• Something wrong with this record ?

Pelvic floor dysfunction after vaginal and cesarean delivery among singleton primiparas

M. Huser, P. Janku, R. Hudecek, Z. Zbozinkova, M. Bursa, V. Unzeitig, P. Ventruba,

. 2017 ; 137 (2) : 170-173. [pub] 20170301

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Observational Study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms, including pelvic organ prolapse (POP), urinary incontinence (UI), and fecal incontinence (FI) among primiparous women after vaginal and cesarean delivery. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study at a University hospital in the Czech Republic, singleton primiparas with cephalic presentation who delivered at term were enrolled between 2002 and 2007. In 2013, 5-10 years after delivery, women who had not delivered again completed an internet-based survey about current symptoms of POP, UI, and FI, which were evaluated using validated questionnaires. The relative risk (RR) of POP, UI, and FI symptoms was calculated. RESULTS: Complete questionnaire data were obtained from 641 women who delivered vaginally and 224 who delivered by cesarean. The mean UI score (ICIQ-SF) was 2.3 ± 3.6 in the vaginal group and 1.0 ± 2.7 in the cesarean group (P=0.005). The mean POP scores (POPDI-6) were 2.2 ± 2.3 and 2.1 ± 2.0, respectively (P=0.944). The mean Wexner scores to evaluate FI were 1.3 ± 1.7 and 1.0 ± 1.5, respectively (P=0.220). The RR of pelvic floor dysfunction after vaginal delivery was highest for women with UI symptoms (RR 1.15, 95% confidence interval 0.92-1.42). CONCLUSION: Significant differences in the occurrence of symptoms of UI were observed after vaginal delivery as compared with cesarean delivery. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02661867.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17031061
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20171103112710.0
007      
ta
008      
171025s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/ijgo.12116 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28171703
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Huser, Martin $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brno University Hospital and Masaryk University Medical School, Brno, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Pelvic floor dysfunction after vaginal and cesarean delivery among singleton primiparas / $c M. Huser, P. Janku, R. Hudecek, Z. Zbozinkova, M. Bursa, V. Unzeitig, P. Ventruba,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms, including pelvic organ prolapse (POP), urinary incontinence (UI), and fecal incontinence (FI) among primiparous women after vaginal and cesarean delivery. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study at a University hospital in the Czech Republic, singleton primiparas with cephalic presentation who delivered at term were enrolled between 2002 and 2007. In 2013, 5-10 years after delivery, women who had not delivered again completed an internet-based survey about current symptoms of POP, UI, and FI, which were evaluated using validated questionnaires. The relative risk (RR) of POP, UI, and FI symptoms was calculated. RESULTS: Complete questionnaire data were obtained from 641 women who delivered vaginally and 224 who delivered by cesarean. The mean UI score (ICIQ-SF) was 2.3 ± 3.6 in the vaginal group and 1.0 ± 2.7 in the cesarean group (P=0.005). The mean POP scores (POPDI-6) were 2.2 ± 2.3 and 2.1 ± 2.0, respectively (P=0.944). The mean Wexner scores to evaluate FI were 1.3 ± 1.7 and 1.0 ± 1.5, respectively (P=0.220). The RR of pelvic floor dysfunction after vaginal delivery was highest for women with UI symptoms (RR 1.15, 95% confidence interval 0.92-1.42). CONCLUSION: Significant differences in the occurrence of symptoms of UI were observed after vaginal delivery as compared with cesarean delivery. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02661867.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a císařský řez $x škodlivé účinky $7 D002585
650    _2
$a Česká republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018153
650    _2
$a vedení porodu $x škodlivé účinky $7 D036861
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a internet $7 D020407
650    12
$a parita $7 D010298
650    _2
$a onemocnění dna pánevního $x epidemiologie $x etiologie $7 D059952
650    _2
$a prolaps pánevních orgánů $x epidemiologie $x etiologie $7 D056887
650    _2
$a těhotenství $7 D011247
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a poruchy v puerperiu $x epidemiologie $7 D011644
650    _2
$a stupeň závažnosti nemoci $7 D012720
650    _2
$a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
650    _2
$a zdraví žen $7 D016387
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
700    1_
$a Janku, Petr $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brno University Hospital and Masaryk University Medical School, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hudecek, Robert $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brno University Hospital and Masaryk University Medical School, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Zbozinkova, Zuzana $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University Medical School, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Bursa, Miroslav $u Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics and Cybernetics, Czech Technical University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Unzeitig, Vit $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ostrava and University of Ostrava Medical School, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Ventruba, Pavel $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brno University Hospital and Masaryk University Medical School, Brno, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00009895 $t International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics $x 1879-3479 $g Roč. 137, č. 2 (2017), s. 170-173
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28171703 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20171025 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20171103112804 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1254654 $s 992088
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 137 $c 2 $d 170-173 $e 20170301 $i 1879-3479 $m International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics $n Int J Gynaecol Obstet $x MED00009895
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20171025

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...