• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

CSE database: extended annotations and new recommendations for ECG software testing

R. Smíšek, L. Maršánová, A. Němcová, M. Vítek, J. Kozumplík, M. Nováková,

. 2017 ; 55 (8) : 1473-1482. [pub] 20161231

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18010871
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2003-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

Nowadays, cardiovascular diseases represent the most common cause of death in western countries. Among various examination techniques, electrocardiography (ECG) is still a highly valuable tool used for the diagnosis of many cardiovascular disorders. In order to diagnose a person based on ECG, cardiologists can use automatic diagnostic algorithms. Research in this area is still necessary. In order to compare various algorithms correctly, it is necessary to test them on standard annotated databases, such as the Common Standards for Quantitative Electrocardiography (CSE) database. According to Scopus, the CSE database is the second most cited standard database. There were two main objectives in this work. First, new diagnoses were added to the CSE database, which extended its original annotations. Second, new recommendations for diagnostic software quality estimation were established. The ECG recordings were diagnosed by five new cardiologists independently, and in total, 59 different diagnoses were found. Such a large number of diagnoses is unique, even in terms of standard databases. Based on the cardiologists' diagnoses, a four-round consensus (4R consensus) was established. Such a 4R consensus means a correct final diagnosis, which should ideally be the output of any tested classification software. The accuracy of the cardiologists' diagnoses compared with the 4R consensus was the basis for the establishment of accuracy recommendations. The accuracy was determined in terms of sensitivity = 79.20-86.81%, positive predictive value = 79.10-87.11%, and the Jaccard coefficient = 72.21-81.14%, respectively. Within these ranges, the accuracy of the software is comparable with the accuracy of cardiologists. The accuracy quantification of the correct classification is unique. Diagnostic software developers can objectively evaluate the success of their algorithm and promote its further development. The annotations and recommendations proposed in this work will allow for faster development and testing of classification software. As a result, this might facilitate cardiologists' work and lead to faster diagnoses and earlier treatment.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18010871
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180419144148.0
007      
ta
008      
180404s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s11517-016-1607-5 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28040865
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Smíšek, Radovan $u Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Technická 3058/10, 61600, Brno, Czech Republic. xsmise00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz.
245    10
$a CSE database: extended annotations and new recommendations for ECG software testing / $c R. Smíšek, L. Maršánová, A. Němcová, M. Vítek, J. Kozumplík, M. Nováková,
520    9_
$a Nowadays, cardiovascular diseases represent the most common cause of death in western countries. Among various examination techniques, electrocardiography (ECG) is still a highly valuable tool used for the diagnosis of many cardiovascular disorders. In order to diagnose a person based on ECG, cardiologists can use automatic diagnostic algorithms. Research in this area is still necessary. In order to compare various algorithms correctly, it is necessary to test them on standard annotated databases, such as the Common Standards for Quantitative Electrocardiography (CSE) database. According to Scopus, the CSE database is the second most cited standard database. There were two main objectives in this work. First, new diagnoses were added to the CSE database, which extended its original annotations. Second, new recommendations for diagnostic software quality estimation were established. The ECG recordings were diagnosed by five new cardiologists independently, and in total, 59 different diagnoses were found. Such a large number of diagnoses is unique, even in terms of standard databases. Based on the cardiologists' diagnoses, a four-round consensus (4R consensus) was established. Such a 4R consensus means a correct final diagnosis, which should ideally be the output of any tested classification software. The accuracy of the cardiologists' diagnoses compared with the 4R consensus was the basis for the establishment of accuracy recommendations. The accuracy was determined in terms of sensitivity = 79.20-86.81%, positive predictive value = 79.10-87.11%, and the Jaccard coefficient = 72.21-81.14%, respectively. Within these ranges, the accuracy of the software is comparable with the accuracy of cardiologists. The accuracy quantification of the correct classification is unique. Diagnostic software developers can objectively evaluate the success of their algorithm and promote its further development. The annotations and recommendations proposed in this work will allow for faster development and testing of classification software. As a result, this might facilitate cardiologists' work and lead to faster diagnoses and earlier treatment.
650    _2
$a kardiovaskulární nemoci $x diagnóza $7 D002318
650    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
650    _2
$a databáze faktografické $x normy $7 D016208
650    _2
$a diagnóza počítačová $x normy $7 D003936
650    _2
$a elektrokardiografie $x normy $7 D004562
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma $7 D017410
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
650    12
$a validace softwaru $7 D012986
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Maršánová, Lucie $u Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Technická 3058/10, 61600, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Němcová, Andrea $u Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Technická 3058/10, 61600, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Vítek, Martin $u Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Technická 3058/10, 61600, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kozumplík, Jiří $u Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Technická 3058/10, 61600, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Nováková, Marie $u Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00003217 $t Medical & biological engineering & computing $x 1741-0444 $g Roč. 55, č. 8 (2017), s. 1473-1482
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28040865 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180404 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180419144250 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1288356 $s 1007683
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 55 $c 8 $d 1473-1482 $e 20161231 $i 1741-0444 $m Medical & biological engineering & computing $n Med Biol Eng Comput $x MED00003217
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180404

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...