• Something wrong with this record ?

Quality of preimplantation embryos recovered in vivo from dairy cows in relation to their body condition

AV. Makarevich, L. Stádník, E. Kubovičová, Z. Hegedüšová, R. Holásek, F. Louda, J. Beran, M. Nejdlová,

. 2016 ; 24 (3) : 378-88.

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

This study examined the impact of cow body condition on the quality of bovine preimplantation embryos. The embryos (n = 107) were flushed from dairy cows and classified according to a five-point scale body condition score (BCS2 n = 17; BCS3 n = 31; BCS4 n = 11) on the 7th day after insemination and then analyzed for development, dead cell index (DCI), cell number and actin cytoskeleton quality. The highest embryo recovery rate (P < 0.05) was recorded in the BCS3 group and the lowest in the BCS4 group. More transferable (morula, blastocyst) embryos were obtained from the BCS4 cows (79%), compared with the BCS2 (64%) or BCS3 (63%) animals. However, cell numbers were higher in the BCS2 and BCS3 groups (P < 0.05) compared with the BCS4 embryos. Conversely, the DCI was lowest in the BCS2 (3.88%; P < 0.05) and highest in the BCS4 (6.56%) embryos. The proportion of embryos with the best actin quality (grade I) was higher in the BCS2 and BCS3 cows compared with the BCS4 group. Almost 25% of all embryos showed fragmented morphology and a higher DCI (5.65%) than normal morulas (1.76%). More fragmented embryos were revealed in the BCS2 (28.6%) and BCS4 (31.25%) groups, and less (19.15%) in the BCS3 group. The cell numbers in such embryos were lower in the BCS4 (22.57) than in the BCS2 (46.25) or BCS3 (42.4) groups. In conclusion, the body condition of dairy cows affects the quality of preimplantation embryos. A BCS over 3.0 resulted in a higher incidence of poor (fragmented) embryos.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17023990
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170830095607.0
007      
ta
008      
170720s2016 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1017/S0967199415000295 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27172055
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Makarevich, A V $u Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra,Hlohovecká 2,951 41 Lužianky near Nitra,Slovak Republic.
245    10
$a Quality of preimplantation embryos recovered in vivo from dairy cows in relation to their body condition / $c AV. Makarevich, L. Stádník, E. Kubovičová, Z. Hegedüšová, R. Holásek, F. Louda, J. Beran, M. Nejdlová,
520    9_
$a This study examined the impact of cow body condition on the quality of bovine preimplantation embryos. The embryos (n = 107) were flushed from dairy cows and classified according to a five-point scale body condition score (BCS2 n = 17; BCS3 n = 31; BCS4 n = 11) on the 7th day after insemination and then analyzed for development, dead cell index (DCI), cell number and actin cytoskeleton quality. The highest embryo recovery rate (P < 0.05) was recorded in the BCS3 group and the lowest in the BCS4 group. More transferable (morula, blastocyst) embryos were obtained from the BCS4 cows (79%), compared with the BCS2 (64%) or BCS3 (63%) animals. However, cell numbers were higher in the BCS2 and BCS3 groups (P < 0.05) compared with the BCS4 embryos. Conversely, the DCI was lowest in the BCS2 (3.88%; P < 0.05) and highest in the BCS4 (6.56%) embryos. The proportion of embryos with the best actin quality (grade I) was higher in the BCS2 and BCS3 cows compared with the BCS4 group. Almost 25% of all embryos showed fragmented morphology and a higher DCI (5.65%) than normal morulas (1.76%). More fragmented embryos were revealed in the BCS2 (28.6%) and BCS4 (31.25%) groups, and less (19.15%) in the BCS3 group. The cell numbers in such embryos were lower in the BCS4 (22.57) than in the BCS2 (46.25) or BCS3 (42.4) groups. In conclusion, the body condition of dairy cows affects the quality of preimplantation embryos. A BCS over 3.0 resulted in a higher incidence of poor (fragmented) embryos.
650    _2
$a mikrofilamenta $x metabolismus $7 D008841
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a apoptóza $7 D017209
650    _2
$a blastocysta $x cytologie $x metabolismus $7 D001755
650    _2
$a skot $7 D002417
650    _2
$a počet buněk $7 D002452
650    _2
$a buněčné dělení $7 D002455
650    _2
$a mlékárenství $7 D003612
650    _2
$a přenos embrya $x metody $7 D004624
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a fertilizace in vitro $x metody $7 D005307
650    _2
$a koncové značení zlomů DNA in situ $7 D020287
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a konfokální mikroskopie $7 D018613
650    _2
$a morula $x cytologie $x metabolismus $7 D009028
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Stádník, L $u Czech University of Life Sciences Prague,Faculty of Agrobiology,Food and Natural Resources,Department of Animal Husbandry,Kamýcká 129,165 21 Prague 6 - Suchdol,Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kubovičová, E $u National Agricultural and Food Centre,Research Institute of Animal Production Nitra,951 41 Lužianky near Nitra,Slovak Republic.
700    1_
$a Hegedüšová, Z $u Institute for Cattle Breeding Ltd.Rapotin,Vyzkumniku 267,788 13 Vikyrovice,Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Holásek, R $u Institute for Cattle Breeding Ltd.Rapotin,Vyzkumniku 267,788 13 Vikyrovice,Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Louda, F $u Institute for Cattle Breeding Ltd.Rapotin,Vyzkumniku 267,788 13 Vikyrovice,Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Beran, J $u Czech University of Life Sciences Prague,Faculty of Agrobiology,Food and Natural Resources,Department of Animal Husbandry,Kamýcká 129,165 21 Prague 6 - Suchdol,Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Nejdlová, M $u Czech University of Life Sciences Prague,Faculty of Agrobiology,Food and Natural Resources,Department of Animal Husbandry,Kamýcká 129,165 21 Prague 6 - Suchdol,Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00004864 $t Zygote (Cambridge, England) $x 1469-8730 $g Roč. 24, č. 3 (2016), s. 378-88
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27172055 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20170720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170830100156 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1239671 $s 984903
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 24 $c 3 $d 378-88 $i 1469-8730 $m Zygote $n Zygote $x MED00004864
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20170720

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...