-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Conflict in Protected Areas: Who Says Co-Management Does Not Work
K. De Pourcq, E. Thomas, B. Arts, A. Vranckx, T. Léon-Sicard, P. Van Damme,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2006
Free Medical Journals
od 2006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
od 2006
PubMed Central
od 2006
Europe PubMed Central
od 2006
ProQuest Central
od 2006-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-10-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2006
- MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- střet zájmů * MeSH
- veřejné mínění MeSH
- zachování přírodních zdrojů * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Kolumbie MeSH
Natural resource-related conflicts can be extremely destructive and undermine environmental protection. Since the 1990 s co-management schemes, whereby the management of resources is shared by public and/or private sector stakeholders, have been a main strategy for reducing these conflicts worldwide. Despite initial high hopes, in recent years co-management has been perceived as falling short of expectations. However, systematic assessments of its role in conflict prevention or mitigation are non-existent. Interviews with 584 residents from ten protected areas in Colombia revealed that co-management can be successful in reducing conflict at grassroots level, as long as some critical enabling conditions, such as effective participation in the co-management process, are fulfilled not only on paper but also by praxis. We hope these findings will re-incentivize global efforts to make co-management work in protected areas and other common pool resource contexts, such as fisheries, agriculture, forestry and water management.
Bioversity International regional office for the Americas Cali Colombia
Conflict and Development studies Ghent University Gent Belgium
Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group Wageningen University Wageningen the Netherlands
Instituto de Estudios Ambientales Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogotá D C Colombia
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16027771
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20161005132355.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 161005s2015 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0144943 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0144943 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26714036
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a De Pourcq, Kobe $u Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Agriculture and Ethnobotany, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium. Conflict and Development studies, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium. Instituto de Estudios Ambientales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
- 245 10
- $a Conflict in Protected Areas: Who Says Co-Management Does Not Work / $c K. De Pourcq, E. Thomas, B. Arts, A. Vranckx, T. Léon-Sicard, P. Van Damme,
- 520 9_
- $a Natural resource-related conflicts can be extremely destructive and undermine environmental protection. Since the 1990 s co-management schemes, whereby the management of resources is shared by public and/or private sector stakeholders, have been a main strategy for reducing these conflicts worldwide. Despite initial high hopes, in recent years co-management has been perceived as falling short of expectations. However, systematic assessments of its role in conflict prevention or mitigation are non-existent. Interviews with 584 residents from ten protected areas in Colombia revealed that co-management can be successful in reducing conflict at grassroots level, as long as some critical enabling conditions, such as effective participation in the co-management process, are fulfilled not only on paper but also by praxis. We hope these findings will re-incentivize global efforts to make co-management work in protected areas and other common pool resource contexts, such as fisheries, agriculture, forestry and water management.
- 650 12
- $a střet zájmů $7 D016265
- 650 12
- $a zachování přírodních zdrojů $7 D003247
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a veřejné mínění $7 D011639
- 651 _2
- $a Kolumbie $7 D003105
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Thomas, Evert $u Bioversity International, regional office for the Americas, Cali, Colombia.
- 700 1_
- $a Arts, Bas $u Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands. $7 gn_A_00009041
- 700 1_
- $a Vranckx, An $u Conflict and Development studies, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
- 700 1_
- $a Léon-Sicard, Tomas $u Instituto de Estudios Ambientales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
- 700 1_
- $a Van Damme, Patrick $u Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Agriculture and Ethnobotany, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium. Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 10, č. 12 (2015), s. e0144943
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26714036 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20161005 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20161005132742 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1166085 $s 952401
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 10 $c 12 $d e0144943 $e 20151229 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20161005