Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Standard approaches to the acetabulum. Part 1, Kocher-Langenbeck approach [Standardní přístupy k acetabulu. Část 1, Kocherův-Langenbeckův přístup]

A. Gänsslen, S. Grechenig, M. Nerlich, M. Müller

. 2016 ; 83 (3) : 141-146.

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17010347

Historically, standard approaches for surgical treatment of displaced acetabular fractures were the KocherLangenbeck approach, the ilioinguinal approach and the extended iliofemoral approach (12). Presently, several modifications of these approaches are accepted alternatives, especially anterior modifications based on the intrapelvic approach described by Hirvensalo (8). Single access approaches allowing visualization of one acetabular column are the posterior Kocher-Langenbeck approach and the anterior ilioinguinal approach (12) and the use of a single approach is favoured (9, 24). For more complex situations, in the 80s and 90s extended approaches (extended iliofemoral approach according to Letournel (12), its modification to Reinert (19) (Baltimore approach), and the Triradiate approach according to Mears (14)) were introduced. These approaches are presently rarely choosen due to the extensive soft tissue dissection and higher complication rates (28). Alternatively, the combination of an anterior and posterior standard approach was recommended (7, 21, 22) having the disadvantage of longer operating time and blood loss and showed no superior results compared to a single approach. The meta-analysis by Giannoudis et al. stated that 48,7% of patients were treated using the Kocher-Langenbeck approach, followed by 21,9% ilioinguinal approaches and 12,4% extended approaches (6). More recent data from the years 2005-2007, showed that anterior approaches are now predominantly used according to a higher number of acetabular fractures with anterior column involvement. Overall, more than 40% of all patients with acetabular fractures are still approached via the Kocher-Langenbeck approach (18). Therefore, the Kocher-Langenbeck approach is still a "working horse" in approaching displaced acetabular fractures. The Kocher-Langenbeck approach consists of two parts. In 1874 von Langenbeck described a longitudinal incision starting from above the greater sciatic notch to the greater trochanter, dissecting the gluteal muscles for treating hip joint infections (11). Theodor Kocher in 1911 described a curved incision starting from the posterior-inferior corner of the greater trochanter, running across the postero-superior tip of the greater trochanter passing oblique in line with the fibres of the gluteus maximus muscle in direction to the posterior superior iliac spine (10). The aim of the present analysis is the detailed anatomi - cal analysis of this standard approach, focusing on fracture indication, positioning of the patient, exposure, dissection, reduction techniques of special fracture types, approach modifications/extensions, complications and approach-specific results.

Standardní přístupy k acetabulu. Část 1, Kocherův-Langenbeckův přístup

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17010347
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170404112147.0
007      
ta
008      
170320s2016 xr a f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.55095/achot2016/021 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27484070
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Gänsslen, A $u Klinik für Unfallchirurgie Orthopädie und Handchirurgie Klinikum der Stadt Wolfsburg, Germany
245    1_
$a Standard approaches to the acetabulum. $n Part 1, $p Kocher-Langenbeck approach / $c A. Gänsslen, S. Grechenig, M. Nerlich, M. Müller
246    31
$a Standardní přístupy k acetabulu. $n Část 1, $p Kocherův-Langenbeckův přístup
520    3_
$a Historically, standard approaches for surgical treatment of displaced acetabular fractures were the KocherLangenbeck approach, the ilioinguinal approach and the extended iliofemoral approach (12). Presently, several modifications of these approaches are accepted alternatives, especially anterior modifications based on the intrapelvic approach described by Hirvensalo (8). Single access approaches allowing visualization of one acetabular column are the posterior Kocher-Langenbeck approach and the anterior ilioinguinal approach (12) and the use of a single approach is favoured (9, 24). For more complex situations, in the 80s and 90s extended approaches (extended iliofemoral approach according to Letournel (12), its modification to Reinert (19) (Baltimore approach), and the Triradiate approach according to Mears (14)) were introduced. These approaches are presently rarely choosen due to the extensive soft tissue dissection and higher complication rates (28). Alternatively, the combination of an anterior and posterior standard approach was recommended (7, 21, 22) having the disadvantage of longer operating time and blood loss and showed no superior results compared to a single approach. The meta-analysis by Giannoudis et al. stated that 48,7% of patients were treated using the Kocher-Langenbeck approach, followed by 21,9% ilioinguinal approaches and 12,4% extended approaches (6). More recent data from the years 2005-2007, showed that anterior approaches are now predominantly used according to a higher number of acetabular fractures with anterior column involvement. Overall, more than 40% of all patients with acetabular fractures are still approached via the Kocher-Langenbeck approach (18). Therefore, the Kocher-Langenbeck approach is still a "working horse" in approaching displaced acetabular fractures. The Kocher-Langenbeck approach consists of two parts. In 1874 von Langenbeck described a longitudinal incision starting from above the greater sciatic notch to the greater trochanter, dissecting the gluteal muscles for treating hip joint infections (11). Theodor Kocher in 1911 described a curved incision starting from the posterior-inferior corner of the greater trochanter, running across the postero-superior tip of the greater trochanter passing oblique in line with the fibres of the gluteus maximus muscle in direction to the posterior superior iliac spine (10). The aim of the present analysis is the detailed anatomi - cal analysis of this standard approach, focusing on fracture indication, positioning of the patient, exposure, dissection, reduction techniques of special fracture types, approach modifications/extensions, complications and approach-specific results.
650    _2
$a acetabuloplastika $x metody $7 D065526
650    _2
$a acetabulum $x zranění $x chirurgie $7 D000077
650    _2
$a krvácení při operaci $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D016063
650    _2
$a fixace fraktury $x metody $7 D005592
650    _2
$a vnitřní fixace fraktury $x metody $7 D005593
650    _2
$a fraktury kostí $x chirurgie $7 D050723
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a délka operace $7 D061646
650    _2
$a polohování pacienta $7 D056888
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Grechenig, S $u Klinik für Unfallchirurgie Orthopädie und Handchirurgie Klinikum der Stadt Wolfsburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Nerlich, M $u Klinik für Unfallchirurgie Orthopädie und Handchirurgie Klinikum der Stadt Wolfsburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Müller, M $u Klinik für Unfallchirurgie Orthopädie und Handchirurgie Klinikum der Stadt Wolfsburg, Germany
773    0_
$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 83, č. 3 (2016), s. 141-146
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y 4 $z 0
990    __
$a 20170320 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170330095653 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1197266 $s 971063
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 83 $c 3 $d 141-146 $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20170320

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...