Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Measurement instruments to assess posture, gait, and balance in Parkinson's disease: Critique and recommendations

BR. Bloem, J. Marinus, Q. Almeida, L. Dibble, A. Nieuwboer, B. Post, E. Ruzicka, C. Goetz, G. Stebbins, P. Martinez-Martin, A. Schrag, . ,

. 2016 ; 31 (9) : 1342-55. [pub] 20160304

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy, práce podpořená grantem, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18011286

BACKGROUND: Disorders of posture, gait, and balance in Parkinson's disease (PD) are common and debilitating. This MDS-commissioned task force assessed clinimetric properties of existing rating scales, questionnaires, and timed tests that assess these features in PD. METHODS: A literature review was conducted. Identified instruments were evaluated systematically and classified as "recommended," "suggested," or "listed." Inclusion of rating scales was restricted to those that could be used readily in clinical research and practice. RESULTS: One rating scale was classified as "recommended" (UPDRS-derived Postural Instability and Gait Difficulty score) and 2 as "suggested" (Tinetti Balance Scale, Rating Scale for Gait Evaluation). Three scales requiring equipment (Berg Balance Scale, Mini-BESTest, Dynamic Gait Index) also fulfilled criteria for "recommended" and 2 for "suggested" (FOG score, Gait and Balance Scale). Four questionnaires were "recommended" (Freezing of Gait Questionnaire, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, Falls Efficacy Scale, Survey of Activities, and Fear of Falling in the Elderly-Modified). Four tests were classified as "recommended" (6-minute and 10-m walk tests, Timed Up-and-Go, Functional Reach). CONCLUSION: We identified several questionnaires that adequately assess freezing of gait and balance confidence in PD and a number of useful clinical tests. However, most clinical rating scales for gait, balance, and posture perform suboptimally or have been evaluated insufficiently. No instrument comprehensively and separately evaluates all relevant PD-specific gait characteristics with good clinimetric properties, and none provides separate balance and gait scores with adequate content validity for PD. We therefore recommend the development of such a PD-specific, easily administered, comprehensive gait and balance scale that separately assesses all relevant constructs. © 2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18011286
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180404142712.0
007      
ta
008      
180404s2016 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/mds.26572 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26945525
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Bloem, Bastiaan R $u Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Dept. of Neurology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. bas.bloem@radboudumc.nl.
245    10
$a Measurement instruments to assess posture, gait, and balance in Parkinson's disease: Critique and recommendations / $c BR. Bloem, J. Marinus, Q. Almeida, L. Dibble, A. Nieuwboer, B. Post, E. Ruzicka, C. Goetz, G. Stebbins, P. Martinez-Martin, A. Schrag, . ,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Disorders of posture, gait, and balance in Parkinson's disease (PD) are common and debilitating. This MDS-commissioned task force assessed clinimetric properties of existing rating scales, questionnaires, and timed tests that assess these features in PD. METHODS: A literature review was conducted. Identified instruments were evaluated systematically and classified as "recommended," "suggested," or "listed." Inclusion of rating scales was restricted to those that could be used readily in clinical research and practice. RESULTS: One rating scale was classified as "recommended" (UPDRS-derived Postural Instability and Gait Difficulty score) and 2 as "suggested" (Tinetti Balance Scale, Rating Scale for Gait Evaluation). Three scales requiring equipment (Berg Balance Scale, Mini-BESTest, Dynamic Gait Index) also fulfilled criteria for "recommended" and 2 for "suggested" (FOG score, Gait and Balance Scale). Four questionnaires were "recommended" (Freezing of Gait Questionnaire, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, Falls Efficacy Scale, Survey of Activities, and Fear of Falling in the Elderly-Modified). Four tests were classified as "recommended" (6-minute and 10-m walk tests, Timed Up-and-Go, Functional Reach). CONCLUSION: We identified several questionnaires that adequately assess freezing of gait and balance confidence in PD and a number of useful clinical tests. However, most clinical rating scales for gait, balance, and posture perform suboptimally or have been evaluated insufficiently. No instrument comprehensively and separately evaluates all relevant PD-specific gait characteristics with good clinimetric properties, and none provides separate balance and gait scores with adequate content validity for PD. We therefore recommend the development of such a PD-specific, easily administered, comprehensive gait and balance scale that separately assesses all relevant constructs. © 2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
650    _2
$a diagnostické techniky a postupy $x normy $7 D019937
650    _2
$a neurologické poruchy chůze $x diagnóza $x etiologie $7 D020233
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a Parkinsonova nemoc $x komplikace $x diagnóza $7 D010300
650    12
$a posturální rovnováha $7 D004856
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
655    _2
$a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural $7 D052061
700    1_
$a Marinus, Johan $u Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Leiden, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Almeida, Quincy $u Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research & Rehabilitation Centre; Department of Kinesiology & Physical Education, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
700    1_
$a Dibble, Lee $u University of Utah, Department of Physical Therapy, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
700    1_
$a Nieuwboer, Alice $u KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Post, Bart $u Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Dept. of Neurology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Ruzicka, Evzen $u 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Dept. of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Goetz, Christopher $u Department of Neurological Services, Rush University School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
700    1_
$a Stebbins, Glenn $u Department of Neurological Services, Rush University School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
700    1_
$a Martinez-Martin, Pablo $u Alzheimer Center Reina Sofia Foundation and CIBERNED, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain.
700    1_
$a Schrag, Anette $u UCL Institute of Neurology, University College, London, UK.
700    1_
$a ,
773    0_
$w MED00003420 $t Movement disorders official journal of the Movement Disorder Society $x 1531-8257 $g Roč. 31, č. 9 (2016), s. 1342-55
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26945525 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180404 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180404142752 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1288771 $s 1008098
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 31 $c 9 $d 1342-55 $e 20160304 $i 1531-8257 $m Movement disorders $n Mov Disord $x MED00003420
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180404

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace