Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Terapie periprotetických zlomenin femuru po implantaci totální endoprotézy kyčelního kloubu
[Treatment for periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty]

R. Kunovský, T. Pink, A. Shaker, J. Jarošík, L. Paša, R. Veselý

. 2016 ; 83 (5) : 317-326.

Jazyk čeština Země Česko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17010364

Digitální knihovna NLK
Zdroj

E-zdroje Online

NLK Free Medical Journals od 2006

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY To give a description of the patient group, risk factors, classification, therapeutic procedures and treatment outcomes in periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty treated in the Trauma Hospital in Brno. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study comprised of 51 patients treated for a periprosthetic femoral fracture between 2003 and 2013. This included 19 (37%) intra-operative and 32 (63%) post-operative fractures. According to the Vancouver classification, the types of fractures were as follows: 9 patients A; 21 B1; 9 B2; 6 B3 and 6 with type C. RESULTS Type A fractures were treated conservatively. Although pseudoarthrosis of the greater trochanter occurred, the patients had no clinical problems. The intra-operative type B1 fractures were managed by cerclage tapes in nine patients and the post-operative B1 fractures were treated by plate osteosynthesis in 10 patients and femoral stem reimplantation in two patients. All post-operative type B2 and type B3 fractures were managed by reimplantation of the femoral stem and type C fractures were treated by plate osteosynthesis. Serious complications requiring revision surgery were recorded in five patients; they included plate failure in two B1 fractures, dislocation of a B2 fracture, a dislocation with femoral component rotation in a B3 fracture and failure of the plate in a type C fracture. CONCLUSIONS The treatment of a periprosthetic fracture can affect the patient's life. In view of the fracture type, implant type, general health of the patient and all risk factors, the authors prefer one-stage surgical treatment. The Vancouver classification is a guidleine for the therapeutic plan. Osteosynthesis as a single procedure is indicated only if the femoral component is stable and well fixed. When the stem in B2 and B3 fractures is loose, revision surgery with stem replacement is necessary. Key words: periprosthetic fracture, total hip atrhroplasty, Vancouver classification.

Treatment for periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17010364
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170404112142.0
007      
ta
008      
170320s2016 xr a f 000 0|cze||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.55095/achot2016/050 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28102806
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Kunovský, Radek $u Oddělení klinické ortopedie, Úrazová nemocnice, Brno $7 xx0107045
245    10
$a Terapie periprotetických zlomenin femuru po implantaci totální endoprotézy kyčelního kloubu / $c R. Kunovský, T. Pink, A. Shaker, J. Jarošík, L. Paša, R. Veselý
246    31
$a Treatment for periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty
520    9_
$a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY To give a description of the patient group, risk factors, classification, therapeutic procedures and treatment outcomes in periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty treated in the Trauma Hospital in Brno. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study comprised of 51 patients treated for a periprosthetic femoral fracture between 2003 and 2013. This included 19 (37%) intra-operative and 32 (63%) post-operative fractures. According to the Vancouver classification, the types of fractures were as follows: 9 patients A; 21 B1; 9 B2; 6 B3 and 6 with type C. RESULTS Type A fractures were treated conservatively. Although pseudoarthrosis of the greater trochanter occurred, the patients had no clinical problems. The intra-operative type B1 fractures were managed by cerclage tapes in nine patients and the post-operative B1 fractures were treated by plate osteosynthesis in 10 patients and femoral stem reimplantation in two patients. All post-operative type B2 and type B3 fractures were managed by reimplantation of the femoral stem and type C fractures were treated by plate osteosynthesis. Serious complications requiring revision surgery were recorded in five patients; they included plate failure in two B1 fractures, dislocation of a B2 fracture, a dislocation with femoral component rotation in a B3 fracture and failure of the plate in a type C fracture. CONCLUSIONS The treatment of a periprosthetic fracture can affect the patient's life. In view of the fracture type, implant type, general health of the patient and all risk factors, the authors prefer one-stage surgical treatment. The Vancouver classification is a guidleine for the therapeutic plan. Osteosynthesis as a single procedure is indicated only if the femoral component is stable and well fixed. When the stem in B2 and B3 fractures is loose, revision surgery with stem replacement is necessary. Key words: periprosthetic fracture, total hip atrhroplasty, Vancouver classification.
650    _2
$a náhrada kyčelního kloubu $x škodlivé účinky $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D019644
650    _2
$a fraktury femuru $x klasifikace $x chirurgie $7 D005264
650    _2
$a femur $x cytologie $7 D005269
650    _2
$a vnitřní fixace fraktury $7 D005593
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a periprotetické fraktury $x klasifikace $x chirurgie $7 D057068
650    _2
$a reoperace $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D012086
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a transplantace kmenových buněk $7 D033581
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Pink, Tomáš, $d 1971- $7 xx0103364 $u Oddělení klinické ortopedie, Úrazová nemocnice, Brno
700    1_
$a Shaker, A. $7 _AN090933 $u Oddělení klinické ortopedie, Úrazová nemocnice, Brno; Klinika traumatologie Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno
700    1_
$a Jarošík, Juraj $7 xx0300553 $u Oddělení klinické ortopedie, Úrazová nemocnice, Brno
700    1_
$a Paša, Libor, $d 1959-2022 $7 xx0037097 $u Klinika traumatologie Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno
700    1_
$a Veselý, Radek, $d 1972- $7 mzk2011673138 $u Klinika traumatologie Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno
773    0_
$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 83, č. 5 (2016), s. 317-326
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y 4 $z 0
990    __
$a 20170320 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170330141504 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1197283 $s 971080
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 83 $c 5 $d 317-326 $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20170320

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...