• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

EAU Guidelines on Diagnosis and Conservative Management of Urolithiasis

C. Türk, A. Petřík, K. Sarica, C. Seitz, A. Skolarikos, M. Straub, T. Knoll,

. 2016 ; 69 (3) : 468-74. [pub] 20150828

Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, směrnice pro lékařskou praxi, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17001037

CONTEXT: Low-dose computed tomography (CT) has become the first choice for detection of ureteral calculi. Conservative observational management of renal stones is possible, although the availability of minimally invasive treatment often leads to active treatment. Acute renal colic due to ureteral stone obstruction is an emergency that requires immediate pain management. Medical expulsive therapy (MET) for ureteral stones can support spontaneous passage in the absence of complicating factors. These guidelines summarise current recommendations for imaging, pain management, conservative treatment, and MET for renal and ureteral stones. Oral chemolysis is an option for uric acid stones. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the optimal measures for diagnosis and conservative and medical treatment of urolithiasis. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Several databases were searched for studies on imaging, pain management, observation, and MET for urolithiasis, with particular attention to the level of evidence. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Most patients with urolithiasis present with typical colic symptoms, but stones in the renal calices remain asymptomatic. Routine evaluation includes ultrasound imaging as the first-line modality. In acute disease, low-dose CT is the method of choice. Ureteral stones <6mm can pass spontaneously in well-controlled patients. Sufficient pain management is mandatory in acute renal colic. MET, usually with α-receptor antagonists, facilitates stone passage and reduces the need for analgesia. Contrast imaging is advised for accurate determination of the renal anatomy. Asymptomatic calyceal stones may be observed via active surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis, observational management, and medical treatment of urinary calculi are routine measures. Diagnosis is rapid using low-dose CT. However, radiation exposure is a limitation. Active treatment might not be necessary, especially for stones in the lower pole. MET is recommended to support spontaneous stone expulsion. PATIENT SUMMARY: For stones in the lower pole of the kidney, treatment may be postponed if there are no complaints. Pharmacological treatment may promote spontaneous stone passage.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17001037
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170113115201.0
007      
ta
008      
170103s2016 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.040 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.040 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26318710
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Türk, Christian $u Department of Urology, Rudolfstiftung Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
245    10
$a EAU Guidelines on Diagnosis and Conservative Management of Urolithiasis / $c C. Türk, A. Petřík, K. Sarica, C. Seitz, A. Skolarikos, M. Straub, T. Knoll,
520    9_
$a CONTEXT: Low-dose computed tomography (CT) has become the first choice for detection of ureteral calculi. Conservative observational management of renal stones is possible, although the availability of minimally invasive treatment often leads to active treatment. Acute renal colic due to ureteral stone obstruction is an emergency that requires immediate pain management. Medical expulsive therapy (MET) for ureteral stones can support spontaneous passage in the absence of complicating factors. These guidelines summarise current recommendations for imaging, pain management, conservative treatment, and MET for renal and ureteral stones. Oral chemolysis is an option for uric acid stones. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the optimal measures for diagnosis and conservative and medical treatment of urolithiasis. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Several databases were searched for studies on imaging, pain management, observation, and MET for urolithiasis, with particular attention to the level of evidence. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Most patients with urolithiasis present with typical colic symptoms, but stones in the renal calices remain asymptomatic. Routine evaluation includes ultrasound imaging as the first-line modality. In acute disease, low-dose CT is the method of choice. Ureteral stones <6mm can pass spontaneously in well-controlled patients. Sufficient pain management is mandatory in acute renal colic. MET, usually with α-receptor antagonists, facilitates stone passage and reduces the need for analgesia. Contrast imaging is advised for accurate determination of the renal anatomy. Asymptomatic calyceal stones may be observed via active surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis, observational management, and medical treatment of urinary calculi are routine measures. Diagnosis is rapid using low-dose CT. However, radiation exposure is a limitation. Active treatment might not be necessary, especially for stones in the lower pole. MET is recommended to support spontaneous stone expulsion. PATIENT SUMMARY: For stones in the lower pole of the kidney, treatment may be postponed if there are no complaints. Pharmacological treatment may promote spontaneous stone passage.
650    _2
$a asymptomatické nemoci $7 D058070
650    _2
$a diagnostické zobrazování $x normy $7 D003952
650    _2
$a diagnostické techniky urologické $x normy $7 D003950
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a urolitiáza $x komplikace $x diagnóza $x terapie $7 D052878
650    _2
$a urologie $x normy $7 D014572
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a směrnice pro lékařskou praxi $7 D017065
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Petřík, Aleš $u Department of Urology, Region Hospital, České Budějovice, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Sarica, Kemal $u Department of Urology, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
700    1_
$a Seitz, Christian $u Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
700    1_
$a Skolarikos, Andreas $u Second Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece.
700    1_
$a Straub, Michael $u Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
700    1_
$a Knoll, Thomas $u Department of Urology, Sindelfingen-Böblingen Medical Centre, University of Tübingen, Sindelfingen, Germany. Electronic address: t.knoll@klinikverbund-suedwest.de.
773    0_
$w MED00001669 $t European urology $x 1873-7560 $g Roč. 69, č. 3 (2016), s. 468-74
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26318710 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20170103 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170113115302 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1180177 $s 961604
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 69 $c 3 $d 468-74 $e 20150828 $i 1873-7560 $m European urology $n Eur Urol $x MED00001669
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20170103

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace