• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Utility and Actual Use of European and Spanish Guidelines on the Management of Endometrial Cancer Among Gynecologic Oncologists in Spain

I. Zapardiel, C. Blancafort, D. Cibula, I. Jaunarena, M. Gorostidi, A. Gil-Moreno, J. De Santiago, . ,

. 2017 ; 27 (6) : 1293-1297.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18010499

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyze the current management of endometrial cancer across Spain and to evaluate the use and applicability of the national and international guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic 30-question survey was distributed among all Spanish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology-registered specialists dedicated to gynecologic oncology in Spain by e-mail. Data were collected anonymously and analyzed using SPSS program. RESULTS: One hundred forty-five (17.8%) surveys were collected. Significant differences were observed between tertiary hospitals and secondary or private hospitals in terms of appropriate (according to European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology guidelines) nodal staging in low-risk cases (96 [95%] vs 27 [61.4%], respectively; P < 0.001), appropriate nodal staging in intermediate-risk cases (96 [95%] vs 39 [88.6%], respectively; P = 0.004), appropriate treatment in advanced-stage cases (63 [67.7%] vs 13 [40.6%], respectively; P < 0.001), and surgical treatment of relapses (87 [93.5%] vs 18 [56.3%], respectively; P = 0.004) but nonsignificant in the rate of complete paraaortic lymphadenectomy performance (82 [81.2%] vs 28 [63.6%], respectively; P = 0.056). Similar results have been observed when comparing centers with less than 20 cases per year to centers with more than 40 cases annually, with significant differences in the management of low-risk and intermediate-risk endometrial cancers. CONCLUSIONS: This cross-sectional study demonstrates a broad heterogeneity of care giving between the clinical national and international guidelines and the actual practice in Spain. Although most of the responders refer to base their endometrial cancer management on Spanish and European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology guidelines (64.1%), many discrepancies have been observed, mainly in the management of intermediate-risk cases and follow-up. It may be caused by the lack of consensus on certain points, lack of facilities in lower case load centers, and also due to disagreement or unawareness on the current knowledge.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18010499
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180404142054.0
007      
ta
008      
180404s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001017 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28604452
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Zapardiel, Ignacio $u *Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital, IdiPAZ, Madrid; †Gynecology Department, Dexeus University Institute, Barcelona, Spain; ‡Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic; §Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastian; ∥Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Materno-infantil Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona; and ¶Department of Gynecology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain.
245    10
$a Utility and Actual Use of European and Spanish Guidelines on the Management of Endometrial Cancer Among Gynecologic Oncologists in Spain / $c I. Zapardiel, C. Blancafort, D. Cibula, I. Jaunarena, M. Gorostidi, A. Gil-Moreno, J. De Santiago, . ,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyze the current management of endometrial cancer across Spain and to evaluate the use and applicability of the national and international guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic 30-question survey was distributed among all Spanish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology-registered specialists dedicated to gynecologic oncology in Spain by e-mail. Data were collected anonymously and analyzed using SPSS program. RESULTS: One hundred forty-five (17.8%) surveys were collected. Significant differences were observed between tertiary hospitals and secondary or private hospitals in terms of appropriate (according to European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology guidelines) nodal staging in low-risk cases (96 [95%] vs 27 [61.4%], respectively; P < 0.001), appropriate nodal staging in intermediate-risk cases (96 [95%] vs 39 [88.6%], respectively; P = 0.004), appropriate treatment in advanced-stage cases (63 [67.7%] vs 13 [40.6%], respectively; P < 0.001), and surgical treatment of relapses (87 [93.5%] vs 18 [56.3%], respectively; P = 0.004) but nonsignificant in the rate of complete paraaortic lymphadenectomy performance (82 [81.2%] vs 28 [63.6%], respectively; P = 0.056). Similar results have been observed when comparing centers with less than 20 cases per year to centers with more than 40 cases annually, with significant differences in the management of low-risk and intermediate-risk endometrial cancers. CONCLUSIONS: This cross-sectional study demonstrates a broad heterogeneity of care giving between the clinical national and international guidelines and the actual practice in Spain. Although most of the responders refer to base their endometrial cancer management on Spanish and European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology guidelines (64.1%), many discrepancies have been observed, mainly in the management of intermediate-risk cases and follow-up. It may be caused by the lack of consensus on certain points, lack of facilities in lower case load centers, and also due to disagreement or unawareness on the current knowledge.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    _2
$a nádory endometria $x diagnóza $x terapie $7 D016889
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a dodržování směrnic $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D019983
650    _2
$a gynekologie $x metody $x normy $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D006176
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a lékařská onkologie $x metody $x normy $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D008495
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma $7 D017410
650    _2
$a lékařská praxe - způsoby provádění $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D010818
650    _2
$a Španělsko $7 D013030
650    _2
$a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Blancafort, Claudia
700    1_
$a Cibula, David
700    1_
$a Jaunarena, Ibon
700    1_
$a Gorostidi, Mikel
700    1_
$a Gil-Moreno, Antonio
700    1_
$a De Santiago, Javier
700    1_
$a ,
773    0_
$w MED00009896 $t International journal of gynecological cancer official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society $x 1525-1438 $g Roč. 27, č. 6 (2017), s. 1293-1297
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28604452 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180404 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180404142134 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1287984 $s 1007311
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 27 $c 6 $d 1293-1297 $i 1525-1438 $m International journal of gynecological cancer $n Int J Gynecol Cancer $x MED00009896
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180404

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace