-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Comparison of isocratic retention models for hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatographic separation of native and fluorescently labeled oligosaccharides
P. Česla, N. Vaňková, J. Křenková, J. Fischer,
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- 1-naftylamin chemie MeSH
- adsorpce MeSH
- aminopyridiny chemie MeSH
- chemické modely * MeSH
- chemické techniky analytické * MeSH
- chromatografie kapalinová * MeSH
- hydrofobní a hydrofilní interakce MeSH
- oligosacharidy chemie izolace a purifikace MeSH
- ortoaminobenzoáty chemie MeSH
- oxid křemičitý chemie MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
In this work, we have investigated retention of maltooligosaccharides and their fluorescent derivatives in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography using four different stationary phases. The non-derivatized maltooligosaccharides (maltose to maltoheptaose) and their derivatives with 2-aminobenzoic acid, 2-aminobenzamide, 2-aminopyridine and 8-aminonaphthalene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid were analyzed on silica gel, aminopropyl silica, amide (carbamoyl-bonded silica) and ZIC-HILIC zwitterionic sulfobetain bonded phase. The partitioning of the analytes between the bulk mobile phase and adsorbed water-rich layer, polar and ionic interactions of analytes with stationary phase have been evaluated and compared. The effects of the mobile phase additives (0.1% (v/v) of acetic acid and ammonium acetate in concentration range 5-30 mmol L(-1)) on retention were described. The suitability of different models for prediction of retention was tested including linear solvent strength model, quadratic model, mixed-mode model, and empirical Neue-Kuss model. The mixed-mode model was extended to the parameter describing the contribution of monomeric glucose unit to the retention of non-derivatized and derivatized maltooligosaccharides, which was used for evaluation of contribution of both, oligosaccharide backbone and end-group to retention.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17000418
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170103132948.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170103s2016 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.02.032 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.02.032 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26905882
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Česla, Petr $u Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Studentská 573, Pardubice CZ-53210, Czech Republic. Electronic address: Petr.Cesla@upce.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of isocratic retention models for hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatographic separation of native and fluorescently labeled oligosaccharides / $c P. Česla, N. Vaňková, J. Křenková, J. Fischer,
- 520 9_
- $a In this work, we have investigated retention of maltooligosaccharides and their fluorescent derivatives in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography using four different stationary phases. The non-derivatized maltooligosaccharides (maltose to maltoheptaose) and their derivatives with 2-aminobenzoic acid, 2-aminobenzamide, 2-aminopyridine and 8-aminonaphthalene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid were analyzed on silica gel, aminopropyl silica, amide (carbamoyl-bonded silica) and ZIC-HILIC zwitterionic sulfobetain bonded phase. The partitioning of the analytes between the bulk mobile phase and adsorbed water-rich layer, polar and ionic interactions of analytes with stationary phase have been evaluated and compared. The effects of the mobile phase additives (0.1% (v/v) of acetic acid and ammonium acetate in concentration range 5-30 mmol L(-1)) on retention were described. The suitability of different models for prediction of retention was tested including linear solvent strength model, quadratic model, mixed-mode model, and empirical Neue-Kuss model. The mixed-mode model was extended to the parameter describing the contribution of monomeric glucose unit to the retention of non-derivatized and derivatized maltooligosaccharides, which was used for evaluation of contribution of both, oligosaccharide backbone and end-group to retention.
- 650 _2
- $a 1-naftylamin $x chemie $7 D015057
- 650 _2
- $a adsorpce $7 D000327
- 650 _2
- $a aminopyridiny $x chemie $7 D000631
- 650 12
- $a chemické techniky analytické $7 D002623
- 650 12
- $a chromatografie kapalinová $7 D002853
- 650 _2
- $a hydrofobní a hydrofilní interakce $7 D057927
- 650 12
- $a chemické modely $7 D008956
- 650 _2
- $a oligosacharidy $x chemie $x izolace a purifikace $7 D009844
- 650 _2
- $a oxid křemičitý $x chemie $7 D012822
- 650 _2
- $a ortoaminobenzoáty $x chemie $7 D062367
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Vaňková, Nikola $u Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Studentská 573, Pardubice CZ-53210, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Křenková, Jana $u Institute of Analytical Chemistry of the CAS, v.v.i., Veveří 97, Brno CZ-60200 Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Fischer, Jan $u Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Studentská 573, Pardubice CZ-53210, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004962 $t Journal of chromatography. A $x 1873-3778 $g Roč. 1438, č. - (2016), s. 179-88
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26905882 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170103 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170103133035 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1179558 $s 960985
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 1438 $c - $d 179-88 $e 20160212 $i 1873-3778 $m Journal of chromatography. A, Including electrophoresis and other separation methods $n J Chromatogr A $x MED00004962
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170103