Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Effect of Accelerometer Cut-Off Points on the Recommended Level of Physical Activity for Obesity Prevention in Children

A. Gába, J. Dygrýn, J. Mitáš, L. Jakubec, K. Frömel,

. 2016 ; 11 (10) : e0164282. [pub] 20161010

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

There is no general consensus regarding which accelerometer cut-off point (CoP) is most acceptable to estimate the time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in children and choice of an appropriate CoP primarily remains a subjective decision. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the influence of CoP selection on the mean MVPA and to define the optimal thresholds of MVPA derived from different accelerometer CoPs to avoid overweight/obesity and adiposity in children aged 7 to 12 years. Three hundred six children participated. Physical activity (PA) was monitored for seven consecutive days using an ActiGraph accelerometer (model GT3X) and the intensity of PA was estimated using the five most frequently published CoPs. Body adiposity was assessed using a multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis. There was found a wide range of mean levels of MVPA that ranged from 27 (Puyau CoP) to 231 min∙d-1 (Freedson 2005 CoP). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that the optimal thresholds for counts per minute (cpm) and MVPA derived from the Puyau CoP was the most useful in classifying children according to their body mass index (BMI) and fat mass percentage (FM%). In the total sample, the optimal thresholds of the MVPA derived from the Puyau CoP were 22 and 23 min∙d-1 when the categories based on BMI and FM%, respectively, were used. The children who did not meet these optimal thresholds had a significantly increased risk of being overweight/obese (OR = 2.88, P < 0.01) and risk of having excess fat mass (OR = 2.41, P < 0.01). In conclusion, the decision of selecting among various CoPs significantly influences the optimal levels of MVPA. The Puyau CoP of 3 200 cmp seems to be the most useful for defining the optimal level of PA for pediatric obesity prevention.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17023645
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170720122310.0
007      
ta
008      
170720s2016 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0164282 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27723835
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Gába, Aleš $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, třída Míru 117, 771 11, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Effect of Accelerometer Cut-Off Points on the Recommended Level of Physical Activity for Obesity Prevention in Children / $c A. Gába, J. Dygrýn, J. Mitáš, L. Jakubec, K. Frömel,
520    9_
$a There is no general consensus regarding which accelerometer cut-off point (CoP) is most acceptable to estimate the time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in children and choice of an appropriate CoP primarily remains a subjective decision. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the influence of CoP selection on the mean MVPA and to define the optimal thresholds of MVPA derived from different accelerometer CoPs to avoid overweight/obesity and adiposity in children aged 7 to 12 years. Three hundred six children participated. Physical activity (PA) was monitored for seven consecutive days using an ActiGraph accelerometer (model GT3X) and the intensity of PA was estimated using the five most frequently published CoPs. Body adiposity was assessed using a multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis. There was found a wide range of mean levels of MVPA that ranged from 27 (Puyau CoP) to 231 min∙d-1 (Freedson 2005 CoP). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that the optimal thresholds for counts per minute (cpm) and MVPA derived from the Puyau CoP was the most useful in classifying children according to their body mass index (BMI) and fat mass percentage (FM%). In the total sample, the optimal thresholds of the MVPA derived from the Puyau CoP were 22 and 23 min∙d-1 when the categories based on BMI and FM%, respectively, were used. The children who did not meet these optimal thresholds had a significantly increased risk of being overweight/obese (OR = 2.88, P < 0.01) and risk of having excess fat mass (OR = 2.41, P < 0.01). In conclusion, the decision of selecting among various CoPs significantly influences the optimal levels of MVPA. The Puyau CoP of 3 200 cmp seems to be the most useful for defining the optimal level of PA for pediatric obesity prevention.
650    _2
$a akcelerometrie $7 D061725
650    _2
$a adipozita $7 D050154
650    _2
$a plocha pod křivkou $7 D019540
650    _2
$a index tělesné hmotnosti $7 D015992
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    12
$a cvičení $7 D015444
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a odds ratio $7 D016017
650    _2
$a obezita dětí a dospívajících $x prevence a kontrola $7 D063766
650    _2
$a ROC křivka $7 D012372
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Dygrýn, Jan $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, třída Míru 117, 771 11, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Mitáš, Josef $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, třída Míru 117, 771 11, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Jakubec, Lukáš $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, třída Míru 117, 771 11, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Frömel, Karel $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, třída Míru 117, 771 11, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 11, č. 10 (2016), s. e0164282
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27723835 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20170720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170720122803 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1239326 $s 984558
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 11 $c 10 $d e0164282 $e 20161010 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20170720

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...