four unsuccessful IVF cycles. We used an independent web-based trial management system to randomly assign (1:1) women to receive outpatient hysteroscopy (hysteroscopy group) or no hysteroscopy (control group) in the month before starting a treatment cycle of IVF (with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection). A computer-based algorithm minimised for key prognostic variables: age, body-mass index, basal follicle-stimulating hormone concentration, and the number of previous failed IVF cycles. The order of group assignment was masked to the researchers at the time of recruitment and randomisation. Embryologists involved in the embryo transfer were masked to group allocation, but physicians doing the procedure knew of group assignment and had hysteroscopy findings accessible. Participants were not masked to their group assignment. The primary outcome was the livebirth rate (proportion of women who had a live baby beyond 24 weeks of gestation) in the intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered with the ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN35859078. FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2010, and Dec 31, 2013, we randomly assigned 350 women to the hysteroscopy group and 352 women to the control group. 102 (29%) of women in the hysteroscopy group had a livebirth after IVF compared with 102 (29%) women in the control group (risk ratio 1·0, 95% CI 0·79-1·25; p=0·96). No hysteroscopy-related adverse events were reported. INTERPRETATION: Outpatient hysteroscopy before IVF in women with a normal ultrasound of the uterine cavity and a history of unsuccessful IVF treatment cycles does not improve the livebirth rate. Further research into the effectiveness of surgical correction of specific uterine cavity abnormalities before IVF is warranted. FUNDING: European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16027536
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20161020115534.0
007      
ta
008      
161005s2016 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00258-0 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00258-0 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27132053
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a El-Toukhy, Tarek $u Assisted Conception Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: tarek.el-toukhy@gstt.nhs.uk.
245    10
$a Hysteroscopy in recurrent in-vitro fertilisation failure (TROPHY): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial / $c T. El-Toukhy, R. Campo, Y. Khalaf, C. Tabanelli, L. Gianaroli, SS. Gordts, S. Gordts, G. Mestdagh, T. Mardesic, J. Voboril, GL. Marchino, C. Benedetto, T. Al-Shawaf, L. Sabatini, PT. Seed, M. Gergolet, G. Grimbizis, H. Harb, A. Coomarasamy,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The success rate of in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) remains low and many women undergo multiple treatment cycles. A previous meta-analysis suggested hysteroscopy could improve outcomes in women who have had recurrent implantation failure; however, studies were of poor quality and a definitive randomised trial was needed. In the TROPHY trial we aimed to assess whether hysteroscopy improves the livebirth rate following IVF treatment in women with recurrent failure of implantation. METHODS: We did a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in eight hospitals in the UK, Belgium, Italy, and the Czech Republic. We recruited women younger than 38 years who had normal ultrasound of the uterine cavity and history of two to four unsuccessful IVF cycles. We used an independent web-based trial management system to randomly assign (1:1) women to receive outpatient hysteroscopy (hysteroscopy group) or no hysteroscopy (control group) in the month before starting a treatment cycle of IVF (with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection). A computer-based algorithm minimised for key prognostic variables: age, body-mass index, basal follicle-stimulating hormone concentration, and the number of previous failed IVF cycles. The order of group assignment was masked to the researchers at the time of recruitment and randomisation. Embryologists involved in the embryo transfer were masked to group allocation, but physicians doing the procedure knew of group assignment and had hysteroscopy findings accessible. Participants were not masked to their group assignment. The primary outcome was the livebirth rate (proportion of women who had a live baby beyond 24 weeks of gestation) in the intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered with the ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN35859078. FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2010, and Dec 31, 2013, we randomly assigned 350 women to the hysteroscopy group and 352 women to the control group. 102 (29%) of women in the hysteroscopy group had a livebirth after IVF compared with 102 (29%) women in the control group (risk ratio 1·0, 95% CI 0·79-1·25; p=0·96). No hysteroscopy-related adverse events were reported. INTERPRETATION: Outpatient hysteroscopy before IVF in women with a normal ultrasound of the uterine cavity and a history of unsuccessful IVF treatment cycles does not improve the livebirth rate. Further research into the effectiveness of surgical correction of specific uterine cavity abnormalities before IVF is warranted. FUNDING: European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a ambulantní chirurgické výkony $7 D000556
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a fertilizace in vitro $7 D005307
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a hysteroskopie $7 D015907
650    _2
$a ženská infertilita $x terapie $7 D007247
650    _2
$a narození živého dítěte $7 D050498
650    _2
$a těhotenství $7 D011247
650    _2
$a recidiva $7 D012008
650    _2
$a neúspěšná terapie $7 D017211
651    _2
$a Evropa $7 D005060
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Campo, Rudi $u Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Assisted Conception Unit, Genk, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Khalaf, Yacoub $u Assisted Conception Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
700    1_
$a Tabanelli, Carla $u SISMER, Assisted Conception Unit, Bologna, Italy.
700    1_
$a Gianaroli, Luca $u SISMER, Assisted Conception Unit, Bologna, Italy.
700    1_
$a Gordts, Sylvie S $u Leuven Institute for Fertility and Embryology, Tiensevest, Leuven, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Gordts, Stephan $u Leuven Institute for Fertility and Embryology, Tiensevest, Leuven, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Mestdagh, Greet $u Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Assisted Conception Unit, Genk, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Mardesic, Tonko $u The Sanatorium Pronatal, Assisted Conception Unit, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Voboril, Jan $u The Sanatorium Pronatal, Assisted Conception Unit, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Marchino, Gian L $u Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
700    1_
$a Benedetto, Chiara $u Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
700    1_
$a Al-Shawaf, Talha $u Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK. $7 gn_A_00004845
700    1_
$a Sabatini, Luca $u Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
700    1_
$a Seed, Paul T $u Division of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London and King's Health Partners, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
700    1_
$a Gergolet, Marco $u Reproductive Surgery Special Interest Group, European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, Brussels, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Grimbizis, Grigoris $u First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
700    1_
$a Harb, Hoda $u Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research and Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Care and Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
700    1_
$a Coomarasamy, Arri $u Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research and Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Care and Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
773    0_
$w MED00010161 $t Lancet (London, England) $x 1474-547X $g Roč. 387, č. 10038 (2016), s. 2614-21
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27132053 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20161005 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20161020115942 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1165850 $s 952166
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 387 $c 10038 $d 2614-21 $e 20160427 $i 1474-547X $m Lancet $n Lancet $x MED00010161
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20161005

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...