• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Monitoring CO2 emissions to gain a dynamic view of carbon allocation to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

R. Slavíková, D. Püschel, M. Janoušková, M. Hujslová, T. Konvalinková, H. Gryndlerová, M. Gryndler, M. Weiser, J. Jansa,

. 2017 ; 27 (1) : 35-51. [pub] 20160822

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17013579
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 2003-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2011-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2003-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

Quantification of carbon (C) fluxes in mycorrhizal plants is one of the important yet little explored tasks of mycorrhizal physiology and ecology. (13)CO2 pulse-chase labelling experiments are increasingly being used to track the fate of C in these plant-microbial symbioses. Nevertheless, continuous monitoring of both the below- and aboveground CO2 emissions remains a challenge, although it is necessary to establish the full C budget of mycorrhizal plants. Here, a novel CO2 collection system is presented which allows assessment of gaseous CO2 emissions (including isotopic composition of their C) from both belowground and shoot compartments. This system then is used to quantify the allocation of recently fixed C in mycorrhizal versus nonmycorrhizal Medicago truncatula plants with comparable biomass and mineral nutrition. Using this system, we confirmed substantially greater belowground C drain in mycorrhizal versus nonmycorrhizal plants, with the belowground CO2 emissions showing large variation because of fluctuating environmental conditions in the glasshouse. Based on the assembled (13)C budget, the C allocation to the mycorrhizal fungus was between 2.3% (increased (13)C allocation to mycorrhizal substrate) and 2.9% (reduction of (13)C allocation to mycorrhizal shoots) of the plant gross photosynthetic production. Although the C allocation to shoot respiration (measured during one night only) did not differ between the mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal plants under our experimental conditions, it presented a substantial part (∼10%) of the plant C budget, comparable to the amount of CO2 released belowground. These results advocate quantification of both above- and belowground CO2 emissions in future studies.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17013579
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170427104331.0
007      
ta
008      
170413s2017 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00572-016-0731-2 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27549438
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Slavíková, Renata $u Laboratory of Fungal Biology, Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 14220, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Monitoring CO2 emissions to gain a dynamic view of carbon allocation to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi / $c R. Slavíková, D. Püschel, M. Janoušková, M. Hujslová, T. Konvalinková, H. Gryndlerová, M. Gryndler, M. Weiser, J. Jansa,
520    9_
$a Quantification of carbon (C) fluxes in mycorrhizal plants is one of the important yet little explored tasks of mycorrhizal physiology and ecology. (13)CO2 pulse-chase labelling experiments are increasingly being used to track the fate of C in these plant-microbial symbioses. Nevertheless, continuous monitoring of both the below- and aboveground CO2 emissions remains a challenge, although it is necessary to establish the full C budget of mycorrhizal plants. Here, a novel CO2 collection system is presented which allows assessment of gaseous CO2 emissions (including isotopic composition of their C) from both belowground and shoot compartments. This system then is used to quantify the allocation of recently fixed C in mycorrhizal versus nonmycorrhizal Medicago truncatula plants with comparable biomass and mineral nutrition. Using this system, we confirmed substantially greater belowground C drain in mycorrhizal versus nonmycorrhizal plants, with the belowground CO2 emissions showing large variation because of fluctuating environmental conditions in the glasshouse. Based on the assembled (13)C budget, the C allocation to the mycorrhizal fungus was between 2.3% (increased (13)C allocation to mycorrhizal substrate) and 2.9% (reduction of (13)C allocation to mycorrhizal shoots) of the plant gross photosynthetic production. Although the C allocation to shoot respiration (measured during one night only) did not differ between the mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal plants under our experimental conditions, it presented a substantial part (∼10%) of the plant C budget, comparable to the amount of CO2 released belowground. These results advocate quantification of both above- and belowground CO2 emissions in future studies.
650    _2
$a uhlík $x metabolismus $7 D002244
650    _2
$a oxid uhličitý $x chemie $x metabolismus $7 D002245
650    _2
$a Glomeromycota $x fyziologie $7 D055137
650    _2
$a Medicago truncatula $x metabolismus $x mikrobiologie $7 D046913
650    _2
$a mykorhiza $x metabolismus $7 D038821
650    _2
$a fotosyntéza $x fyziologie $7 D010788
650    _2
$a kořeny rostlin $x metabolismus $7 D018517
650    _2
$a výhonky rostlin $x metabolismus $7 D018520
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Püschel, David $u Laboratory of Fungal Biology, Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 14220, Prague 4, Czech Republic. Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Zámek 1, 252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Janoušková, Martina $u Laboratory of Fungal Biology, Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 14220, Prague 4, Czech Republic. Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Zámek 1, 252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hujslová, Martina $u Laboratory of Fungal Biology, Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 14220, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Konvalinková, Tereza $u Laboratory of Fungal Biology, Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 14220, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Gryndlerová, Hana $u Laboratory of Fungal Biology, Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 14220, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Gryndler, Milan $u Laboratory of Fungal Biology, Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 14220, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Weiser, Martin $u Faculty of Science, Department of Botany, Charles University in Prague, Benátská 2, 128 01, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Jansa, Jan $u Laboratory of Fungal Biology, Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 14220, Prague 4, Czech Republic. jansa@biomed.cas.cz.
773    0_
$w MED00180395 $t Mycorrhiza $x 1432-1890 $g Roč. 27, č. 1 (2017), s. 35-51
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27549438 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20170413 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170427104651 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1200044 $s 974357
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 27 $c 1 $d 35-51 $e 20160822 $i 1432-1890 $m Mycorrhiza $n Mycorrhiza $x MED00180395
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20170413

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...