• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Examining exposure reciprocity in a resin based composite using high irradiance levels and real-time degree of conversion values

D. Selig, T. Haenel, B. Hausnerová, B. Moeginger, D. Labrie, B. Sullivan, RB. Price,

. 2015 ; 31 (5) : 583-93. [pub] 20150321

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17014310

OBJECTIVE: Exposure reciprocity suggests that, as long as the same radiant exposure is delivered, different combinations of irradiance and exposure time will achieve the same degree of resin polymerization. This study examined the validity of exposure reciprocity using real time degree of conversion results from one commercial flowable dental resin. Additionally a new fitting function to describe the polymerization kinetics is proposed. METHODS: A Plasma Arc Light Curing Unit (LCU) was used to deliver 0.75, 1.2, 1.5, 3.7 or 7.5 W/cm(2) to 2mm thick samples of Tetric EvoFlow (Ivoclar Vivadent). The irradiances and radiant exposures received by the resin were determined using an integrating sphere connected to a fiber-optic spectrometer. The degree of conversion (DC) was recorded at a rate of 8.5 measurements a second at the bottom of the resin using attenuated total reflectance Fourier Transform mid-infrared spectroscopy (FT-MIR). Five specimens were exposed at each irradiance level. The DC reached after 170s and after 5, 10 and 15 J/cm(2) had been delivered was compared using analysis of variance and Fisher's PLSD post hoc multiple comparison tests (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: The same DC values were not reached after the same radiant exposures of 5, 10 and 15 J/cm(2) had been delivered at an irradiance of 3.7 and 7.5 W/cm(2). Thus exposure reciprocity was not supported for Tetric EvoFlow (p<0.05). SIGNIFICANCE: For Tetric EvoFlow, there was no significant difference in the DC when 5, 10 and 15J/cm(2) were delivered at irradiance levels of 0.75, 1.2 and 1.5 W/cm(2). The optimum combination of irradiance and exposure time for this commercial dental resin may be close to 1.5 W/cm(2) for 12s.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17014310
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170428111205.0
007      
ta
008      
170413s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.010 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25804190
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Selig, Daniela $u Dalhousie University, Department of Dental Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Halifax, Canada; Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences, Department of Natural Sciences, Rheinbach, Germany; FH Aachen University of Applied Sciences, Department of Natural Sciences, Jülich, Germany.
245    10
$a Examining exposure reciprocity in a resin based composite using high irradiance levels and real-time degree of conversion values / $c D. Selig, T. Haenel, B. Hausnerová, B. Moeginger, D. Labrie, B. Sullivan, RB. Price,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: Exposure reciprocity suggests that, as long as the same radiant exposure is delivered, different combinations of irradiance and exposure time will achieve the same degree of resin polymerization. This study examined the validity of exposure reciprocity using real time degree of conversion results from one commercial flowable dental resin. Additionally a new fitting function to describe the polymerization kinetics is proposed. METHODS: A Plasma Arc Light Curing Unit (LCU) was used to deliver 0.75, 1.2, 1.5, 3.7 or 7.5 W/cm(2) to 2mm thick samples of Tetric EvoFlow (Ivoclar Vivadent). The irradiances and radiant exposures received by the resin were determined using an integrating sphere connected to a fiber-optic spectrometer. The degree of conversion (DC) was recorded at a rate of 8.5 measurements a second at the bottom of the resin using attenuated total reflectance Fourier Transform mid-infrared spectroscopy (FT-MIR). Five specimens were exposed at each irradiance level. The DC reached after 170s and after 5, 10 and 15 J/cm(2) had been delivered was compared using analysis of variance and Fisher's PLSD post hoc multiple comparison tests (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: The same DC values were not reached after the same radiant exposures of 5, 10 and 15 J/cm(2) had been delivered at an irradiance of 3.7 and 7.5 W/cm(2). Thus exposure reciprocity was not supported for Tetric EvoFlow (p<0.05). SIGNIFICANCE: For Tetric EvoFlow, there was no significant difference in the DC when 5, 10 and 15J/cm(2) were delivered at irradiance levels of 0.75, 1.2 and 1.5 W/cm(2). The optimum combination of irradiance and exposure time for this commercial dental resin may be close to 1.5 W/cm(2) for 12s.
650    _2
$a složené pryskyřice $x chemie $x účinky záření $7 D003188
650    _2
$a stomatologické polymerizační lampy $7 D055117
650    12
$a dentální adheziva tuhnoucí světlem $7 D055115
650    _2
$a testování materiálů $7 D008422
650    _2
$a polymerizace $7 D058105
650    _2
$a spektroskopie infračervená s Fourierovou transformací $7 D017550
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Haenel, Thomas $u Dalhousie University, Department of Dental Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Halifax, Canada; Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences, Department of Natural Sciences, Rheinbach, Germany; Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Faculty of Technology, Department of Production Engineering, Zlin, Czech Republic; Tomas Bata University in Zlin, University Institute, Centre of Polymer Systems, Zlin, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hausnerová, Berenika $u Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Faculty of Technology, Department of Production Engineering, Zlin, Czech Republic; Tomas Bata University in Zlin, University Institute, Centre of Polymer Systems, Zlin, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Moeginger, Bernhard $u Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences, Department of Natural Sciences, Rheinbach, Germany.
700    1_
$a Labrie, Daniel $u Dalhousie University, Department of Physics and Atmospheric Sciences, Halifax, Canada.
700    1_
$a Sullivan, Braden $u Dalhousie University, Department of Dental Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Halifax, Canada.
700    1_
$a Price, Richard B T $u Dalhousie University, Department of Dental Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Halifax, Canada. Electronic address: rbprice@dal.ca.
773    0_
$w MED00001334 $t Dental materials official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials $x 1879-0097 $g Roč. 31, č. 5 (2015), s. 583-93
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25804190 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20170413 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170428111526 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1200775 $s 975088
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 31 $c 5 $d 583-93 $e 20150321 $i 1879-0097 $m Dental materials $n Dent Mater $x MED00001334
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20170413

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace