-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
A comparative reference study for the validation of HLA-matching algorithms in the search for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell donors and cord blood units
W. Bochtler, L. Gragert, ZI. Patel, J. Robinson, D. Steiner, JA. Hofmann, J. Pingel, A. Baouz, A. Melis, J. Schneider, HP. Eberhard, M. Oudshoorn, SG. Marsh, M. Maiers, CR. Müller,
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
PubMed
27219013
DOI
10.1111/tan.12817
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- alely * MeSH
- algoritmy * MeSH
- datové soubory jako téma MeSH
- frekvence genu MeSH
- haplotypy MeSH
- HLA antigeny klasifikace genetika imunologie MeSH
- homologní transplantace MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nepříbuzný dárce MeSH
- příjemce transplantátu MeSH
- registrace * MeSH
- testování histokompatibility MeSH
- transplantace hematopoetických kmenových buněk * MeSH
- transplantace kmenových buněk z pupečníkové krve * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
The accuracy of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matching algorithms is a prerequisite for the correct and efficient identification of optimal unrelated donors for patients requiring hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The goal of this World Marrow Donor Association study was to validate established matching algorithms from different international donor registries by challenging them with simulated input data and subsequently comparing the output. This experiment addressed three specific aspects of HLA matching using different data sets for tasks of increasing complexity. The first two tasks targeted the traditional matching approach identifying discrepancies between patient and donor HLA genotypes by counting antigen and allele differences. Contemporary matching procedures predicting the probability for HLA identity using haplotype frequencies were addressed by the third task. In each task, the identified disparities between the results of the participating computer programs were analyzed, classified and quantified. This study led to a deep understanding of the algorithms participating and finally produced virtually identical results. The unresolved discrepancies total to less than 1%, 4% and 2% for the three tasks and are mostly because of individual decisions in the design of the programs. Based on these findings, reference results for the three input data sets were compiled that can be used to validate future matching algorithms and thus improve the quality of the global donor search process.
Agence de la biomedecine Registre France Greffe de Moelle Paris France
Anthony Nolan Research Institute Royal Free Hospital London UK
Bone Marrow Donors Worldwide and Europdonor operated by Matchis Leiden The Netherlands
DKMS German Bone Marrow Donor Center Tübingen Germany
National Marrow Donor Program Minneapolis MN USA
Zentrales Knochenmarkspender Register Deutschland Ulm Germany
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18011204
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180426135955.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180404s2016 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/tan.12817 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27219013
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Bochtler, W $u Zentrales Knochenmarkspender-Register Deutschland (ZKRD), Ulm, Germany.
- 245 12
- $a A comparative reference study for the validation of HLA-matching algorithms in the search for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell donors and cord blood units / $c W. Bochtler, L. Gragert, ZI. Patel, J. Robinson, D. Steiner, JA. Hofmann, J. Pingel, A. Baouz, A. Melis, J. Schneider, HP. Eberhard, M. Oudshoorn, SG. Marsh, M. Maiers, CR. Müller,
- 520 9_
- $a The accuracy of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matching algorithms is a prerequisite for the correct and efficient identification of optimal unrelated donors for patients requiring hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The goal of this World Marrow Donor Association study was to validate established matching algorithms from different international donor registries by challenging them with simulated input data and subsequently comparing the output. This experiment addressed three specific aspects of HLA matching using different data sets for tasks of increasing complexity. The first two tasks targeted the traditional matching approach identifying discrepancies between patient and donor HLA genotypes by counting antigen and allele differences. Contemporary matching procedures predicting the probability for HLA identity using haplotype frequencies were addressed by the third task. In each task, the identified disparities between the results of the participating computer programs were analyzed, classified and quantified. This study led to a deep understanding of the algorithms participating and finally produced virtually identical results. The unresolved discrepancies total to less than 1%, 4% and 2% for the three tasks and are mostly because of individual decisions in the design of the programs. Based on these findings, reference results for the three input data sets were compiled that can be used to validate future matching algorithms and thus improve the quality of the global donor search process.
- 650 12
- $a algoritmy $7 D000465
- 650 12
- $a alely $7 D000483
- 650 12
- $a transplantace kmenových buněk z pupečníkové krve $7 D036101
- 650 _2
- $a datové soubory jako téma $7 D066264
- 650 _2
- $a frekvence genu $7 D005787
- 650 _2
- $a HLA antigeny $x klasifikace $x genetika $x imunologie $7 D006680
- 650 _2
- $a haplotypy $7 D006239
- 650 12
- $a transplantace hematopoetických kmenových buněk $7 D018380
- 650 _2
- $a testování histokompatibility $7 D006650
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a registrace $7 D012042
- 650 _2
- $a příjemce transplantátu $7 D066027
- 650 _2
- $a homologní transplantace $7 D014184
- 650 _2
- $a nepříbuzný dárce $7 D061349
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. $7 D013486
- 700 1_
- $a Gragert, L $u National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, MN, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Patel, Z I $u Anthony Nolan Research Institute (ANRI), Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Robinson, J $u Anthony Nolan Research Institute (ANRI), Royal Free Hospital, London, UK. UCL Cancer Institute, Royal Free Campus, London, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Steiner, D $u Czech Stem Cells Registry (CSCR) and Department of Cybernetics, Czech Technical University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Hofmann, J A $u DKMS German Bone Marrow Donor Center, Tübingen, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Pingel, J $u DKMS German Bone Marrow Donor Center, Tübingen, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Baouz, A $u Agence de la biomedecine - Registre France Greffe de Moelle (FGM), Paris, France.
- 700 1_
- $a Melis, A $u Bone Marrow Donors Worldwide (BMDW) and Europdonor operated by Matchis, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- 700 1_
- $a Schneider, J $u National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, MN, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Eberhard, H-P $u Zentrales Knochenmarkspender-Register Deutschland (ZKRD), Ulm, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Oudshoorn, M $u Bone Marrow Donors Worldwide (BMDW) and Europdonor operated by Matchis, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- 700 1_
- $a Marsh, S G E $u Anthony Nolan Research Institute (ANRI), Royal Free Hospital, London, UK. UCL Cancer Institute, Royal Free Campus, London, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Maiers, M $u National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, MN, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Müller, C R $u Zentrales Knochenmarkspender-Register Deutschland (ZKRD), Ulm, Germany.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00195031 $t HLA $x 2059-2310 $g Roč. 87, č. 6 (2016), s. 439-48
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27219013 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180404 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180426140106 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1288689 $s 1008016
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 87 $c 6 $d 439-48 $e 20160524 $i 2059-2310 $m HLA $n HLA $x MED00195031
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180404