Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

The disadvantages of being a hybrid during drought: A combined analysis of plant morphology, physiology and leaf proteome in maize

D. Holá, M. Benešová, L. Fischer, D. Haisel, F. Hnilička, H. Hniličková, PL. Jedelský, M. Kočová, D. Procházková, O. Rothová, L. Tůmová, N. Wilhelmová,

. 2017 ; 12 (4) : e0176121. [pub] 20170418

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17023135

A comparative analysis of various parameters that characterize plant morphology, growth, water status, photosynthesis, cell damage, and antioxidative and osmoprotective systems together with an iTRAQ analysis of the leaf proteome was performed in two inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.) differing in drought susceptibility and their reciprocal F1 hybrids. The aim of this study was to dissect the parent-hybrid relationships to better understand the mechanisms of the heterotic effect and its potential association with the stress response. The results clearly showed that the four examined genotypes have completely different strategies for coping with limited water availability and that the inherent properties of the F1 hybrids, i.e. positive heterosis in morphological parameters (or, more generally, a larger plant body) becomes a distinct disadvantage when the water supply is limited. However, although a greater loss of photosynthetic efficiency was an inherent disadvantage, the precise causes and consequences of the original predisposition towards faster growth and biomass accumulation differed even between reciprocal hybrids. Both maternal and paternal parents could be imitated by their progeny in some aspects of the drought response (e.g., the absence of general protein down-regulation, changes in the levels of some carbon fixation or other photosynthetic proteins). Nevertheless, other features (e.g., dehydrin or light-harvesting protein contents, reduced chloroplast proteosynthesis) were quite unique to a particular hybrid. Our study also confirmed that the strategy for leaving stomata open even when the water supply is limited (coupled to a smaller body size and some other physiological properties), observed in one of our inbred lines, is associated with drought-resistance not only during mild drought (as we showed previously) but also during more severe drought conditions.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17023135
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170720122209.0
007      
ta
008      
170720s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0176121 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28419152
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Holá, Dana $u Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
245    14
$a The disadvantages of being a hybrid during drought: A combined analysis of plant morphology, physiology and leaf proteome in maize / $c D. Holá, M. Benešová, L. Fischer, D. Haisel, F. Hnilička, H. Hniličková, PL. Jedelský, M. Kočová, D. Procházková, O. Rothová, L. Tůmová, N. Wilhelmová,
520    9_
$a A comparative analysis of various parameters that characterize plant morphology, growth, water status, photosynthesis, cell damage, and antioxidative and osmoprotective systems together with an iTRAQ analysis of the leaf proteome was performed in two inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.) differing in drought susceptibility and their reciprocal F1 hybrids. The aim of this study was to dissect the parent-hybrid relationships to better understand the mechanisms of the heterotic effect and its potential association with the stress response. The results clearly showed that the four examined genotypes have completely different strategies for coping with limited water availability and that the inherent properties of the F1 hybrids, i.e. positive heterosis in morphological parameters (or, more generally, a larger plant body) becomes a distinct disadvantage when the water supply is limited. However, although a greater loss of photosynthetic efficiency was an inherent disadvantage, the precise causes and consequences of the original predisposition towards faster growth and biomass accumulation differed even between reciprocal hybrids. Both maternal and paternal parents could be imitated by their progeny in some aspects of the drought response (e.g., the absence of general protein down-regulation, changes in the levels of some carbon fixation or other photosynthetic proteins). Nevertheless, other features (e.g., dehydrin or light-harvesting protein contents, reduced chloroplast proteosynthesis) were quite unique to a particular hybrid. Our study also confirmed that the strategy for leaving stomata open even when the water supply is limited (coupled to a smaller body size and some other physiological properties), observed in one of our inbred lines, is associated with drought-resistance not only during mild drought (as we showed previously) but also during more severe drought conditions.
650    _2
$a aklimatizace $7 D000064
650    _2
$a chiméra $x genetika $x fyziologie $7 D002678
650    _2
$a období sucha $7 D055864
650    12
$a hybridní efekt $7 D006823
650    _2
$a fotosyntéza $7 D010788
650    _2
$a listy rostlin $x anatomie a histologie $x genetika $x fyziologie $7 D018515
650    _2
$a rostlinné proteiny $x analýza $x metabolismus $7 D010940
650    _2
$a proteom $x analýza $x metabolismus $7 D020543
650    _2
$a fyziologický stres $7 D013312
650    _2
$a voda $x metabolismus $7 D014867
650    _2
$a kukuřice setá $x anatomie a histologie $x genetika $x fyziologie $7 D003313
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Benešová, Monika $u Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Fischer, Lukáš $u Department of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Haisel, Daniel $u Institute of Experimental Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hnilička, František $u Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hniličková, Helena $u Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Jedelský, Petr L $u Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kočová, Marie $u Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Procházková, Dagmar $u Institute of Experimental Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Rothová, Olga $u Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Tůmová, Lenka $u Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Wilhelmová, Naďa $u Institute of Experimental Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 12, č. 4 (2017), s. e0176121
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28419152 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20170720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170720122703 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1238816 $s 984048
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 12 $c 4 $d e0176121 $e 20170418 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20170720

Find record

Citation metrics

Logged in users only

Archiving options