• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Highly Efficient Training, Refinement, and Validation of a Knowledge-based Planning Quality-Control System for Radiation Therapy Clinical Trials

N. Li, R. Carmona, I. Sirak, L. Kasaova, D. Followill, J. Michalski, W. Bosch, W. Straube, LK. Mell, KL. Moore,

. 2017 ; 97 (1) : 164-172. [pub] 20161013

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, validační studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17031218

PURPOSE: To demonstrate an efficient method for training and validation of a knowledge-based planning (KBP) system as a radiation therapy clinical trial plan quality-control system. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed 86 patients with stage IB through IVA cervical cancer treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy at 2 institutions according to the standards of the INTERTECC (International Evaluation of Radiotherapy Technology Effectiveness in Cervical Cancer, National Clinical Trials Network identifier: 01554397) protocol. The protocol used a planning target volume and 2 primary organs at risk: pelvic bone marrow (PBM) and bowel. Secondary organs at risk were rectum and bladder. Initial unfiltered dose-volume histogram (DVH) estimation models were trained using all 86 plans. Refined training sets were created by removing sub-optimal plans from the unfiltered sample, and DVH estimation models… and DVH estimation models were constructed by identifying 30 of 86 plans emphasizing PBM sparing (comparing protocol-specified dosimetric cutpoints V10 (percentage volume of PBM receiving at least 10 Gy dose) and V20 (percentage volume of PBM receiving at least 20 Gy dose) with unfiltered predictions) and another 30 of 86 plans emphasizing bowel sparing (comparing V40 (absolute volume of bowel receiving at least 40 Gy dose) and V45 (absolute volume of bowel receiving at least 45 Gy dose), 9 in common with the PBM set). To obtain deliverable KBP plans, refined models must inform patient-specific optimization objectives and/or priorities (an auto-planning "routine"). Four candidate routines emphasizing different tradeoffs were composed, and a script was developed to automatically re-plan multiple patients with each routine. After selection of the routine that best met protocol objectives in the 51-patient training sample (KBPFINAL), protocol-specific DVH metrics and normal tissue complication probability were compared for original versus KBPFINAL plans across the 35-patient validation set. Paired t tests were used to test differences between planning sets. RESULTS: KBPFINAL plans outperformed manual planning across the validation set in all protocol-specific DVH cutpoints. The mean normal tissue complication probability for gastrointestinal toxicity was lower for KBPFINAL versus validation-set plans (48.7% vs 53.8%, P<.001). Similarly, the estimated mean white blood cell count nadir was higher (2.77 vs 2.49 k/mL, P<.001) with KBPFINAL plans, indicating lowered probability of hematologic toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates that a KBP system can be efficiently trained and refined for use in radiation therapy clinical trials with minimal effort. This patient-specific plan quality control resulted in improvements on protocol-specific dosimetric endpoints.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17031218
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20171030131654.0
007      
ta
008      
171025s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.10.005 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27979445
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Li, Nan $u Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
245    10
$a Highly Efficient Training, Refinement, and Validation of a Knowledge-based Planning Quality-Control System for Radiation Therapy Clinical Trials / $c N. Li, R. Carmona, I. Sirak, L. Kasaova, D. Followill, J. Michalski, W. Bosch, W. Straube, LK. Mell, KL. Moore,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: To demonstrate an efficient method for training and validation of a knowledge-based planning (KBP) system as a radiation therapy clinical trial plan quality-control system. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed 86 patients with stage IB through IVA cervical cancer treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy at 2 institutions according to the standards of the INTERTECC (International Evaluation of Radiotherapy Technology Effectiveness in Cervical Cancer, National Clinical Trials Network identifier: 01554397) protocol. The protocol used a planning target volume and 2 primary organs at risk: pelvic bone marrow (PBM) and bowel. Secondary organs at risk were rectum and bladder. Initial unfiltered dose-volume histogram (DVH) estimation models were trained using all 86 plans. Refined training sets were created by removing sub-optimal plans from the unfiltered sample, and DVH estimation models… and DVH estimation models were constructed by identifying 30 of 86 plans emphasizing PBM sparing (comparing protocol-specified dosimetric cutpoints V10 (percentage volume of PBM receiving at least 10 Gy dose) and V20 (percentage volume of PBM receiving at least 20 Gy dose) with unfiltered predictions) and another 30 of 86 plans emphasizing bowel sparing (comparing V40 (absolute volume of bowel receiving at least 40 Gy dose) and V45 (absolute volume of bowel receiving at least 45 Gy dose), 9 in common with the PBM set). To obtain deliverable KBP plans, refined models must inform patient-specific optimization objectives and/or priorities (an auto-planning "routine"). Four candidate routines emphasizing different tradeoffs were composed, and a script was developed to automatically re-plan multiple patients with each routine. After selection of the routine that best met protocol objectives in the 51-patient training sample (KBPFINAL), protocol-specific DVH metrics and normal tissue complication probability were compared for original versus KBPFINAL plans across the 35-patient validation set. Paired t tests were used to test differences between planning sets. RESULTS: KBPFINAL plans outperformed manual planning across the validation set in all protocol-specific DVH cutpoints. The mean normal tissue complication probability for gastrointestinal toxicity was lower for KBPFINAL versus validation-set plans (48.7% vs 53.8%, P<.001). Similarly, the estimated mean white blood cell count nadir was higher (2.77 vs 2.49 k/mL, P<.001) with KBPFINAL plans, indicating lowered probability of hematologic toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates that a KBP system can be efficiently trained and refined for use in radiation therapy clinical trials with minimal effort. This patient-specific plan quality control resulted in improvements on protocol-specific dosimetric endpoints.
650    _2
$a kostní dřeň $7 D001853
650    _2
$a klinické zkoušky jako téma $x normy $7 D002986
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a střeva $7 D007422
650    _2
$a léčba šetřící orgány $x metody $x normy $7 D059351
650    12
$a kritické orgány $7 D058958
650    _2
$a pánevní kosti $7 D010384
650    12
$a řízení kvality $7 D011786
650    _2
$a plánování radioterapie pomocí počítače $x metody $x normy $7 D011880
650    _2
$a radioterapie s modulovanou intenzitou $x metody $x normy $7 D050397
650    _2
$a rektum $7 D012007
650    _2
$a tumor burden $7 D047368
650    _2
$a močový měchýř $7 D001743
650    _2
$a nádory děložního čípku $x patologie $x radioterapie $7 D002583
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a validační studie $7 D023361
700    1_
$a Carmona, Ruben $u Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
700    1_
$a Sirak, Igor $u Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kasaova, Linda $u Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Followill, David $u Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
700    1_
$a Michalski, Jeff $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
700    1_
$a Bosch, Walter $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
700    1_
$a Straube, William $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
700    1_
$a Mell, Loren K $u Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
700    1_
$a Moore, Kevin L $u Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California. Electronic address: kevinmoore@ucsd.edu.
773    0_
$w MED00002371 $t International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics $x 1879-355X $g Roč. 97, č. 1 (2017), s. 164-172
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27979445 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20171025 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20171030131743 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1254811 $s 992245
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 97 $c 1 $d 164-172 $e 20161013 $i 1879-355X $m International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics $n Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys $x MED00002371
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20171025

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...