• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors and Drugs Acting on Muscarinic Receptors- Potential Crosstalk of Cholinergic Mechanisms During Pharmacological Treatment

O. Soukup, M. Winder, UK. Killi, V. Wsol, D. Jun, K. Kuca, G. Tobin,

. 2017 ; 15 (4) : 637-653.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené arabské emiráty

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18011171
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK Free Medical Journals od 2005 do Před 1 rokem
PubMed Central od 2005 do Před 6 měsíci
Europe PubMed Central od 2005 do Před 6 měsíci

BACKGROUND: Pharmaceuticals with targets in the cholinergic transmission have been used for decades and are still fundamental treatments in many diseases and conditions today. Both the transmission and the effects of the somatomotoric and the parasympathetic nervous systems may be targeted by such treatments. Irrespective of the knowledge that the effects of neuronal signalling in the nervous systems may include a number of different receptor subtypes of both the nicotinic and the muscarinic receptors, this complexity is generally overlooked when assessing the mechanisms of action of pharmaceuticals. METHODS: We have search of bibliographic databases for peer-reviewed research literature focused on the cholinergic system. Also, we have taken advantage of our expertise in this field to deduce the conclusions of this study. RESULTS: Presently, the life cycle of acetylcholine, muscarinic receptors and their effects are reviewed in the major organ systems of the body. Neuronal and non-neuronal sources of acetylcholine are elucidated. Examples of pharmaceuticals, in particular cholinesterase inhibitors, affecting these systems are discussed. The review focuses on salivary glands, the respiratory tract and the lower urinary tract, since the complexity of the interplay of different muscarinic receptor subtypes is of significance for physiological, pharmacological and toxicological effects in these organs. CONCLUSION: Most pharmaceuticals targeting muscarinic receptors are employed at such large doses that no selectivity can be expected. However, some differences in the adverse effect profile of muscarinic antagonists may still be explained by the variation of expression of muscarinic receptor subtypes in different organs. However, a complex pattern of interactions between muscarinic receptor subtypes occurs and needs to be considered when searching for selective pharmaceuticals. In the development of new entities for the treatment of for instance pesticide intoxication, the muscarinic receptor selectivity needs to be considered. Reactivators generally have a muscarinic M2 receptor acting profile. Such a blockade may engrave the situation since it may enlarge the effect of the muscarinic M3 receptor effect. This may explain why respiratory arrest is the major cause for deaths by esterase blocking.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18011171
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180420134226.0
007      
ta
008      
180404s2017 ts f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.2174/1570159X14666160607212615 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27281175
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ts
100    1_
$a Soukup, Ondrej $u Department of Toxicology and Military Pharmacy, Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors and Drugs Acting on Muscarinic Receptors- Potential Crosstalk of Cholinergic Mechanisms During Pharmacological Treatment / $c O. Soukup, M. Winder, UK. Killi, V. Wsol, D. Jun, K. Kuca, G. Tobin,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Pharmaceuticals with targets in the cholinergic transmission have been used for decades and are still fundamental treatments in many diseases and conditions today. Both the transmission and the effects of the somatomotoric and the parasympathetic nervous systems may be targeted by such treatments. Irrespective of the knowledge that the effects of neuronal signalling in the nervous systems may include a number of different receptor subtypes of both the nicotinic and the muscarinic receptors, this complexity is generally overlooked when assessing the mechanisms of action of pharmaceuticals. METHODS: We have search of bibliographic databases for peer-reviewed research literature focused on the cholinergic system. Also, we have taken advantage of our expertise in this field to deduce the conclusions of this study. RESULTS: Presently, the life cycle of acetylcholine, muscarinic receptors and their effects are reviewed in the major organ systems of the body. Neuronal and non-neuronal sources of acetylcholine are elucidated. Examples of pharmaceuticals, in particular cholinesterase inhibitors, affecting these systems are discussed. The review focuses on salivary glands, the respiratory tract and the lower urinary tract, since the complexity of the interplay of different muscarinic receptor subtypes is of significance for physiological, pharmacological and toxicological effects in these organs. CONCLUSION: Most pharmaceuticals targeting muscarinic receptors are employed at such large doses that no selectivity can be expected. However, some differences in the adverse effect profile of muscarinic antagonists may still be explained by the variation of expression of muscarinic receptor subtypes in different organs. However, a complex pattern of interactions between muscarinic receptor subtypes occurs and needs to be considered when searching for selective pharmaceuticals. In the development of new entities for the treatment of for instance pesticide intoxication, the muscarinic receptor selectivity needs to be considered. Reactivators generally have a muscarinic M2 receptor acting profile. Such a blockade may engrave the situation since it may enlarge the effect of the muscarinic M3 receptor effect. This may explain why respiratory arrest is the major cause for deaths by esterase blocking.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a cholinesterasové inhibitory $x farmakologie $7 D002800
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a interakce mezi receptory a ligandy $x účinky léků $7 D020239
650    _2
$a receptory muskarinové $x účinky léků $7 D011976
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Winder, Michael $u Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Pharmacology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
700    1_
$a Killi, Uday Kumar $u Department of Biochemical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Wsol, Vladimir $u Department of Biochemical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Jun, Daniel $u Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kuca, Kamil $u Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Tobin, Gunnar $u Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Pharmacology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
773    0_
$w MED00007890 $t Current neuropharmacology $x 1875-6190 $g Roč. 15, č. 4 (2017), s. 637-653
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27281175 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180404 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180420134328 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1288656 $s 1007983
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 15 $c 4 $d 637-653 $i 1875-6190 $m Current neuropharmacology $n Curr Neuropharmacol $x MED00007890
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180404

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...