-
Something wrong with this record ?
Bacterial and eukaryotic biodiversity patterns in terrestrial and aquatic habitats in the Sør Rondane Mountains, Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica
D. Obbels, E. Verleyen, MJ. Mano, Z. Namsaraev, M. Sweetlove, B. Tytgat, R. Fernandez-Carazo, A. De Wever, S. D'hondt, D. Ertz, J. Elster, K. Sabbe, A. Willems, A. Wilmotte, W. Vyverman,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
PubMed Central
from 2015
ProQuest Central
from 2015-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2015-01-01 to 1 year ago
Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
from 1985-02-01
PubMed
26936447
DOI
10.1093/femsec/fiw041
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Acidobacteria genetics MeSH
- Actinobacteria genetics MeSH
- Bacteroidetes genetics MeSH
- Biodiversity MeSH
- Chlorophyta genetics MeSH
- Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis MeSH
- Ecosystem MeSH
- Fungi classification genetics MeSH
- Proteobacteria genetics MeSH
- Soil chemistry MeSH
- Soil Microbiology MeSH
- RNA, Ribosomal genetics MeSH
- Base Sequence MeSH
- Sequence Analysis, DNA MeSH
- Cyanobacteria genetics MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Antarctic Regions MeSH
The bacterial and microeukaryotic biodiversity were studied using pyrosequencing analysis on a 454 GS FLX+ platform of partial SSU rRNA genes in terrestrial and aquatic habitats of the Sør Rondane Mountains, including soils, on mosses, endolithic communities, cryoconite holes and supraglacial and subglacial meltwater lenses. This inventory was complemented with Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis targeting Chlorophyta and Cyanobacteria. OTUs belonging to the Rotifera, Chlorophyta, Tardigrada, Ciliophora, Cercozoa, Fungi, Bryophyta, Bacillariophyta, Collembola and Nematoda were present with a relative abundance of at least 0.1% in the eukaryotic communities. Cyanobacteria, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, FBP and Actinobacteria were the most abundant bacterial phyla. Multivariate analyses of the pyrosequencing data revealed a general lack of differentiation of both eukaryotes and prokaryotes according to habitat type. However, the bacterial community structure in the aquatic habitats was dominated by the filamentous cyanobacteria Leptolyngbya and appeared to be significantly different compared with those in dry soils, on mosses, and in endolithic habitats. A striking feature in all datasets was the detection of a relatively large amount of sequences new to science, which underscores the need for additional biodiversity assessments in Antarctic inland locations.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17000384
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170113114814.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170103s2016 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/femsec/fiw041 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/femsec/fiw041 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26936447
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Obbels, Dagmar $u Laboratory of Protistology and Aquatic Ecology, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, S8, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium dagmar.obbels@ugent.be.
- 245 10
- $a Bacterial and eukaryotic biodiversity patterns in terrestrial and aquatic habitats in the Sør Rondane Mountains, Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica / $c D. Obbels, E. Verleyen, MJ. Mano, Z. Namsaraev, M. Sweetlove, B. Tytgat, R. Fernandez-Carazo, A. De Wever, S. D'hondt, D. Ertz, J. Elster, K. Sabbe, A. Willems, A. Wilmotte, W. Vyverman,
- 520 9_
- $a The bacterial and microeukaryotic biodiversity were studied using pyrosequencing analysis on a 454 GS FLX+ platform of partial SSU rRNA genes in terrestrial and aquatic habitats of the Sør Rondane Mountains, including soils, on mosses, endolithic communities, cryoconite holes and supraglacial and subglacial meltwater lenses. This inventory was complemented with Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis targeting Chlorophyta and Cyanobacteria. OTUs belonging to the Rotifera, Chlorophyta, Tardigrada, Ciliophora, Cercozoa, Fungi, Bryophyta, Bacillariophyta, Collembola and Nematoda were present with a relative abundance of at least 0.1% in the eukaryotic communities. Cyanobacteria, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, FBP and Actinobacteria were the most abundant bacterial phyla. Multivariate analyses of the pyrosequencing data revealed a general lack of differentiation of both eukaryotes and prokaryotes according to habitat type. However, the bacterial community structure in the aquatic habitats was dominated by the filamentous cyanobacteria Leptolyngbya and appeared to be significantly different compared with those in dry soils, on mosses, and in endolithic habitats. A striking feature in all datasets was the detection of a relatively large amount of sequences new to science, which underscores the need for additional biodiversity assessments in Antarctic inland locations.
- 650 _2
- $a Acidobacteria $x genetika $7 D061271
- 650 _2
- $a Actinobacteria $x genetika $7 D039903
- 650 _2
- $a Antarktida $7 D000864
- 650 _2
- $a Bacteroidetes $x genetika $7 D041963
- 650 _2
- $a sekvence nukleotidů $7 D001483
- 650 _2
- $a biodiverzita $7 D044822
- 650 _2
- $a Chlorophyta $x genetika $7 D000460
- 650 _2
- $a sinice $x genetika $7 D000458
- 650 _2
- $a denaturační gradientová gelová elektroforéza $7 D058645
- 650 _2
- $a ekosystém $7 D017753
- 650 _2
- $a houby $x klasifikace $x genetika $7 D005658
- 650 _2
- $a Proteobacteria $x genetika $7 D020560
- 650 _2
- $a RNA ribozomální $x genetika $7 D012335
- 650 _2
- $a sekvenční analýza DNA $7 D017422
- 650 _2
- $a půda $x chemie $7 D012987
- 650 _2
- $a půdní mikrobiologie $7 D012988
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Verleyen, Elie $u Laboratory of Protistology and Aquatic Ecology, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, S8, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
- 700 1_
- $a Mano, Marie-José $u Centre for Protein Engineering, Institute of Chemistry, Université de Liège, Sart-TilmanB6, B-4000 Liège, Belgium.
- 700 1_
- $a Namsaraev, Zorigto $u Centre for Protein Engineering, Institute of Chemistry, Université de Liège, Sart-TilmanB6, B-4000 Liège, Belgium Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology RAS, Pr-t 60-letya Oktyabrya, 7/2, Moscow 117312, Russia NRC Kurchatov Institute, Akademika Kurchatova pl. 1, Moscow, 12 31 82, Russia.
- 700 1_
- $a Sweetlove, Maxime $u Laboratory of Protistology and Aquatic Ecology, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, S8, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
- 700 1_
- $a Tytgat, Bjorn $u Laboratory for Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
- 700 1_
- $a Fernandez-Carazo, Rafael $u Centre for Protein Engineering, Institute of Chemistry, Université de Liège, Sart-TilmanB6, B-4000 Liège, Belgium.
- 700 1_
- $a De Wever, Aaike $u Laboratory of Protistology and Aquatic Ecology, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, S8, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium Operational Directorate Natural Environment, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat 29, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
- 700 1_
- $a D'hondt, Sofie $u Laboratory of Protistology and Aquatic Ecology, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, S8, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
- 700 1_
- $a Ertz, Damien $u Botanic Garden Meise, Department Bryophytes-Thallophytes, Nieuwelaan 38, B-1860 Meise, Belgium Federation Wallonia-Brussels, General Administration of the Non-Compulsory Education and Scientific Research, Rue A. Lavallée 1, 1080 Brussels, Belgium.
- 700 1_
- $a Elster, Josef $u Centre for Polar Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, University of South Bohemia, Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Dukelská 135, 379 82, Třeboň, Czech republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Sabbe, Koen $u Laboratory of Protistology and Aquatic Ecology, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, S8, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
- 700 1_
- $a Willems, Anne $u Laboratory for Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
- 700 1_
- $a Wilmotte, Annick $u Centre for Protein Engineering, Institute of Chemistry, Université de Liège, Sart-TilmanB6, B-4000 Liège, Belgium.
- 700 1_
- $a Vyverman, Wim $u Laboratory of Protistology and Aquatic Ecology, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, S8, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001790 $t FEMS microbiology ecology $x 1574-6941 $g Roč. 92, č. 6 (2016), s. fiw041
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26936447 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170103 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170113114915 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1179524 $s 960951
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 92 $c 6 $d fiw041 $e 20160302 $i 1574-6941 $m FEMS microbiology ecology $n FEMS Microbiol Ecol $x MED00001790
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170103