Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Pre-Microporation Improves Outcome of Pancreatic Islet Labelling for Optical and (19)F MR Imaging

V. Herynek, A. Gálisová, M. Srinivas, EAW. van Dinther, L. Kosinová, J. Ruzicka, M. Jirátová, J. Kriz, D. Jirák,

. 2017 ; 19 (-) : 6. [pub] 20170628

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17032071

BACKGROUND: In vitro labelling of cells and small cell structures is a necessary step before in vivo monitoring of grafts. We modified and optimised a procedure for pancreatic islet labelling using bimodal positively charged poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles with encapsulated perfluoro crown ethers and indocyanine green dye via microporation and compared the method with passive endocytosis. RESULTS: Pancreatic islets were microporated using two pulses at various voltages. We tested a standard procedure (poration in the presence of nanoparticles) and a modified protocol (pre-microporation in a buffer only, and subsequent islet incubation with nanoparticles on ice for 10 min). We compared islet labelling by microporation with labelling by endocytosis, i.e. pancreatic islets were incubated for 24 h in a medium with suspended nanoparticles. In order to verify the efficiency of the labelling procedures, we used (19)F magnetic resonance imaging, optical fluorescence imaging and confocal microscopy. The experiment confirmed that microporation, albeit fast and effective, is invasive and may cause substantial harm to islets. To achieve sufficient poration and to minimise the reduction of viability, the electric field should be set at 20 kV/m (two pulses, 20 ms each). Poration in the presence of nanoparticles was found to be unsuitable for the nanoparticles used. The water suspension of nanoparticles (which served as a surfactant) was slightly foamy and microbubbles in the suspension were responsible for sparks causing the destruction of islets during poration. However, pre-microporation (poration of islets in a buffer only) followed by 10-min incubation with nanoparticles was safer. CONCLUSIONS: For labelling of pancreatic islets using poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles, the modified microporation procedure with low voltage was found to be safer than the standard microporation procedure. The modified procedure was fast, however, efficiency was lower compared to endocytosis.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17032071
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210223143304.0
007      
ta
008      
171025s2017 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12575-017-0055-4 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28674481
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Herynek, Vít $u MR Unit, Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Vídeňská 1958/9, Prague, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Pre-Microporation Improves Outcome of Pancreatic Islet Labelling for Optical and (19)F MR Imaging / $c V. Herynek, A. Gálisová, M. Srinivas, EAW. van Dinther, L. Kosinová, J. Ruzicka, M. Jirátová, J. Kriz, D. Jirák,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: In vitro labelling of cells and small cell structures is a necessary step before in vivo monitoring of grafts. We modified and optimised a procedure for pancreatic islet labelling using bimodal positively charged poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles with encapsulated perfluoro crown ethers and indocyanine green dye via microporation and compared the method with passive endocytosis. RESULTS: Pancreatic islets were microporated using two pulses at various voltages. We tested a standard procedure (poration in the presence of nanoparticles) and a modified protocol (pre-microporation in a buffer only, and subsequent islet incubation with nanoparticles on ice for 10 min). We compared islet labelling by microporation with labelling by endocytosis, i.e. pancreatic islets were incubated for 24 h in a medium with suspended nanoparticles. In order to verify the efficiency of the labelling procedures, we used (19)F magnetic resonance imaging, optical fluorescence imaging and confocal microscopy. The experiment confirmed that microporation, albeit fast and effective, is invasive and may cause substantial harm to islets. To achieve sufficient poration and to minimise the reduction of viability, the electric field should be set at 20 kV/m (two pulses, 20 ms each). Poration in the presence of nanoparticles was found to be unsuitable for the nanoparticles used. The water suspension of nanoparticles (which served as a surfactant) was slightly foamy and microbubbles in the suspension were responsible for sparks causing the destruction of islets during poration. However, pre-microporation (poration of islets in a buffer only) followed by 10-min incubation with nanoparticles was safer. CONCLUSIONS: For labelling of pancreatic islets using poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles, the modified microporation procedure with low voltage was found to be safer than the standard microporation procedure. The modified procedure was fast, however, efficiency was lower compared to endocytosis.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Gálisová, Andrea $u MR Unit, Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Vídeňská 1958/9, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Srinivas, Mangala $u Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Route 278, Geert Grooteplein 28, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
700    1_
$a van Dinther, Eric A W $u Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Route 278, Geert Grooteplein 28, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Kosinová, Lucie $u Centre of Experimental Medicine, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Vídeňská 1958/9, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Ruzicka, Jiri $u MR Unit, Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Vídeňská 1958/9, Prague, Czech Republic. Department of Tissue Culture and Stem Cells, Institute of Experimental Medicine AS CR, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Jirátová, Markéta $u MR Unit, Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Vídeňská 1958/9, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kriz, Jan $u Diabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Vídeňská 1958/9, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Jirák, Daniel $u MR Unit, Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Vídeňská 1958/9, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00006681 $t Biological procedures online $x 1480-9222 $g Roč. 19, č. - (2017), s. 6
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28674481 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20171025 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210223143301 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1255664 $s 993098
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 19 $c - $d 6 $e 20170628 $i 1480-9222 $m Biological procedures online $n Biol Proced Online $x MED00006681
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20171025

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace