-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Development, validation and comparison of UHPSFC and UHPLC methods for the determination of agomelatine and its impurities
K. Plachká, L. Chrenková, M. Douša, L. Nováková,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, validační studie
- MeSH
- acetamidy analýza MeSH
- koncentrace vodíkových iontů MeSH
- referenční standardy MeSH
- tablety MeSH
- vysokoúčinná kapalinová chromatografie metody MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- validační studie MeSH
Agomelatine is one of the newest antidepressants. Due to a different mechanism of action it offers a completely new approach in the treatment of depressive disorders. Two chromatographic methods for determination of agomelatine and its impurities were developed. The separations on UHPSFC system were accomplished using stationary phase based on BEH 2-EP and gradient elution with CO2 and methanol containing 20mM ammonium formate and 5% of water. The UHPLC separations were performed on stationary phase BEH Shield RP18. The mixture of acetonitrile and methanol in ratio 1:1 and ammonium acetate buffer pH 9.5 were used as mobile phase. Both developed methods were properly validated in terms of linearity, sensitivity (LOD, LOQ), accuracy and precision according to ICH guidelines. The UHPSFC method was linear in the range 0.25-70μg/ml for all analytes with method accuracy ≥97.4% and ≥100.2% and method intra-day precision RSD ≤2.4 and ≤0.8 for impurities and API (active pharmaceutical ingredient), respectively. The UHPLC method was linear in the range 0.1-10μg/ml for all analytes except three impurities for which the linear range was larger 0.1-25μg/ml. Method accuracy ≥95.7% and ≥95.2% and method intra-day precision RSD ≤2.6 and ≤1.5 were found for impurities and API, respectively. The measurement of tablet samples was performed and the selected parameters of the methods were compared. In conclusion, both methods were appropriate for the determination of agomelatine and its impurities in pharmaceutical quality control (QC), although the UHPSFC method was found as more convenient especially in the method development phase. The advantages of newly developed UHPSFC-PDA (photo diode array detector) method were its environmental friendliness due to the mobile phase used, a very good resolution, selectivity and high speed of analysis (total time of separation was 4.1min).
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17024027
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170828133042.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170720s2016 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jpba.2016.04.020 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27131147
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Plachká, Kateřina $u Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University in Prague, Heyrovského 1203, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Development, validation and comparison of UHPSFC and UHPLC methods for the determination of agomelatine and its impurities / $c K. Plachká, L. Chrenková, M. Douša, L. Nováková,
- 520 9_
- $a Agomelatine is one of the newest antidepressants. Due to a different mechanism of action it offers a completely new approach in the treatment of depressive disorders. Two chromatographic methods for determination of agomelatine and its impurities were developed. The separations on UHPSFC system were accomplished using stationary phase based on BEH 2-EP and gradient elution with CO2 and methanol containing 20mM ammonium formate and 5% of water. The UHPLC separations were performed on stationary phase BEH Shield RP18. The mixture of acetonitrile and methanol in ratio 1:1 and ammonium acetate buffer pH 9.5 were used as mobile phase. Both developed methods were properly validated in terms of linearity, sensitivity (LOD, LOQ), accuracy and precision according to ICH guidelines. The UHPSFC method was linear in the range 0.25-70μg/ml for all analytes with method accuracy ≥97.4% and ≥100.2% and method intra-day precision RSD ≤2.4 and ≤0.8 for impurities and API (active pharmaceutical ingredient), respectively. The UHPLC method was linear in the range 0.1-10μg/ml for all analytes except three impurities for which the linear range was larger 0.1-25μg/ml. Method accuracy ≥95.7% and ≥95.2% and method intra-day precision RSD ≤2.6 and ≤1.5 were found for impurities and API, respectively. The measurement of tablet samples was performed and the selected parameters of the methods were compared. In conclusion, both methods were appropriate for the determination of agomelatine and its impurities in pharmaceutical quality control (QC), although the UHPSFC method was found as more convenient especially in the method development phase. The advantages of newly developed UHPSFC-PDA (photo diode array detector) method were its environmental friendliness due to the mobile phase used, a very good resolution, selectivity and high speed of analysis (total time of separation was 4.1min).
- 650 _2
- $a acetamidy $x analýza $7 D000081
- 650 _2
- $a vysokoúčinná kapalinová chromatografie $x metody $7 D002851
- 650 _2
- $a koncentrace vodíkových iontů $7 D006863
- 650 _2
- $a referenční standardy $7 D012015
- 650 _2
- $a tablety $7 D013607
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a validační studie $7 D023361
- 700 1_
- $a Chrenková, Lucia $u Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University in Prague, Heyrovského 1203, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Douša, Michal $u Zentiva, k.s. Praha, a Sanofi Company, U Kabelovny 130, 102 37 Praha 10, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Nováková, Lucie $u Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University in Prague, Heyrovského 1203, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. Electronic address: nol@email.cz.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002894 $t Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis $x 1873-264X $g Roč. 125, č. - (2016), s. 376-84
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27131147 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170828133628 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1239708 $s 984940
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 125 $c - $d 376-84 $e 20160419 $i 1873-264X $m Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis $n J Pharm Biomed Anal $x MED00002894
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170720