• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Development, validation and comparison of UHPSFC and UHPLC methods for the determination of agomelatine and its impurities

K. Plachká, L. Chrenková, M. Douša, L. Nováková,

. 2016 ; 125 (-) : 376-84. [pub] 20160419

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, validační studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17024027

Agomelatine is one of the newest antidepressants. Due to a different mechanism of action it offers a completely new approach in the treatment of depressive disorders. Two chromatographic methods for determination of agomelatine and its impurities were developed. The separations on UHPSFC system were accomplished using stationary phase based on BEH 2-EP and gradient elution with CO2 and methanol containing 20mM ammonium formate and 5% of water. The UHPLC separations were performed on stationary phase BEH Shield RP18. The mixture of acetonitrile and methanol in ratio 1:1 and ammonium acetate buffer pH 9.5 were used as mobile phase. Both developed methods were properly validated in terms of linearity, sensitivity (LOD, LOQ), accuracy and precision according to ICH guidelines. The UHPSFC method was linear in the range 0.25-70μg/ml for all analytes with method accuracy ≥97.4% and ≥100.2% and method intra-day precision RSD ≤2.4 and ≤0.8 for impurities and API (active pharmaceutical ingredient), respectively. The UHPLC method was linear in the range 0.1-10μg/ml for all analytes except three impurities for which the linear range was larger 0.1-25μg/ml. Method accuracy ≥95.7% and ≥95.2% and method intra-day precision RSD ≤2.6 and ≤1.5 were found for impurities and API, respectively. The measurement of tablet samples was performed and the selected parameters of the methods were compared. In conclusion, both methods were appropriate for the determination of agomelatine and its impurities in pharmaceutical quality control (QC), although the UHPSFC method was found as more convenient especially in the method development phase. The advantages of newly developed UHPSFC-PDA (photo diode array detector) method were its environmental friendliness due to the mobile phase used, a very good resolution, selectivity and high speed of analysis (total time of separation was 4.1min).

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17024027
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170828133042.0
007      
ta
008      
170720s2016 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jpba.2016.04.020 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27131147
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Plachká, Kateřina $u Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University in Prague, Heyrovského 1203, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Development, validation and comparison of UHPSFC and UHPLC methods for the determination of agomelatine and its impurities / $c K. Plachká, L. Chrenková, M. Douša, L. Nováková,
520    9_
$a Agomelatine is one of the newest antidepressants. Due to a different mechanism of action it offers a completely new approach in the treatment of depressive disorders. Two chromatographic methods for determination of agomelatine and its impurities were developed. The separations on UHPSFC system were accomplished using stationary phase based on BEH 2-EP and gradient elution with CO2 and methanol containing 20mM ammonium formate and 5% of water. The UHPLC separations were performed on stationary phase BEH Shield RP18. The mixture of acetonitrile and methanol in ratio 1:1 and ammonium acetate buffer pH 9.5 were used as mobile phase. Both developed methods were properly validated in terms of linearity, sensitivity (LOD, LOQ), accuracy and precision according to ICH guidelines. The UHPSFC method was linear in the range 0.25-70μg/ml for all analytes with method accuracy ≥97.4% and ≥100.2% and method intra-day precision RSD ≤2.4 and ≤0.8 for impurities and API (active pharmaceutical ingredient), respectively. The UHPLC method was linear in the range 0.1-10μg/ml for all analytes except three impurities for which the linear range was larger 0.1-25μg/ml. Method accuracy ≥95.7% and ≥95.2% and method intra-day precision RSD ≤2.6 and ≤1.5 were found for impurities and API, respectively. The measurement of tablet samples was performed and the selected parameters of the methods were compared. In conclusion, both methods were appropriate for the determination of agomelatine and its impurities in pharmaceutical quality control (QC), although the UHPSFC method was found as more convenient especially in the method development phase. The advantages of newly developed UHPSFC-PDA (photo diode array detector) method were its environmental friendliness due to the mobile phase used, a very good resolution, selectivity and high speed of analysis (total time of separation was 4.1min).
650    _2
$a acetamidy $x analýza $7 D000081
650    _2
$a vysokoúčinná kapalinová chromatografie $x metody $7 D002851
650    _2
$a koncentrace vodíkových iontů $7 D006863
650    _2
$a referenční standardy $7 D012015
650    _2
$a tablety $7 D013607
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a validační studie $7 D023361
700    1_
$a Chrenková, Lucia $u Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University in Prague, Heyrovského 1203, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Douša, Michal $u Zentiva, k.s. Praha, a Sanofi Company, U Kabelovny 130, 102 37 Praha 10, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Nováková, Lucie $u Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University in Prague, Heyrovského 1203, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. Electronic address: nol@email.cz.
773    0_
$w MED00002894 $t Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis $x 1873-264X $g Roč. 125, č. - (2016), s. 376-84
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27131147 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20170720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170828133628 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1239708 $s 984940
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 125 $c - $d 376-84 $e 20160419 $i 1873-264X $m Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis $n J Pharm Biomed Anal $x MED00002894
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20170720

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...