• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparison of isocratic retention models for hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatographic separation of native and fluorescently labeled oligosaccharides

P. Česla, N. Vaňková, J. Křenková, J. Fischer,

. 2016 ; 1438 (-) : 179-88. [pub] 20160212

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17000418

In this work, we have investigated retention of maltooligosaccharides and their fluorescent derivatives in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography using four different stationary phases. The non-derivatized maltooligosaccharides (maltose to maltoheptaose) and their derivatives with 2-aminobenzoic acid, 2-aminobenzamide, 2-aminopyridine and 8-aminonaphthalene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid were analyzed on silica gel, aminopropyl silica, amide (carbamoyl-bonded silica) and ZIC-HILIC zwitterionic sulfobetain bonded phase. The partitioning of the analytes between the bulk mobile phase and adsorbed water-rich layer, polar and ionic interactions of analytes with stationary phase have been evaluated and compared. The effects of the mobile phase additives (0.1% (v/v) of acetic acid and ammonium acetate in concentration range 5-30 mmol L(-1)) on retention were described. The suitability of different models for prediction of retention was tested including linear solvent strength model, quadratic model, mixed-mode model, and empirical Neue-Kuss model. The mixed-mode model was extended to the parameter describing the contribution of monomeric glucose unit to the retention of non-derivatized and derivatized maltooligosaccharides, which was used for evaluation of contribution of both, oligosaccharide backbone and end-group to retention.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17000418
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170103132948.0
007      
ta
008      
170103s2016 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.02.032 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.02.032 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26905882
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Česla, Petr $u Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Studentská 573, Pardubice CZ-53210, Czech Republic. Electronic address: Petr.Cesla@upce.cz.
245    10
$a Comparison of isocratic retention models for hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatographic separation of native and fluorescently labeled oligosaccharides / $c P. Česla, N. Vaňková, J. Křenková, J. Fischer,
520    9_
$a In this work, we have investigated retention of maltooligosaccharides and their fluorescent derivatives in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography using four different stationary phases. The non-derivatized maltooligosaccharides (maltose to maltoheptaose) and their derivatives with 2-aminobenzoic acid, 2-aminobenzamide, 2-aminopyridine and 8-aminonaphthalene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid were analyzed on silica gel, aminopropyl silica, amide (carbamoyl-bonded silica) and ZIC-HILIC zwitterionic sulfobetain bonded phase. The partitioning of the analytes between the bulk mobile phase and adsorbed water-rich layer, polar and ionic interactions of analytes with stationary phase have been evaluated and compared. The effects of the mobile phase additives (0.1% (v/v) of acetic acid and ammonium acetate in concentration range 5-30 mmol L(-1)) on retention were described. The suitability of different models for prediction of retention was tested including linear solvent strength model, quadratic model, mixed-mode model, and empirical Neue-Kuss model. The mixed-mode model was extended to the parameter describing the contribution of monomeric glucose unit to the retention of non-derivatized and derivatized maltooligosaccharides, which was used for evaluation of contribution of both, oligosaccharide backbone and end-group to retention.
650    _2
$a 1-naftylamin $x chemie $7 D015057
650    _2
$a adsorpce $7 D000327
650    _2
$a aminopyridiny $x chemie $7 D000631
650    12
$a chemické techniky analytické $7 D002623
650    12
$a chromatografie kapalinová $7 D002853
650    _2
$a hydrofobní a hydrofilní interakce $7 D057927
650    12
$a chemické modely $7 D008956
650    _2
$a oligosacharidy $x chemie $x izolace a purifikace $7 D009844
650    _2
$a oxid křemičitý $x chemie $7 D012822
650    _2
$a ortoaminobenzoáty $x chemie $7 D062367
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Vaňková, Nikola $u Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Studentská 573, Pardubice CZ-53210, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Křenková, Jana $u Institute of Analytical Chemistry of the CAS, v.v.i., Veveří 97, Brno CZ-60200 Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Fischer, Jan $u Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Studentská 573, Pardubice CZ-53210, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00004962 $t Journal of chromatography. A $x 1873-3778 $g Roč. 1438, č. - (2016), s. 179-88
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26905882 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20170103 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170103133035 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1179558 $s 960985
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 1438 $c - $d 179-88 $e 20160212 $i 1873-3778 $m Journal of chromatography. A, Including electrophoresis and other separation methods $n J Chromatogr A $x MED00004962
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20170103

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...