• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparison of filtering methods, filter processing and DNA extraction kits for detection of mycobacteria in water

M. Kaevska, I. Slana,

. 2015 ; 22 (3) : 429-32.

Jazyk angličtina Země Polsko

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc16028183

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Mycobacteria have been isolated from almost all types of natural waters, as well as from man-made water distribution systems. Detection of mycobacteria using PCR has been described in different types of water; however, currently, there is no standardised protocol for the processing of large volumes of water. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the present study, different filtering methods are tested and optimised for tap or river water filtration up to 10 L, as well as filter processing and DNA isolation using four commercially available kits. RESULTS: The PowerWater DNA isolation kit (MoBio, USA), together with a kit used for soil and other environmental samples (PowerSoil DNA isolation kit, MoBio), had the highest efficiency. Filtration of 10 L of water and elution of the filter in PBS with the addition of 0.05% of Tween 80 is suggested. CONCLUSIONS: The described protocol for filter elution is recommended, and the use of the PowerWater DNA isolation kit for the highest mycobacterial DNA yield from water samples. The described protocol is suitable for parallel detection of mycobacteria using cultivation.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16028183
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20161018115736.0
007      
ta
008      
161005s2015 pl f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.5604/12321966.1167707 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.5604/12321966.1167707 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26403108
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a pl
100    1_
$a Kaevska, Marija $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Comparison of filtering methods, filter processing and DNA extraction kits for detection of mycobacteria in water / $c M. Kaevska, I. Slana,
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Mycobacteria have been isolated from almost all types of natural waters, as well as from man-made water distribution systems. Detection of mycobacteria using PCR has been described in different types of water; however, currently, there is no standardised protocol for the processing of large volumes of water. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the present study, different filtering methods are tested and optimised for tap or river water filtration up to 10 L, as well as filter processing and DNA isolation using four commercially available kits. RESULTS: The PowerWater DNA isolation kit (MoBio, USA), together with a kit used for soil and other environmental samples (PowerSoil DNA isolation kit, MoBio), had the highest efficiency. Filtration of 10 L of water and elution of the filter in PBS with the addition of 0.05% of Tween 80 is suggested. CONCLUSIONS: The described protocol for filter elution is recommended, and the use of the PowerWater DNA isolation kit for the highest mycobacterial DNA yield from water samples. The described protocol is suitable for parallel detection of mycobacteria using cultivation.
650    _2
$a DNA bakterií $x analýza $7 D004269
650    _2
$a monitorování životního prostředí $x metody $7 D004784
650    _2
$a filtrace $x metody $7 D005374
650    _2
$a sladká voda $x mikrobiologie $7 D005618
650    _2
$a Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis $x genetika $x izolace a purifikace $7 D016927
650    _2
$a kvantitativní polymerázová řetězová reakce $7 D060888
650    12
$a mikrobiologie vody $7 D014871
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Slana, Iva $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00172542 $t Annals of agricultural and environmental medicine AAEM $x 1898-2263 $g Roč. 22, č. 3 (2015), s. 429-32
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26403108 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20161005 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20161018120140 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1166497 $s 952813
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 22 $c 3 $d 429-32 $i 1898-2263 $m AAEM. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine $n AAEM. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. $x MED00172542
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20161005

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace