• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Relationship of differences in immunoglobulin heavy/light chain pairs (Hevylite), selected laboratory parameters and stratification systems in different immunochemical types of multiple myeloma

V. Scudla, P. Lochman, T. Pika, J. Minarik, J. Zapletalova, J. Bacovsky

. 2016 ; 160 (1) : 84-93. [pub] 20150804

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17006148

Grantová podpora
NT12451 MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), place increasing demands on accurate stratification of patients as the starting point for optimal individualized therapy. The present study focused on assessing the association between HLC levels and the HLC-r to parameters of MM activity, prognosis and tumor mass volume.The objective was to assess the correlation of immunoglobulin (Ig), heavy/light chain (HLC) pairs (IgG-κ and-λ, IgA-κ and -λ HLC) and the ratio of monoclonal involved-HLC (i-HLC) to polyclonal uninvolved (u-HLC) Ig concentrations assessed by the Hevylite(TM) method with the free light chain κ/λ ratio (FLC-r), selected prognostic laboratory parameters i.e. Hb, platelets, albumin, β2-microglobulin (β2-M), Ca, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatinine and the Durie-Salmon (D-S) and International Staging System (ISS), stages (1-3) for MM. METHODS: Hevylite assays were done on the sera of 132 MM patients at the time of diagnosis (IgG 94, IgA 38). HLC-r was calculated in the case of i-HLC-κ from the i-HLC-κ/u-HLC-λ ratio and for i-HLC-λ from the i-HLC-λ/u-HLC-κ ratio. D-S and ISS stages were evenly distributed. RESULTS: Md IgG-κ HLC-r was 64.8 (2.7-2222) and of IgG-λ HLC-r 49.6 (0.7-465.1), in the case of IgA-κ, Md HLC-r was 408.9 (3.4-3966) and for IgA-λ HLC-r the Md was 180.0 (0.1-3110). Normal levels of HLC pairs and HLC-r did not always rule out the diagnosis of MM. HLC-r correlated with FLC-r in IgG (r = 0.244, P = 0.018), but not in the IgA type. For IgG, HLC-r values were significantly different in patients with abnormal vs normal levels of Hb (P < 0.0001), albumin (P < 0.043), β2-M (P < 0.0001) and creatinine (P = 0.034) but not thrombocyte count, Ca or LDH. For the IgA isotype, we found a significant difference in HLC-r values only for thrombocyte count (P = 0.026) and β2-M (P = 0.016) but not for Hb, albumin, Ca, LDH or creatinine. For the IgG isotype there was a significant relationship of HLC-r index to stages 1-3 (P = 0.038) and substage A vs B (P = 0.048) according to D-S, and with high significance to stages 1-3 according to ISS (P = 0.005) and between stages 1 vs 3 (P = 0.001). For the IgA isotype, we found significant differences in HLC-r only between stages 1-3 (P = 0.025) according to D-S but not in the case of ISS. There were no significant correlations between i-HLC Ig levels and D-S or ISS stages in both IgG-κ and λ and IgA-κ and λ. Exceptions were significant differences for stages 1 vs 3 (P = 0.012) and 2 vs 3 (P = 0.017) for the IgG-λ isotype. There were no correlations of the HLC-r and u-HLC levels for either D-S or ISS stratifications in all HLC isotypes. CONCLUSION: We found a significant positive contribution of HLC-r using the i-HLC/u-HLC ratio even in the case of i-HLC-λ i.e. i-HLC-λ/u-HLC-κ. Variable results for the relationship of important laboratory parameters and D-S and ISS stratifications (stage 1-3) to HLC-r values in IgG and IgA isotypes make separate interpretation of the Hevylite method results necessary in clinical practice.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17006148
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20191106110126.0
007      
ta
008      
170210s2016 xr d f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.5507/bp.2015.032 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26365929
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Ščudla, Vlastimil, $u Department of Internal Medicine III - Nephrology, Rheumatology and Endocrinology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic; Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic $d 1946- $7 jn20000402953
245    10
$a Relationship of differences in immunoglobulin heavy/light chain pairs (Hevylite), selected laboratory parameters and stratification systems in different immunochemical types of multiple myeloma / $c V. Scudla, P. Lochman, T. Pika, J. Minarik, J. Zapletalova, J. Bacovsky
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), place increasing demands on accurate stratification of patients as the starting point for optimal individualized therapy. The present study focused on assessing the association between HLC levels and the HLC-r to parameters of MM activity, prognosis and tumor mass volume.The objective was to assess the correlation of immunoglobulin (Ig), heavy/light chain (HLC) pairs (IgG-κ and-λ, IgA-κ and -λ HLC) and the ratio of monoclonal involved-HLC (i-HLC) to polyclonal uninvolved (u-HLC) Ig concentrations assessed by the Hevylite(TM) method with the free light chain κ/λ ratio (FLC-r), selected prognostic laboratory parameters i.e. Hb, platelets, albumin, β2-microglobulin (β2-M), Ca, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatinine and the Durie-Salmon (D-S) and International Staging System (ISS), stages (1-3) for MM. METHODS: Hevylite assays were done on the sera of 132 MM patients at the time of diagnosis (IgG 94, IgA 38). HLC-r was calculated in the case of i-HLC-κ from the i-HLC-κ/u-HLC-λ ratio and for i-HLC-λ from the i-HLC-λ/u-HLC-κ ratio. D-S and ISS stages were evenly distributed. RESULTS: Md IgG-κ HLC-r was 64.8 (2.7-2222) and of IgG-λ HLC-r 49.6 (0.7-465.1), in the case of IgA-κ, Md HLC-r was 408.9 (3.4-3966) and for IgA-λ HLC-r the Md was 180.0 (0.1-3110). Normal levels of HLC pairs and HLC-r did not always rule out the diagnosis of MM. HLC-r correlated with FLC-r in IgG (r = 0.244, P = 0.018), but not in the IgA type. For IgG, HLC-r values were significantly different in patients with abnormal vs normal levels of Hb (P < 0.0001), albumin (P < 0.043), β2-M (P < 0.0001) and creatinine (P = 0.034) but not thrombocyte count, Ca or LDH. For the IgA isotype, we found a significant difference in HLC-r values only for thrombocyte count (P = 0.026) and β2-M (P = 0.016) but not for Hb, albumin, Ca, LDH or creatinine. For the IgG isotype there was a significant relationship of HLC-r index to stages 1-3 (P = 0.038) and substage A vs B (P = 0.048) according to D-S, and with high significance to stages 1-3 according to ISS (P = 0.005) and between stages 1 vs 3 (P = 0.001). For the IgA isotype, we found significant differences in HLC-r only between stages 1-3 (P = 0.025) according to D-S but not in the case of ISS. There were no significant correlations between i-HLC Ig levels and D-S or ISS stages in both IgG-κ and λ and IgA-κ and λ. Exceptions were significant differences for stages 1 vs 3 (P = 0.012) and 2 vs 3 (P = 0.017) for the IgG-λ isotype. There were no correlations of the HLC-r and u-HLC levels for either D-S or ISS stratifications in all HLC isotypes. CONCLUSION: We found a significant positive contribution of HLC-r using the i-HLC/u-HLC ratio even in the case of i-HLC-λ i.e. i-HLC-λ/u-HLC-κ. Variable results for the relationship of important laboratory parameters and D-S and ISS stratifications (stage 1-3) to HLC-r values in IgG and IgA isotypes make separate interpretation of the Hevylite method results necessary in clinical practice.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a imunoglobulin A $x metabolismus $7 D007070
650    _2
$a imunoglobulin G $x metabolismus $7 D007074
650    _2
$a těžké řetězce imunoglobulinů $x metabolismus $7 D007143
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a mnohočetný myelom $x krev $x klasifikace $x diagnóza $7 D009101
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Lochman, Pavel $u Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 xx0019284
700    1_
$a Pika, Tomáš $u Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 xx0071238
700    1_
$a Minařík, Jiří $u Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 xx0106330
700    1_
$a Zapletalová, Jana $u Department of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic. $7 xx0111614
700    1_
$a Bačovský, Jaroslav $u Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 xx0053311
773    0_
$w MED00012606 $t Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czech Republic $x 1213-8118 $g Roč. 160, č. 1 (2016), s. 84-93
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 1502 $c 958 $y 4 $z 0
990    __
$a 20170210 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20191106110356 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1192631 $s 966795
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 160 $c 1 $d 84-93 $e 20150804 $i 1213-8118 $m Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc Czech Republic $n Biomed. Pap. Fac. Med. Palacký Univ. Olomouc Czech Repub. (Print) $x MED00012606
GRA    __
$a NT12451 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20170210

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace