-
Something wrong with this record ?
The Use of the Er:YAG Laser for Bracket Debonding and Its Effect on Enamel Damage
T. Dostalova, H. Jelinkova, M. Remes, J. Šulc, M. Němec,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
27415584
DOI
10.1089/pho.2016.4115
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Lasers, Solid-State * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Microscopy, Electron, Scanning MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Molar, Third MeSH
- Orthodontic Brackets * MeSH
- Surface Properties MeSH
- In Vitro Techniques MeSH
- Materials Testing MeSH
- Dental Debonding instrumentation MeSH
- Dental Enamel injuries radiation effects MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of Er:YAG laser irradiation on the debonding of metal and ceramic brackets and enamel damage ex vivo. BACKGROUND DATA: The principle of safe bracket debonding is to degrade the adhesive resin strength connecting the tooth and bracket. Removal of adhesive resin from tooth surfaces without iatrogenic damage (enamel loss) is generally the main problem of the otherwise very successful method of aesthetic straightening of teeth. METHODS: Forty ceramic and metal brackets (Clarity™ Advanced and Victory Series™; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA) were standardly bonded to buccal polished enamel surfaces of 30 caries-free human third molars. Two types of adhesive resins (Transbond™ XT Light Cure Adhesive; 3M Unitek, and Variolink II Professional Set; Ivoclar Vivadent AG) were used. Before debonding, the brackets in the laser group were irradiated with the Er:YAG laser (FJFI CVUT) 280 mJ, 250 μs long, repetition rate 6 Hz, spot focus 1 mm, and 140 sec. The control group was debonded without the laser irradiation. During the bracket irradiation, temperature changes inside the tooth were monitored using a thermal image infrared camera. The enamel surface was investigated by SEM. RESULTS: It has been observed that bracket removal was easier after the Er:YAG laser irradiation, and temperature rise was limited (from 2.0°C to 3.2°C) also for metal brackets. As against the nonirradiated samples, SEM investigation has confirmed no damage to enamel. CONCLUSIONS: Irradiation with Er:YAG laser radiation before debonding of ceramic brackets significantly decreases the bonding failure and amount of remaining adhesive.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17013666
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170426094652.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170413s2016 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1089/pho.2016.4115 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27415584
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Dostalova, Tatjana $u 1 Department of Stomatology, 2nd Medical Faculty and FN Motol, Charles University , Prague, Czech Republic .
- 245 14
- $a The Use of the Er:YAG Laser for Bracket Debonding and Its Effect on Enamel Damage / $c T. Dostalova, H. Jelinkova, M. Remes, J. Šulc, M. Němec,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of Er:YAG laser irradiation on the debonding of metal and ceramic brackets and enamel damage ex vivo. BACKGROUND DATA: The principle of safe bracket debonding is to degrade the adhesive resin strength connecting the tooth and bracket. Removal of adhesive resin from tooth surfaces without iatrogenic damage (enamel loss) is generally the main problem of the otherwise very successful method of aesthetic straightening of teeth. METHODS: Forty ceramic and metal brackets (Clarity™ Advanced and Victory Series™; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA) were standardly bonded to buccal polished enamel surfaces of 30 caries-free human third molars. Two types of adhesive resins (Transbond™ XT Light Cure Adhesive; 3M Unitek, and Variolink II Professional Set; Ivoclar Vivadent AG) were used. Before debonding, the brackets in the laser group were irradiated with the Er:YAG laser (FJFI CVUT) 280 mJ, 250 μs long, repetition rate 6 Hz, spot focus 1 mm, and 140 sec. The control group was debonded without the laser irradiation. During the bracket irradiation, temperature changes inside the tooth were monitored using a thermal image infrared camera. The enamel surface was investigated by SEM. RESULTS: It has been observed that bracket removal was easier after the Er:YAG laser irradiation, and temperature rise was limited (from 2.0°C to 3.2°C) also for metal brackets. As against the nonirradiated samples, SEM investigation has confirmed no damage to enamel. CONCLUSIONS: Irradiation with Er:YAG laser radiation before debonding of ceramic brackets significantly decreases the bonding failure and amount of remaining adhesive.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a zubní lepené konstrukce - odstranění $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D017005
- 650 _2
- $a zubní sklovina $x zranění $x účinky záření $7 D003743
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a techniky in vitro $7 D066298
- 650 12
- $a lasery pevnolátkové $7 D053844
- 650 _2
- $a testování materiálů $7 D008422
- 650 _2
- $a mikroskopie elektronová rastrovací $7 D008855
- 650 _2
- $a molár třetí $7 D008964
- 650 12
- $a ortodontické zámky $7 D016910
- 650 _2
- $a povrchové vlastnosti $7 D013499
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Jelinkova, Helena $u 2 Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague , Prague, Czech Republic .
- 700 1_
- $a Remes, Marek $u 1 Department of Stomatology, 2nd Medical Faculty and FN Motol, Charles University , Prague, Czech Republic .
- 700 1_
- $a Šulc, Jan $u 2 Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague , Prague, Czech Republic .
- 700 1_
- $a Němec, Michal $u 2 Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague , Prague, Czech Republic .
- 773 0_
- $w MED00181053 $t Photomedicine and laser surgery $x 1557-8550 $g Roč. 34, č. 9 (2016), s. 394-9
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27415584 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170413 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170426095011 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1200131 $s 974444
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 34 $c 9 $d 394-9 $e 20160714 $i 1557-8550 $m Photomedicine and laser surgery $n Photomed Laser Surg $x MED00181053
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170413