• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Exposure-Response Analyses of Asbestos and Lung Cancer Subtypes in a Pooled Analysis of Case-Control Studies

AC. Olsson, R. Vermeulen, J. Schüz, H. Kromhout, B. Pesch, S. Peters, T. Behrens, L. Portengen, D. Mirabelli, P. Gustavsson, B. Kendzia, J. Almansa, V. Luzon, J. Vlaanderen, I. Stücker, F. Guida, D. Consonni, N. Caporaso, MT. Landi, J. Field, I....

. 2017 ; 28 (2) : 288-299.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18010829

BACKGROUND: Evidence is limited regarding risk and the shape of the exposure-response curve at low asbestos exposure levels. We estimated the exposure-response for occupational asbestos exposure and assessed the joint effect of asbestos exposure and smoking by sex and lung cancer subtype in general population studies. METHODS: We pooled 14 case-control studies conducted in 1985-2010 in Europe and Canada, including 17,705 lung cancer cases and 21,813 controls with detailed information on tobacco habits and lifetime occupations. We developed a quantitative job-exposure-matrix to estimate job-, time period-, and region-specific exposure levels. Fiber-years (ff/ml-years) were calculated for each subject by linking the matrix with individual occupational histories. We fit unconditional logistic regression models to estimate odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and trends. RESULTS: The fully adjusted OR for ever-exposure to asbestos was 1.24 (95% CI, 1.18, 1.31) in men and 1.12 (95% CI, 0.95, 1.31) in women. In men, increasing lung cancer risk was observed with increasing exposure in all smoking categories and for all three major lung cancer subtypes. In women, lung cancer risk for all subtypes was increased in current smokers (ORs ~two-fold). The joint effect of asbestos exposure and smoking did not deviate from multiplicativity among men, and was more than additive among women. CONCLUSIONS: Our results in men showed an excess risk of lung cancer and its subtypes at low cumulative exposure levels, with a steeper exposure-response slope in this exposure range than at higher, previously studied levels. (See video abstract at, http://links.lww.com/EDE/B161.).

bbFaculty of Medicine Palacky University Olomouc Czech Republic

bThe Institute of Environmental Medicine Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden

ccThe Tisch Cancer Institute and Institute for Translational Epidemiology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY

cInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences Utrecht The Netherlands

eeDepartment of Epidemiology ASL RomaE Rome Italy

eOccupational Respiratory Epidemiology School of Population Health University of Western Australia Perth Australia

fCancer Epidemiology Unit Department of Medical Sciences University of Turin and CPO Piemonte Turin Italy

From the aInternational Agency for Research on Cancer Lyon France

gINSERM Centre for research in Epidemiology and Population Health U1018 Environmental epidemiology of cancer Team Villejuif France

hUniversité Paris Sud UMRS 1018 Villejuif France

iEpidemiology Unit Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan Italy

INRS Institut Armand Frappier Université du Québec Laval Québec Canada

Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance Institute of the Ruhr Universität Bochum Bochum Germany

jNational Cancer Institute Bethesda MD

kRoy Castle Lung Cancer Research Programme The University of Liverpool Cancer Research Centre Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine Institute of Translational Medicine Liverpool United Kingdom

lInstitut für Epidemiologie Deutsches Forschungszentrum fur Gesundheit und Umwelt Neuherberg Germany

Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute and Medical Faculty of Masaryk University Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics Brno Czech Republic

mUniversity of Montreal Hospital Research Center Montreal Canada

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment Bilthoven The Netherlands

oInstitute for Medical Informatics Biometry and Epidemiology University of Duisburg Essen Essen Germany

pLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology BIPS Bremen Germany

qThe Biomedical Research Centre Network for Epidemiology and Public Health University of Oviedo Oviedo Spain

rRussian Cancer Research Centre Moscow Russia

sPublic Health Ontario Toronto Canada

tOccupational Cancer Research Centre Cancer Care Ontario Toronto Canada

uThe Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine Lodz Poland

vThe M Sklodowska Curie Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology Warsaw Poland

wNational Centre for Public Health Budapest Hungary

xRegional Authority of Public Health Banska Bystrica Slovakia

yInstitute of Public Health Bucharest Romania

zInstitute of Hygiene and Epidemiology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18010829
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180418140231.0
007      
ta
008      
180404s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000604 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28141674
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Olsson, Ann C $u From the aInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; bThe Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; cInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands; dInstitute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance - Institute of the Ruhr-Universität Bochum (IPA), Bochum, Germany; eOccupational Respiratory Epidemiology, School of Population Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; fCancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin and CPO Piemonte, Turin, Italy; gINSERM, Centre for research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), U1018, Environmental epidemiology of cancer Team, Villejuif, France; hUniversité Paris-Sud, UMRS 1018, Villejuif, France; iEpidemiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; jNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; kRoy Castle Lung Cancer Research Programme, The University of Liverpool Cancer Research Centre, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom; lInstitut für Epidemiologie, Deutsches Forschungszentrum fur Gesundheit und Umwelt, Neuherberg, Germany; mUniversity of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada; nINRS-Institut Armand-Frappier, Université du Québec, Laval, Québec, Canada; oInstitute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; pLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany; qThe Biomedical Research Centre Network for Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain; rRussian Cancer Research Centre, Moscow, Russia; sPublic Health Ontario, Toronto, Canada; tOccupational Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada; uThe Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, Poland; vThe M Sklodowska-Curie Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland; wNational Centre for Public Health, Budapest, Hungary; xRegional Authority of Public Health, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia; yInstitute of Public Health, Bucharest, Romania; zInstitute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; aaMasaryk Memorial Cancer Institute and Medical Faculty of Masaryk University, Department of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, Brno, Czech Republic; bbFaculty of Medicine, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic; ccThe Tisch Cancer Institute and Institute for Translational Epidemiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; ddNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands; and eeDepartment of Epidemiology, ASL RomaE, Rome, Italy.
245    10
$a Exposure-Response Analyses of Asbestos and Lung Cancer Subtypes in a Pooled Analysis of Case-Control Studies / $c AC. Olsson, R. Vermeulen, J. Schüz, H. Kromhout, B. Pesch, S. Peters, T. Behrens, L. Portengen, D. Mirabelli, P. Gustavsson, B. Kendzia, J. Almansa, V. Luzon, J. Vlaanderen, I. Stücker, F. Guida, D. Consonni, N. Caporaso, MT. Landi, J. Field, I. Brüske, HE. Wichmann, J. Siemiatycki, ME. Parent, L. Richiardi, F. Merletti, KH. Jöckel, W. Ahrens, H. Pohlabeln, N. Plato, A. Tardón, D. Zaridze, J. McLaughlin, P. Demers, N. Szeszenia-Dabrowska, J. Lissowska, P. Rudnai, E. Fabianova, R. Stanescu Dumitru, V. Bencko, L. Foretova, V. Janout, P. Boffetta, B. Bueno-de-Mesquita, F. Forastiere, T. Brüning, K. Straif,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Evidence is limited regarding risk and the shape of the exposure-response curve at low asbestos exposure levels. We estimated the exposure-response for occupational asbestos exposure and assessed the joint effect of asbestos exposure and smoking by sex and lung cancer subtype in general population studies. METHODS: We pooled 14 case-control studies conducted in 1985-2010 in Europe and Canada, including 17,705 lung cancer cases and 21,813 controls with detailed information on tobacco habits and lifetime occupations. We developed a quantitative job-exposure-matrix to estimate job-, time period-, and region-specific exposure levels. Fiber-years (ff/ml-years) were calculated for each subject by linking the matrix with individual occupational histories. We fit unconditional logistic regression models to estimate odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and trends. RESULTS: The fully adjusted OR for ever-exposure to asbestos was 1.24 (95% CI, 1.18, 1.31) in men and 1.12 (95% CI, 0.95, 1.31) in women. In men, increasing lung cancer risk was observed with increasing exposure in all smoking categories and for all three major lung cancer subtypes. In women, lung cancer risk for all subtypes was increased in current smokers (ORs ~two-fold). The joint effect of asbestos exposure and smoking did not deviate from multiplicativity among men, and was more than additive among women. CONCLUSIONS: Our results in men showed an excess risk of lung cancer and its subtypes at low cumulative exposure levels, with a steeper exposure-response slope in this exposure range than at higher, previously studied levels. (See video abstract at, http://links.lww.com/EDE/B161.).
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    12
$a azbest $7 D001194
650    _2
$a Kanada $x epidemiologie $7 D002170
650    _2
$a spinocelulární karcinom $x epidemiologie $7 D002294
650    _2
$a studie případů a kontrol $7 D016022
650    _2
$a Evropa $x epidemiologie $7 D005060
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a logistické modely $7 D016015
650    _2
$a nádory plic $x epidemiologie $7 D008175
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a pracovní expozice $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D016273
650    _2
$a odds ratio $7 D016017
650    _2
$a malobuněčný karcinom plic $x epidemiologie $7 D055752
650    _2
$a kouření $x epidemiologie $7 D012907
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Vermeulen, Roel
700    1_
$a Schüz, Joachim
700    1_
$a Kromhout, Hans
700    1_
$a Pesch, Beate
700    1_
$a Peters, Susan
700    1_
$a Behrens, Thomas
700    1_
$a Portengen, Lützen
700    1_
$a Mirabelli, Dario
700    1_
$a Gustavsson, Per
700    1_
$a Kendzia, Benjamin
700    1_
$a Almansa, Josue
700    1_
$a Luzon, Veronique
700    1_
$a Vlaanderen, Jelle
700    1_
$a Stücker, Isabelle
700    1_
$a Guida, Florence
700    1_
$a Consonni, Dario
700    1_
$a Caporaso, Neil
700    1_
$a Landi, Maria Teresa
700    1_
$a Field, John
700    1_
$a Brüske, Irene
700    1_
$a Wichmann, Heinz-Erich
700    1_
$a Siemiatycki, Jack
700    1_
$a Parent, Marie-Elise
700    1_
$a Richiardi, Lorenzo
700    1_
$a Merletti, Franco
700    1_
$a Jöckel, Karl-Heinz
700    1_
$a Ahrens, Wolfgang
700    1_
$a Pohlabeln, Hermann
700    1_
$a Plato, Nils
700    1_
$a Tardón, Adonina
700    1_
$a Zaridze, David
700    1_
$a McLaughlin, John
700    1_
$a Demers, Paul
700    1_
$a Szeszenia-Dabrowska, Neonila
700    1_
$a Lissowska, Jolanta
700    1_
$a Rudnai, Peter
700    1_
$a Fabianova, Eleonora
700    1_
$a Stanescu Dumitru, Rodica
700    1_
$a Bencko, Vladimir
700    1_
$a Foretova, Lenka
700    1_
$a Janout, Vladimir
700    1_
$a Boffetta, Paolo
700    1_
$a Bueno-de-Mesquita, Bas
700    1_
$a Forastiere, Francesco
700    1_
$a Brüning, Thomas
700    1_
$a Straif, Kurt
773    0_
$w MED00004963 $t Epidemiology $x 1531-5487 $g Roč. 28, č. 2 (2017), s. 288-299
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28141674 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180404 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180418140331 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1288314 $s 1007641
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 28 $c 2 $d 288-299 $i 1531-5487 $m Epidemiology $n Epidemiology $x MED00004963
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180404

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...