-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Comparison of simple extraction procedures in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry based determination of serum 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one, a surrogate marker of bile acid synthesis
M. Leníček, M. Vecka, K. Žížalová, L. Vítek,
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články
- MeSH
- biologické markery krev MeSH
- cholestenony krev MeSH
- chromatografie kapalinová metody MeSH
- fosfolipidy izolace a purifikace MeSH
- hmotnostní spektrometrie metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- žlučové kyseliny a soli biosyntéza MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
The serum concentration of 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4), a marker of cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase activity, has recently become an attractive diagnostic tool for researchers interested in cholesterol and bile acid metabolism. The rapidly increasing demand of C4 measurement led to the development of various fast, mostly mass spectrometry-based analytical methods. Our aim was to compare four simple (i.e., not requiring solid phase extraction) extraction procedures (two "one-phase", and two "two-phase") in terms of basic analytical performance and their labouriousness. All methods exhibited comparable extraction recoveries (ranging from 88 to 97%) and intra-assay precision (variation coefficients below 10%), and failed in the removal of phospholipids. Although marked differences were observed in desalting and deproteination, all methods can be considered satisfactory. Simple acetonitrile precipitation can be recommended if a fast extraction and minimal hands-on time is preferred; while two-phase ammonium sulphate:acetonitrile extraction should be chosen when maximal deproteination is required.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17013553
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170502094931.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170413s2016 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.08.046 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27598558
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Leníček, Martin $u Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Kateřinská 32, 12108 Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: martin.lenicek@lf1.cuni.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of simple extraction procedures in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry based determination of serum 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one, a surrogate marker of bile acid synthesis / $c M. Leníček, M. Vecka, K. Žížalová, L. Vítek,
- 520 9_
- $a The serum concentration of 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4), a marker of cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase activity, has recently become an attractive diagnostic tool for researchers interested in cholesterol and bile acid metabolism. The rapidly increasing demand of C4 measurement led to the development of various fast, mostly mass spectrometry-based analytical methods. Our aim was to compare four simple (i.e., not requiring solid phase extraction) extraction procedures (two "one-phase", and two "two-phase") in terms of basic analytical performance and their labouriousness. All methods exhibited comparable extraction recoveries (ranging from 88 to 97%) and intra-assay precision (variation coefficients below 10%), and failed in the removal of phospholipids. Although marked differences were observed in desalting and deproteination, all methods can be considered satisfactory. Simple acetonitrile precipitation can be recommended if a fast extraction and minimal hands-on time is preferred; while two-phase ammonium sulphate:acetonitrile extraction should be chosen when maximal deproteination is required.
- 650 _2
- $a žlučové kyseliny a soli $x biosyntéza $7 D001647
- 650 _2
- $a biologické markery $x krev $7 D015415
- 650 _2
- $a cholestenony $x krev $7 D002783
- 650 _2
- $a chromatografie kapalinová $x metody $7 D002853
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a hmotnostní spektrometrie $x metody $7 D013058
- 650 _2
- $a fosfolipidy $x izolace a purifikace $7 D010743
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Vecka, Marek $u Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Kateřinská 32, 12108 Prague, Czech Republic; 4th Department of Internal Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Kateřinská 32, 12108 Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Žížalová, Kateřina $u Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Kateřinská 32, 12108 Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Vítek, Libor $u Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Kateřinská 32, 12108 Prague, Czech Republic; 4th Department of Internal Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Kateřinská 32, 12108 Prague, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006642 $t Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences $x 1873-376X $g Roč. 1033-1034, č. - (2016), s. 317-20
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27598558 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170413 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170502095257 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1200018 $s 974331
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 1033-1034 $c - $d 317-20 $e 20160831 $i 1873-376X $m Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences $n J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci $x MED00006642
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170413